面对COVID-19大流行,专业社交媒体使用对拖延症和工作投入的影响

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/sjop.13111
Dicle Berfin Köse, Reetta Oksa, Nina Savela, Rita Latikka, Atte Oksanen
{"title":"面对COVID-19大流行,专业社交媒体使用对拖延症和工作投入的影响","authors":"Dicle Berfin Köse, Reetta Oksa, Nina Savela, Rita Latikka, Atte Oksanen","doi":"10.1111/sjop.13111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the interruptions induced by the COVID-19 pandemic for organizational practices globally, professional social media usage (PSMU) has increased, undergoing changes in its use patterns. During enforced remote work practices, work-leisure boundary management and digital communication have become crucial for employee efficiency. This study analyzed how PSMU affected remote workers' work engagement and procrastination from the perspectives of work-leisure boundary conflict and work-related and nonwork-related social media communication. Longitudinal data were collected from the Finnish working population, with the first wave conducted in March-April 2019 (N = 1,817) and the second wave, used in this study, conducted in March-April 2021 (N = 1,018). The data were analyzed via partial least squares path modeling using multi-group and longitudinal data analysis methods. The results showed that for remote workers during the pandemic, (1) nonwork-related social media communication and PSMU lost their significant effect on procrastination, (2) work-leisure boundary conflict had an increased negative effect on work engagement, and (3) nonwork-related social media communication's positive effect on work engagement increased. Our findings entail implications for the strategic use of PSMU in remote work practices. Theoretically, this study contributes by analyzing the longitudinal effects of technological affordances and by analyzing the effects of belongingness theory, work/family boundary theory, and role conflict theory on online mediums and in remote working contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":"654-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Professional Social Media Usage on Procrastination and Work Engagement in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Dicle Berfin Köse, Reetta Oksa, Nina Savela, Rita Latikka, Atte Oksanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjop.13111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the interruptions induced by the COVID-19 pandemic for organizational practices globally, professional social media usage (PSMU) has increased, undergoing changes in its use patterns. During enforced remote work practices, work-leisure boundary management and digital communication have become crucial for employee efficiency. This study analyzed how PSMU affected remote workers' work engagement and procrastination from the perspectives of work-leisure boundary conflict and work-related and nonwork-related social media communication. Longitudinal data were collected from the Finnish working population, with the first wave conducted in March-April 2019 (N = 1,817) and the second wave, used in this study, conducted in March-April 2021 (N = 1,018). The data were analyzed via partial least squares path modeling using multi-group and longitudinal data analysis methods. The results showed that for remote workers during the pandemic, (1) nonwork-related social media communication and PSMU lost their significant effect on procrastination, (2) work-leisure boundary conflict had an increased negative effect on work engagement, and (3) nonwork-related social media communication's positive effect on work engagement increased. Our findings entail implications for the strategic use of PSMU in remote work practices. Theoretically, this study contributes by analyzing the longitudinal effects of technological affordances and by analyzing the effects of belongingness theory, work/family boundary theory, and role conflict theory on online mediums and in remote working contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"654-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球组织实践造成的中断,专业社交媒体的使用(PSMU)有所增加,其使用模式正在发生变化。在强制远程工作实践中,工作-休闲边界管理和数字通信对员工效率至关重要。本研究从工作-休闲边界冲突和工作与非工作相关的社交媒体传播角度分析了PSMU对远程工作者工作投入和拖延的影响。从芬兰工作人口中收集纵向数据,第一波在2019年3月至4月进行(N = 1,817),第二波在2021年3月至4月进行(N = 1,018)。采用多组和纵向数据分析方法,通过偏最小二乘路径建模对数据进行分析。结果表明,疫情期间远程工作者的工作拖延效应显著减弱,工作-休闲边界冲突对工作投入的负面影响增强,与工作无关的社交媒体传播对工作投入的积极影响增强。我们的研究结果对PSMU在远程工作实践中的战略性使用具有启示意义。从理论上讲,本研究通过分析技术支持的纵向效应,以及归属理论、工作/家庭边界理论和角色冲突理论对在线媒介和远程工作环境的影响作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Professional Social Media Usage on Procrastination and Work Engagement in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Given the interruptions induced by the COVID-19 pandemic for organizational practices globally, professional social media usage (PSMU) has increased, undergoing changes in its use patterns. During enforced remote work practices, work-leisure boundary management and digital communication have become crucial for employee efficiency. This study analyzed how PSMU affected remote workers' work engagement and procrastination from the perspectives of work-leisure boundary conflict and work-related and nonwork-related social media communication. Longitudinal data were collected from the Finnish working population, with the first wave conducted in March-April 2019 (N = 1,817) and the second wave, used in this study, conducted in March-April 2021 (N = 1,018). The data were analyzed via partial least squares path modeling using multi-group and longitudinal data analysis methods. The results showed that for remote workers during the pandemic, (1) nonwork-related social media communication and PSMU lost their significant effect on procrastination, (2) work-leisure boundary conflict had an increased negative effect on work engagement, and (3) nonwork-related social media communication's positive effect on work engagement increased. Our findings entail implications for the strategic use of PSMU in remote work practices. Theoretically, this study contributes by analyzing the longitudinal effects of technological affordances and by analyzing the effects of belongingness theory, work/family boundary theory, and role conflict theory on online mediums and in remote working contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信