{"title":"治疗相关性急性早幼粒细胞白血病和新生急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者异基因造血细胞移植的比较分析 一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Satoshi Yamasaki, Masamitsu Yanada, Hiroaki Araie, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshinobu Kanda, Haruko Tashiro, Naoyuki Uchida, Kazutaka Ozeki, Shuichi Ota, Yasushi Onishi, Noriko Doki, Tatsuo Oyake, Satoru Takada, Masatoshi Sakurai, Yukio Kondo, Hirohisa Nakamae, Toshiro Kawakita, Makoto Onizuka, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takaaki Konuma","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95471-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an alternative treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), little is known regarding the utility of allogeneic HCT for R/R therapy-related APL (t-APL). We retrospectively analyzed data for 144 patients with APL (t-APL, n = 20 and de novo APL, n = 124) who received a first allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2020. We found no significant differences in survival between the t-APL and de novo APL groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53.8% in the t-APL group and 52.4% in the de novo APL group. However, as previously reported, patients without complete remission (CR) at HCT had significantly worse OS than those with CR (P = 0.004). The 3-year OS rates were 61.1% in patients with CR and 36.5% in those without CR. These findings suggest that allogeneic HCT may be considered a viable treatment option for patients with t-APL and de novo APL, with an emphasis on achieving CR before transplantation to optimize outcomes. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential for worse outcomes in male patients and those with lower performance status, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches and careful patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with therapy-related and de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Yamasaki, Masamitsu Yanada, Hiroaki Araie, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshinobu Kanda, Haruko Tashiro, Naoyuki Uchida, Kazutaka Ozeki, Shuichi Ota, Yasushi Onishi, Noriko Doki, Tatsuo Oyake, Satoru Takada, Masatoshi Sakurai, Yukio Kondo, Hirohisa Nakamae, Toshiro Kawakita, Makoto Onizuka, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takaaki Konuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-95471-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an alternative treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), little is known regarding the utility of allogeneic HCT for R/R therapy-related APL (t-APL). We retrospectively analyzed data for 144 patients with APL (t-APL, n = 20 and de novo APL, n = 124) who received a first allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2020. We found no significant differences in survival between the t-APL and de novo APL groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53.8% in the t-APL group and 52.4% in the de novo APL group. However, as previously reported, patients without complete remission (CR) at HCT had significantly worse OS than those with CR (P = 0.004). The 3-year OS rates were 61.1% in patients with CR and 36.5% in those without CR. These findings suggest that allogeneic HCT may be considered a viable treatment option for patients with t-APL and de novo APL, with an emphasis on achieving CR before transplantation to optimize outcomes. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential for worse outcomes in male patients and those with lower performance status, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches and careful patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958742/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95471-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95471-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)是复发或难治性(R/R)急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的一种替代治疗方法,但对于同种异体造血细胞移植治疗与R/R治疗相关的APL (t-APL)的实用性知之甚少。我们回顾性分析了144例2008年至2020年间首次接受同种异体HCT的APL患者(t-APL, n = 20,新生APL, n = 124)的数据。我们发现t-APL组和新生APL组的生存率无显著差异。t-APL组3年总生存率(OS)为53.8%,新发APL组为52.4%。然而,正如先前报道的那样,HCT无完全缓解(CR)患者的OS明显比有CR的患者差(P = 0.004)。CR患者的3年OS率为61.1%,无CR患者的3年OS率为36.5%。这些研究结果表明,同种异体HCT可能被认为是t-APL和新生APL患者的可行治疗选择,重点是在移植前实现CR以优化结果。然而,临床医生应该意识到男性患者和那些表现较差的患者可能出现更糟糕的结果,强调个性化治疗方法和仔细选择患者的必要性。
Comparative analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with therapy-related and de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia A retrospective study.
Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an alternative treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), little is known regarding the utility of allogeneic HCT for R/R therapy-related APL (t-APL). We retrospectively analyzed data for 144 patients with APL (t-APL, n = 20 and de novo APL, n = 124) who received a first allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2020. We found no significant differences in survival between the t-APL and de novo APL groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53.8% in the t-APL group and 52.4% in the de novo APL group. However, as previously reported, patients without complete remission (CR) at HCT had significantly worse OS than those with CR (P = 0.004). The 3-year OS rates were 61.1% in patients with CR and 36.5% in those without CR. These findings suggest that allogeneic HCT may be considered a viable treatment option for patients with t-APL and de novo APL, with an emphasis on achieving CR before transplantation to optimize outcomes. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential for worse outcomes in male patients and those with lower performance status, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches and careful patient selection.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.