Marcelo A Rada, Paula Edit Cuffaro, María Celeste Szydlowicz, Verónica Andrea Peuchot, Margarita Susana Morales, Jorge Javier Janson, Ruben Micali, José Alfie, Carlos Rodolfo Galarza
{"title":"[一种新型阻抗心电图仪在门诊高血压患者无创血流动力学测量中的验证]","authors":"Marcelo A Rada, Paula Edit Cuffaro, María Celeste Szydlowicz, Verónica Andrea Peuchot, Margarita Susana Morales, Jorge Javier Janson, Ruben Micali, José Alfie, Carlos Rodolfo Galarza","doi":"10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the new cardiograph ZLogic for non-invasive measurements of Stroke volume (SV) and Cardiac output (CO) against the Minnesota cardiograph.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>86 subjects from both genders, 18-80 years old, hypertensive and healthy volunteers were included. Three hemodynamic measurements performed with each device, in an alternate fashion, using the Bland-Altman method to determine the level of agreement. Percentage error was calculated for interchangeability of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SV was 86.71±27.35 mL and mean CO 5.42±1.74 L/min. There was a strong correlation between measures of SV and CO obtained with both devices (r=0.99, p<0.001). Mean difference (MD) for SV was 0.65±3.08 mL (CI95%: -0.01-1.31) and 95% limits of agreement −5.39 to +6.69 mL. MD for CO was 0.05±0.17 L/min (CI95%: 0.01-0.09) and the 95% limits of agreement −0.28 to +0.38 L/min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZLogic and Minnesota cardiographs provided equivalent SV and CO values in ambulatory hypertensive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38814,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","volume":"82 1","pages":"95-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation of a new impedance cardiography device for noninvasive hemodynamic measurement in outpatient hypertensive patients]\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo A Rada, Paula Edit Cuffaro, María Celeste Szydlowicz, Verónica Andrea Peuchot, Margarita Susana Morales, Jorge Javier Janson, Ruben Micali, José Alfie, Carlos Rodolfo Galarza\",\"doi\":\"10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the new cardiograph ZLogic for non-invasive measurements of Stroke volume (SV) and Cardiac output (CO) against the Minnesota cardiograph.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>86 subjects from both genders, 18-80 years old, hypertensive and healthy volunteers were included. Three hemodynamic measurements performed with each device, in an alternate fashion, using the Bland-Altman method to determine the level of agreement. Percentage error was calculated for interchangeability of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SV was 86.71±27.35 mL and mean CO 5.42±1.74 L/min. There was a strong correlation between measures of SV and CO obtained with both devices (r=0.99, p<0.001). Mean difference (MD) for SV was 0.65±3.08 mL (CI95%: -0.01-1.31) and 95% limits of agreement −5.39 to +6.69 mL. MD for CO was 0.05±0.17 L/min (CI95%: 0.01-0.09) and the 95% limits of agreement −0.28 to +0.38 L/min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZLogic and Minnesota cardiographs provided equivalent SV and CO values in ambulatory hypertensive patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"95-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Validation of a new impedance cardiography device for noninvasive hemodynamic measurement in outpatient hypertensive patients]
Objective: To compare the new cardiograph ZLogic for non-invasive measurements of Stroke volume (SV) and Cardiac output (CO) against the Minnesota cardiograph.
Methods: 86 subjects from both genders, 18-80 years old, hypertensive and healthy volunteers were included. Three hemodynamic measurements performed with each device, in an alternate fashion, using the Bland-Altman method to determine the level of agreement. Percentage error was calculated for interchangeability of both methods.
Results: Mean SV was 86.71±27.35 mL and mean CO 5.42±1.74 L/min. There was a strong correlation between measures of SV and CO obtained with both devices (r=0.99, p<0.001). Mean difference (MD) for SV was 0.65±3.08 mL (CI95%: -0.01-1.31) and 95% limits of agreement −5.39 to +6.69 mL. MD for CO was 0.05±0.17 L/min (CI95%: 0.01-0.09) and the 95% limits of agreement −0.28 to +0.38 L/min.
Conclusion: ZLogic and Minnesota cardiographs provided equivalent SV and CO values in ambulatory hypertensive patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Faculty of Medical Sciences is a scientific publication of the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the National University of Cordoba. Its objective is to disseminate and promote research work related to Medical and Biological Sciences. It publishes scientific works of national and international professionals on different topics related to health sciences from the field of medicine, nursing, kinesiology, diagnostic imaging, phonoaudiology, nutrition, public health, chemical sciences, dentistry and related.