Filip Kowalski, Błażej Kuffel, Michał Późniak, Pavel Lipowski, Michal Czarnogorski, Jacek Wilamowski, Adam Ostrowski, Jan Adamowicz, Tomasz Drewa
{"title":"输尿管狭窄的腔内治疗与自扩支架的应用:是否有可能在内镜下完全治愈狭窄?35例支架植入术,随访2年。回顾性研究。","authors":"Filip Kowalski, Błażej Kuffel, Michał Późniak, Pavel Lipowski, Michal Czarnogorski, Jacek Wilamowski, Adam Ostrowski, Jan Adamowicz, Tomasz Drewa","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05574-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current results of endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures are characterized by very divergent treatment results, which is due to a wide range of criteria for including patients in the analyses and different definitions of effective treatment. In this retrospect study we wanted to introduce a possibility of curing ureteral strictures depending on their type and degree with the use of self-expanding ureteral stents (SUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>33 patients with ureteral strictures received endourological treatment with the use of Allium® SUS (2 patients with SUS placed on both sides). Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with uncomplicated strictures (Grp 1) and patients with complicated strictures (Grp 2). Uncomplicated stricture was defined as a single stricture below 2 cm. A complicated stricture was defined as a stricture over 2 cm and/or multiple strictures. The follow-up time was 24 months. All patients were scheduled for renoscintigraphy during the treatment. A full therapeutic success was defined as no tight stenosis in renoscintigraphic furosemide test after SUS explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Grp 1, full therapeutic success was achieved in 80% of patients, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Serious complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3a) occurred significantly more often in Grp 2 (p = 0.046). Renal outflow during stenting was present in 70% of the patients in Grp 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A full therapeutic success of endoscopic, SUS-assisted treatment can be considered among patients with short, single ureteral stricture. In long and/or multiple strictures, SUS can be used as drainage element, but full recovery of the stricture is unlikely.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endourological treatment of ureteral strictures with the use of self-expanding stents: is it possible to completely cure the stricture endoscopically? A report on the experience with implantation of 35 stents with a two-year follow-up period; a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Filip Kowalski, Błażej Kuffel, Michał Późniak, Pavel Lipowski, Michal Czarnogorski, Jacek Wilamowski, Adam Ostrowski, Jan Adamowicz, Tomasz Drewa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05574-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current results of endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures are characterized by very divergent treatment results, which is due to a wide range of criteria for including patients in the analyses and different definitions of effective treatment. In this retrospect study we wanted to introduce a possibility of curing ureteral strictures depending on their type and degree with the use of self-expanding ureteral stents (SUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>33 patients with ureteral strictures received endourological treatment with the use of Allium® SUS (2 patients with SUS placed on both sides). Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with uncomplicated strictures (Grp 1) and patients with complicated strictures (Grp 2). Uncomplicated stricture was defined as a single stricture below 2 cm. A complicated stricture was defined as a stricture over 2 cm and/or multiple strictures. The follow-up time was 24 months. All patients were scheduled for renoscintigraphy during the treatment. A full therapeutic success was defined as no tight stenosis in renoscintigraphic furosemide test after SUS explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Grp 1, full therapeutic success was achieved in 80% of patients, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Serious complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3a) occurred significantly more often in Grp 2 (p = 0.046). Renal outflow during stenting was present in 70% of the patients in Grp 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A full therapeutic success of endoscopic, SUS-assisted treatment can be considered among patients with short, single ureteral stricture. In long and/or multiple strictures, SUS can be used as drainage element, but full recovery of the stricture is unlikely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05574-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05574-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endourological treatment of ureteral strictures with the use of self-expanding stents: is it possible to completely cure the stricture endoscopically? A report on the experience with implantation of 35 stents with a two-year follow-up period; a retrospective study.
Background: The current results of endoscopic treatment of ureteral strictures are characterized by very divergent treatment results, which is due to a wide range of criteria for including patients in the analyses and different definitions of effective treatment. In this retrospect study we wanted to introduce a possibility of curing ureteral strictures depending on their type and degree with the use of self-expanding ureteral stents (SUS).
Methods: 33 patients with ureteral strictures received endourological treatment with the use of Allium® SUS (2 patients with SUS placed on both sides). Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with uncomplicated strictures (Grp 1) and patients with complicated strictures (Grp 2). Uncomplicated stricture was defined as a single stricture below 2 cm. A complicated stricture was defined as a stricture over 2 cm and/or multiple strictures. The follow-up time was 24 months. All patients were scheduled for renoscintigraphy during the treatment. A full therapeutic success was defined as no tight stenosis in renoscintigraphic furosemide test after SUS explantation.
Results: In Grp 1, full therapeutic success was achieved in 80% of patients, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Serious complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3a) occurred significantly more often in Grp 2 (p = 0.046). Renal outflow during stenting was present in 70% of the patients in Grp 2.
Conclusions: A full therapeutic success of endoscopic, SUS-assisted treatment can be considered among patients with short, single ureteral stricture. In long and/or multiple strictures, SUS can be used as drainage element, but full recovery of the stricture is unlikely.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.