三种评分系统与肝硬化合并脓毒症患者预后的相关性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li-Nan Liu, Yu-Fei Chang, Hui Wang
{"title":"三种评分系统与肝硬化合并脓毒症患者预后的相关性。","authors":"Li-Nan Liu, Yu-Fei Chang, Hui Wang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe symptoms associated with sepsis syndrome (SS) are considered a severe threat, which not only increases therapeutic difficulty but also causes a prognostic mortality rate. However, at present, few related studies focused on the application of different score scales for disease and prognosis assessment in liver cirrhosis (LC) complicated with SS.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the correlations of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and modified early warning score (MEWS) points with the prognosis of patients with LC complicated with SS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 426 LC cases from February 2019 to April 2022. Of them, 225 cases that were complicated with SS were assigned to the LC + SS group, and 201 simple LC cases were included in the LC group. Intergroup differences in MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were compared, as well as their diagnostic value for LC + SS. The correlations of the three scores with the prognosis of patients with LC + SS were further analyzed, as well as the related risk factors affecting patients' outcomes, after the follow-up investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were all higher in the LC + SS group <i>vs</i> the LC group, and their combined assessment for LC + SS revealed a diagnostic sensitivity and a specificity of 89.66% and 90.84%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LC + SS group reported 58 deaths, with an overall mortality rate of 25.78%. Deceased patients presented higher MELD, SOFA, and MEWS points than those who survived (<i>P</i> < 0.05). MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were determined by COX analysis as factors independently affecting the prognosis of patients with LC + SS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MELD, SOFA, and MEWS effectively diagnosed LC in patients complicated with SS, and they demonstrated great significance in assessing prognosis, which provides a reliable prognosis guarantee for patients with LC + SS. However, their assessment effects remain limited, which is worthy of further investigation by more in-depth and rigorous experimental analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"99570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlations of three scoring systems with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with sepsis syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Nan Liu, Yu-Fei Chang, Hui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe symptoms associated with sepsis syndrome (SS) are considered a severe threat, which not only increases therapeutic difficulty but also causes a prognostic mortality rate. However, at present, few related studies focused on the application of different score scales for disease and prognosis assessment in liver cirrhosis (LC) complicated with SS.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the correlations of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and modified early warning score (MEWS) points with the prognosis of patients with LC complicated with SS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 426 LC cases from February 2019 to April 2022. Of them, 225 cases that were complicated with SS were assigned to the LC + SS group, and 201 simple LC cases were included in the LC group. Intergroup differences in MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were compared, as well as their diagnostic value for LC + SS. The correlations of the three scores with the prognosis of patients with LC + SS were further analyzed, as well as the related risk factors affecting patients' outcomes, after the follow-up investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were all higher in the LC + SS group <i>vs</i> the LC group, and their combined assessment for LC + SS revealed a diagnostic sensitivity and a specificity of 89.66% and 90.84%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LC + SS group reported 58 deaths, with an overall mortality rate of 25.78%. Deceased patients presented higher MELD, SOFA, and MEWS points than those who survived (<i>P</i> < 0.05). MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were determined by COX analysis as factors independently affecting the prognosis of patients with LC + SS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MELD, SOFA, and MEWS effectively diagnosed LC in patients complicated with SS, and they demonstrated great significance in assessing prognosis, which provides a reliable prognosis guarantee for patients with LC + SS. However, their assessment effects remain limited, which is worthy of further investigation by more in-depth and rigorous experimental analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"99570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与脓毒症综合征(SS)相关的严重症状被认为是一种严重的威胁,不仅增加了治疗难度,而且导致预后死亡率。然而,目前很少有相关研究关注不同评分量表在肝硬化(LC)合并ss的疾病及预后评估中的应用。目的:探讨终末期肝病模型(MELD)、序期器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和改良预警评分(MEWS)积分与LC合并ss患者预后的相关性。该回顾性分析包括2019年2月至2022年4月期间的426例LC病例。其中合并SS 225例为LC + SS组,单纯LC 201例为LC组。比较MELD、SOFA、MEWS评分的组间差异及其对LC + SS的诊断价值,并在随访后进一步分析三者与LC + SS患者预后的相关性,以及影响患者预后的相关危险因素。结果:LC + SS组MELD、SOFA、MEWS评分均高于LC组,其联合评估LC + SS的诊断敏感性为89.66%,特异性为90.84% (P < 0.05)。LC + SS组报告58例死亡,总死亡率为25.78%。死亡患者MELD、SOFA、MEWS积分均高于存活患者(P < 0.05)。COX分析确定MELD、SOFA、MEWS评分为LC + SS患者预后的独立影响因素(P < 0.05)。结论:MELD、SOFA、MEWS可有效诊断SS合并患者的LC,对预后的评估具有重要意义,为LC + SS患者的预后提供了可靠的保障,但其评估效果仍然有限,值得进一步深入严谨的实验分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlations of three scoring systems with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with sepsis syndrome.

Background: Severe symptoms associated with sepsis syndrome (SS) are considered a severe threat, which not only increases therapeutic difficulty but also causes a prognostic mortality rate. However, at present, few related studies focused on the application of different score scales for disease and prognosis assessment in liver cirrhosis (LC) complicated with SS.

Aim: To determine the correlations of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and modified early warning score (MEWS) points with the prognosis of patients with LC complicated with SS.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 426 LC cases from February 2019 to April 2022. Of them, 225 cases that were complicated with SS were assigned to the LC + SS group, and 201 simple LC cases were included in the LC group. Intergroup differences in MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were compared, as well as their diagnostic value for LC + SS. The correlations of the three scores with the prognosis of patients with LC + SS were further analyzed, as well as the related risk factors affecting patients' outcomes, after the follow-up investigation.

Results: MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were all higher in the LC + SS group vs the LC group, and their combined assessment for LC + SS revealed a diagnostic sensitivity and a specificity of 89.66% and 90.84%, respectively (P < 0.05). The LC + SS group reported 58 deaths, with an overall mortality rate of 25.78%. Deceased patients presented higher MELD, SOFA, and MEWS points than those who survived (P < 0.05). MELD, SOFA, and MEWS scores were determined by COX analysis as factors independently affecting the prognosis of patients with LC + SS (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: MELD, SOFA, and MEWS effectively diagnosed LC in patients complicated with SS, and they demonstrated great significance in assessing prognosis, which provides a reliable prognosis guarantee for patients with LC + SS. However, their assessment effects remain limited, which is worthy of further investigation by more in-depth and rigorous experimental analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信