乳腺癌暴露免疫反应异质性研究:一项系统评价方案。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320498
Amene Saghazadeh
{"title":"乳腺癌暴露免疫反应异质性研究:一项系统评价方案。","authors":"Amene Saghazadeh","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation is a treatment modality of interest in both palliative and curative settings for patients with breast cancer (BC). Despite many advances in radiation oncology, anti-radiation resistance remains a problem in mechanistic aspects. Studies show that immune cells respond to radiation in a heterogeneous manner and suggest the determinant role of these responses in the ultimate clinical classification of patients with BC as anti-radiation resistant/sensitive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A systematic review of in vivo and in vitro studies will be defined here to assess the radiation response of immune cells in BC comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>A systematic search for in vivo and in vitro studies will collect studies that compare the radiation alone-treated and control (untreated or sham) subjects, as well as subjects treated with radiation in combination and subjects treated with radiation alone. The primary outcome of interest will be measures of the abundance of immune cell subsets. The secondary outcomes will include measures derived from co-culture assays leading to immunoregulatory roles or mechanisms proposed for the potential cross-talks between immune-BC cells that will be influenced by radiation. The review results will be primarily synthesized in a narrative and qualitative manner. Meta-analysis will be considered if there are three or more observations with data available for a specific outcome. We will use the SYRCLE \"Risk of Bias\" assessment tool for appraising the risk of bias in preclinical in vivo studies, and given the lack of standardized instruments for in vitro studies, we will design a checklist suitable for our specific in vitro research questions and publish it along with our systematic review.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0320498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of heterogeneity in immune responses to exposure in breast cancer: A protocol for a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Amene Saghazadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0320498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation is a treatment modality of interest in both palliative and curative settings for patients with breast cancer (BC). Despite many advances in radiation oncology, anti-radiation resistance remains a problem in mechanistic aspects. Studies show that immune cells respond to radiation in a heterogeneous manner and suggest the determinant role of these responses in the ultimate clinical classification of patients with BC as anti-radiation resistant/sensitive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A systematic review of in vivo and in vitro studies will be defined here to assess the radiation response of immune cells in BC comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>A systematic search for in vivo and in vitro studies will collect studies that compare the radiation alone-treated and control (untreated or sham) subjects, as well as subjects treated with radiation in combination and subjects treated with radiation alone. The primary outcome of interest will be measures of the abundance of immune cell subsets. The secondary outcomes will include measures derived from co-culture assays leading to immunoregulatory roles or mechanisms proposed for the potential cross-talks between immune-BC cells that will be influenced by radiation. The review results will be primarily synthesized in a narrative and qualitative manner. Meta-analysis will be considered if there are three or more observations with data available for a specific outcome. We will use the SYRCLE \\\"Risk of Bias\\\" assessment tool for appraising the risk of bias in preclinical in vivo studies, and given the lack of standardized instruments for in vitro studies, we will design a checklist suitable for our specific in vitro research questions and publish it along with our systematic review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"e0320498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320498\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于乳腺癌(BC)患者,放射治疗是一种治疗方式,无论是姑息治疗还是治愈治疗。尽管放射肿瘤学取得了许多进展,但抗辐射耐药仍然是机制方面的问题。研究表明,免疫细胞对辐射的反应是不均匀的,并提示这些反应在BC患者抗辐射耐药/敏感的最终临床分类中起决定性作用。目的:本文将对体内和体外研究进行系统回顾,以全面评估BC中免疫细胞的辐射反应。方法/设计:对体内和体外研究进行系统搜索,将收集比较单独放疗和对照(未治疗或假)受试者,以及联合放疗和单独放疗受试者的研究。感兴趣的主要结果将是免疫细胞亚群丰度的测量。次要结果将包括来自共培养试验的测量结果,导致免疫调节作用或对受辐射影响的免疫- bc细胞之间潜在交叉对话提出的机制。审查结果将主要以叙述和定性的方式综合。如果有三个或更多的观测数据可用于特定结果,则考虑进行荟萃分析。我们将使用sycle“偏倚风险”评估工具来评估临床前体内研究的偏倚风险,鉴于缺乏标准化的体外研究工具,我们将设计一份适合我们特定体外研究问题的清单,并将其与我们的系统综述一起发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Study of heterogeneity in immune responses to exposure in breast cancer: A protocol for a systematic review.

Study of heterogeneity in immune responses to exposure in breast cancer: A protocol for a systematic review.

Study of heterogeneity in immune responses to exposure in breast cancer: A protocol for a systematic review.

Study of heterogeneity in immune responses to exposure in breast cancer: A protocol for a systematic review.

Background: Radiation is a treatment modality of interest in both palliative and curative settings for patients with breast cancer (BC). Despite many advances in radiation oncology, anti-radiation resistance remains a problem in mechanistic aspects. Studies show that immune cells respond to radiation in a heterogeneous manner and suggest the determinant role of these responses in the ultimate clinical classification of patients with BC as anti-radiation resistant/sensitive.

Objective: A systematic review of in vivo and in vitro studies will be defined here to assess the radiation response of immune cells in BC comprehensively.

Methods/design: A systematic search for in vivo and in vitro studies will collect studies that compare the radiation alone-treated and control (untreated or sham) subjects, as well as subjects treated with radiation in combination and subjects treated with radiation alone. The primary outcome of interest will be measures of the abundance of immune cell subsets. The secondary outcomes will include measures derived from co-culture assays leading to immunoregulatory roles or mechanisms proposed for the potential cross-talks between immune-BC cells that will be influenced by radiation. The review results will be primarily synthesized in a narrative and qualitative manner. Meta-analysis will be considered if there are three or more observations with data available for a specific outcome. We will use the SYRCLE "Risk of Bias" assessment tool for appraising the risk of bias in preclinical in vivo studies, and given the lack of standardized instruments for in vitro studies, we will design a checklist suitable for our specific in vitro research questions and publish it along with our systematic review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信