预测咽喉反流疾病治疗反应的机器学习模型的发展。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Su Il Kim, Young-Gyu Eun, Young Chan Lee
{"title":"预测咽喉反流疾病治疗反应的机器学习模型的发展。","authors":"Su Il Kim, Young-Gyu Eun, Young Chan Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a challenging condition requiring effective treatment. Thus, understanding the factors that influence therapeutic response in LPRD is crucial. This study leverages machine learning models to predict the therapeutic responses and identify the key influencing factors in LPRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with typical LPRD symptoms showing more than one pharyngeal reflux episode on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring were collected retrospectively from two independent otolaryngologic clinics. Patients who were prescribed proton pump inhibitor therapy and followed up for at least 2 months were included. Patients who showed a ≥50% decrease in the follow-up reflux symptom index score during treatment periods compared with pre treatment were defined as responders. Among various demographic and 24-hour MII-pH monitoring parameters, features showing the absolute correlation coefficients ≥0.1 with response were selected. Four machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting-were applied to the training cohort and assessed in the internal and external validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients from two otolaryngologic clinics were assigned to the internal dataset (n = 157) and external dataset (n = 53). All four models showed comparable predictive performances, illustrating their potential utility in clinical decision-making. Among them, the logistic regression model demonstrated the best performance with accuracy and F1 scores of 82.98% and 88.24% in the internal validation cohort and 84.91% and 86.21% in the external validation cohort predicting therapeutic responses in LPRD. Feature importance analysis revealed vital factors, such as proximal total reflux time and weak acid time, influencing therapeutic response, and offering insights into LPRD management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing the therapeutic response in LPRD, underscoring the utility of machine learning in refining treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating machine learning models into clinical practice can significantly improve LPRD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Therapeutic Responses in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Su Il Kim, Young-Gyu Eun, Young Chan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a challenging condition requiring effective treatment. Thus, understanding the factors that influence therapeutic response in LPRD is crucial. This study leverages machine learning models to predict the therapeutic responses and identify the key influencing factors in LPRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with typical LPRD symptoms showing more than one pharyngeal reflux episode on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring were collected retrospectively from two independent otolaryngologic clinics. Patients who were prescribed proton pump inhibitor therapy and followed up for at least 2 months were included. Patients who showed a ≥50% decrease in the follow-up reflux symptom index score during treatment periods compared with pre treatment were defined as responders. Among various demographic and 24-hour MII-pH monitoring parameters, features showing the absolute correlation coefficients ≥0.1 with response were selected. Four machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting-were applied to the training cohort and assessed in the internal and external validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients from two otolaryngologic clinics were assigned to the internal dataset (n = 157) and external dataset (n = 53). All four models showed comparable predictive performances, illustrating their potential utility in clinical decision-making. Among them, the logistic regression model demonstrated the best performance with accuracy and F1 scores of 82.98% and 88.24% in the internal validation cohort and 84.91% and 86.21% in the external validation cohort predicting therapeutic responses in LPRD. Feature importance analysis revealed vital factors, such as proximal total reflux time and weak acid time, influencing therapeutic response, and offering insights into LPRD management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing the therapeutic response in LPRD, underscoring the utility of machine learning in refining treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating machine learning models into clinical practice can significantly improve LPRD management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:喉咽反流病(LPRD)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,需要有效的治疗。因此,了解影响LPRD治疗反应的因素至关重要。本研究利用机器学习模型预测LPRD的治疗反应,并确定LPRD的关键影响因素。方法:回顾性收集两家独立耳鼻喉科门诊24小时多通道腔内阻抗(MII)-pH监测中出现一次以上咽反流发作的典型LPRD症状患者。接受质子泵抑制剂治疗并随访至少2个月的患者纳入研究。与治疗前相比,治疗期间随访反流症状指数评分下降≥50%的患者被定义为有反应者。在各种人口统计学和24小时MII-pH监测参数中,选择与反应绝对相关系数≥0.1的特征。四种机器学习模型——逻辑回归、随机森林、支持向量机和梯度增强——应用于训练队列,并在内部和外部验证队列中进行评估。结果:来自两个耳鼻喉科诊所的患者被分配到内部数据集(n = 157)和外部数据集(n = 53)。所有四种模型都显示出相当的预测性能,说明了它们在临床决策中的潜在效用。其中,logistic回归模型预测LPRD治疗反应的准确性和F1评分在内部验证队列中分别为82.98%和88.24%,在外部验证队列中分别为84.91%和86.21%,表现最佳。特征重要性分析揭示了影响治疗反应的重要因素,如近端总反流时间和弱酸时间,并为LPRD的管理提供了见解。结论:本研究对影响LPRD治疗反应的因素提供了有价值的见解,强调了机器学习在改进治疗策略方面的效用。我们的研究结果表明,将机器学习模型整合到临床实践中可以显著改善LPRD的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Therapeutic Responses in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a challenging condition requiring effective treatment. Thus, understanding the factors that influence therapeutic response in LPRD is crucial. This study leverages machine learning models to predict the therapeutic responses and identify the key influencing factors in LPRD.

Methods: Patients with typical LPRD symptoms showing more than one pharyngeal reflux episode on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring were collected retrospectively from two independent otolaryngologic clinics. Patients who were prescribed proton pump inhibitor therapy and followed up for at least 2 months were included. Patients who showed a ≥50% decrease in the follow-up reflux symptom index score during treatment periods compared with pre treatment were defined as responders. Among various demographic and 24-hour MII-pH monitoring parameters, features showing the absolute correlation coefficients ≥0.1 with response were selected. Four machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting-were applied to the training cohort and assessed in the internal and external validation cohorts.

Results: Patients from two otolaryngologic clinics were assigned to the internal dataset (n = 157) and external dataset (n = 53). All four models showed comparable predictive performances, illustrating their potential utility in clinical decision-making. Among them, the logistic regression model demonstrated the best performance with accuracy and F1 scores of 82.98% and 88.24% in the internal validation cohort and 84.91% and 86.21% in the external validation cohort predicting therapeutic responses in LPRD. Feature importance analysis revealed vital factors, such as proximal total reflux time and weak acid time, influencing therapeutic response, and offering insights into LPRD management.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing the therapeutic response in LPRD, underscoring the utility of machine learning in refining treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that integrating machine learning models into clinical practice can significantly improve LPRD management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信