中文版医院护士护理质量量表的心理测量特征:双因素探索性结构方程模型分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Chiu-Shu Fang, Cheng-Hsien Li, Shu-Ching Ma, Fang-Ming Hwang, Maria Manuela Martins, Fan-Hao Chou
{"title":"中文版医院护士护理质量量表的心理测量特征:双因素探索性结构方程模型分析。","authors":"Chiu-Shu Fang, Cheng-Hsien Li, Shu-Ching Ma, Fang-Ming Hwang, Maria Manuela Martins, Fan-Hao Chou","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03012-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses play an indispensable role in healthcare teams. The quality of nursing care reflects nurses' ability to integrate care and their overall performance in patient care, making it a core objective of clinical nursing. The Chinese version of the Quality of Nursing Care (QNC) scale is a multidimensional assessment tool used for self-evaluation of nursing care quality and holds significant importance in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the QNC scale among nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, cross-sectional, methodological study conducted at three hospitals in southern Taiwan. The 25-item Chinese version of the QNC scale was employed in the study. Data were collected from 944 nurses (response rate: 65.42%) through an online survey conducted between July and August 2022. The factor structure of the QNC scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (unidimensional, independent cluster model, higher-order, and bifactor) and first-order, higher-order, and bifactor ESEM. Model comparisons were conducted to determine the best-fitting factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bifactor ESEM provided the best fit for the QNC scale, consisting of a general QNC factor and seven specific factors: patient satisfaction, health promotion, complication prevention, well-being and self-care, functional readaptation, nursing care organization, and responsibility and rigor. Some items exhibited significant cross-loadings, highlighting the model's ability to capture the multidimensional nature of nursing care quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bifactor ESEM model demonstrated the best model fit for the Chinese version of the QNC scale, offering a reliable and interpretable representation of the multidimensional nature of nursing care. The validated scale provides a valuable tool for assessing nursing care quality in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the quality of nursing care scale among hospital nurses: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chiu-Shu Fang, Cheng-Hsien Li, Shu-Ching Ma, Fang-Ming Hwang, Maria Manuela Martins, Fan-Hao Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03012-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses play an indispensable role in healthcare teams. The quality of nursing care reflects nurses' ability to integrate care and their overall performance in patient care, making it a core objective of clinical nursing. The Chinese version of the Quality of Nursing Care (QNC) scale is a multidimensional assessment tool used for self-evaluation of nursing care quality and holds significant importance in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the QNC scale among nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, cross-sectional, methodological study conducted at three hospitals in southern Taiwan. The 25-item Chinese version of the QNC scale was employed in the study. Data were collected from 944 nurses (response rate: 65.42%) through an online survey conducted between July and August 2022. The factor structure of the QNC scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (unidimensional, independent cluster model, higher-order, and bifactor) and first-order, higher-order, and bifactor ESEM. Model comparisons were conducted to determine the best-fitting factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bifactor ESEM provided the best fit for the QNC scale, consisting of a general QNC factor and seven specific factors: patient satisfaction, health promotion, complication prevention, well-being and self-care, functional readaptation, nursing care organization, and responsibility and rigor. Some items exhibited significant cross-loadings, highlighting the model's ability to capture the multidimensional nature of nursing care quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bifactor ESEM model demonstrated the best model fit for the Chinese version of the QNC scale, offering a reliable and interpretable representation of the multidimensional nature of nursing care. The validated scale provides a valuable tool for assessing nursing care quality in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959774/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03012-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03012-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护士在医疗团队中扮演着不可或缺的角色。护理质量反映了护士整合护理的能力及其在患者护理中的整体表现,是临床护理的核心目标。中文版护理质量(Quality of Nursing Care, QNC)量表是一种用于护理质量自我评价的多维度评估工具,在临床实践中具有重要意义。本研究旨在评估中文版护士QNC量表的信度和效度。方法:本研究是在台湾南部三所医院进行的观察性横断面方法学研究。本研究采用25项中文版QNC量表。通过2022年7月至8月的在线调查,收集了944名护士(回复率:65.42%)的数据。采用验证性因子分析(一维、独立聚类模型、高阶、双因子)和一阶、高阶、双因子ESEM对QNC量表的因子结构进行评价。通过模型比较来确定最适合的因子结构。结果:双因子ESEM最适合QNC量表,该量表由QNC一般因子和患者满意度、健康促进、并发症预防、幸福感和自我护理、功能再适应、护理组织、责任和严谨性7个特定因子组成。一些项目表现出显著的交叉负载,突出了模型捕捉护理质量多维性质的能力。结论:双因子ESEM模型最适合中文版的QNC量表,对护理的多维性提供了可靠且可解释的表征。该量表为临床护理质量评估提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the quality of nursing care scale among hospital nurses: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling analysis.

Background: Nurses play an indispensable role in healthcare teams. The quality of nursing care reflects nurses' ability to integrate care and their overall performance in patient care, making it a core objective of clinical nursing. The Chinese version of the Quality of Nursing Care (QNC) scale is a multidimensional assessment tool used for self-evaluation of nursing care quality and holds significant importance in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the QNC scale among nurses.

Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, methodological study conducted at three hospitals in southern Taiwan. The 25-item Chinese version of the QNC scale was employed in the study. Data were collected from 944 nurses (response rate: 65.42%) through an online survey conducted between July and August 2022. The factor structure of the QNC scale was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (unidimensional, independent cluster model, higher-order, and bifactor) and first-order, higher-order, and bifactor ESEM. Model comparisons were conducted to determine the best-fitting factor structure.

Results: The bifactor ESEM provided the best fit for the QNC scale, consisting of a general QNC factor and seven specific factors: patient satisfaction, health promotion, complication prevention, well-being and self-care, functional readaptation, nursing care organization, and responsibility and rigor. Some items exhibited significant cross-loadings, highlighting the model's ability to capture the multidimensional nature of nursing care quality.

Conclusions: The bifactor ESEM model demonstrated the best model fit for the Chinese version of the QNC scale, offering a reliable and interpretable representation of the multidimensional nature of nursing care. The validated scale provides a valuable tool for assessing nursing care quality in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信