Jeremy F Mills, Andrew L Gray, Eugene W Wang, Kelly M Chroback
{"title":"不同在押罪犯群体犯罪态度与关联测度的大样本因子分析。","authors":"Jeremy F Mills, Andrew L Gray, Eugene W Wang, Kelly M Chroback","doi":"10.1037/pas0001364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antisocial attitudes and associates are central constructs related to antisocial and criminal behavior. The self-report Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) has grown in application within the literature over the past 2 decades. However, tests of the MCAA's factor structure can best be described as preliminary, and there has been no test of measurement invariance. For the present study, we examined the reliability and construct validity of the MCAA in a diverse sample of incarcerated adults in the state of Texas (N = 72,099). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we examined the underlying factor structure and tested for measurement invariance across sex, race/ethnicity, and demand characteristics. Our results supported the original four-factor structure of the MCAA, with measurement invariance being demonstrated across sex (i.e., male vs. female), race/ethnicity (i.e., Black non-Hispanic, White Hispanic, White non-Hispanic), and demand characteristics (i.e., mandated vs. voluntary treatment). Modest associations between the MCAA and criminal history variables were observed, with between-group differences yielding small effect sizes. Overall, our findings provide strong support for the four-factor structure and measurement invariance of the MCAA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"37 4","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A large sample factor analysis of the Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates in a diverse population of incarcerated offenders.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy F Mills, Andrew L Gray, Eugene W Wang, Kelly M Chroback\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pas0001364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antisocial attitudes and associates are central constructs related to antisocial and criminal behavior. The self-report Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) has grown in application within the literature over the past 2 decades. However, tests of the MCAA's factor structure can best be described as preliminary, and there has been no test of measurement invariance. For the present study, we examined the reliability and construct validity of the MCAA in a diverse sample of incarcerated adults in the state of Texas (N = 72,099). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we examined the underlying factor structure and tested for measurement invariance across sex, race/ethnicity, and demand characteristics. Our results supported the original four-factor structure of the MCAA, with measurement invariance being demonstrated across sex (i.e., male vs. female), race/ethnicity (i.e., Black non-Hispanic, White Hispanic, White non-Hispanic), and demand characteristics (i.e., mandated vs. voluntary treatment). Modest associations between the MCAA and criminal history variables were observed, with between-group differences yielding small effect sizes. Overall, our findings provide strong support for the four-factor structure and measurement invariance of the MCAA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"137-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001364\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
反社会态度和联想是与反社会和犯罪行为相关的核心构念。在过去的20年里,犯罪态度和联系的自我报告测量(MCAA)在文献中的应用越来越广泛。然而,对MCAA的因素结构的测试只能被描述为初步的,并且没有测量不变性的测试。在本研究中,我们在德克萨斯州不同的被监禁成年人样本(N = 72,099)中检验了MCAA的信度和结构效度。使用验证性因子分析,我们检查了潜在的因素结构,并测试了性别、种族/民族和需求特征之间的测量不变性。我们的研究结果支持了MCAA最初的四因素结构,在性别(即男性与女性)、种族/民族(即非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔白人)和需求特征(即强制治疗与自愿治疗)之间证明了测量不变性。观察到MCAA和犯罪史变量之间的适度关联,组间差异产生较小的效应量。总体而言,我们的研究结果为MCAA的四因素结构和测量不变性提供了强有力的支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
A large sample factor analysis of the Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates in a diverse population of incarcerated offenders.
Antisocial attitudes and associates are central constructs related to antisocial and criminal behavior. The self-report Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) has grown in application within the literature over the past 2 decades. However, tests of the MCAA's factor structure can best be described as preliminary, and there has been no test of measurement invariance. For the present study, we examined the reliability and construct validity of the MCAA in a diverse sample of incarcerated adults in the state of Texas (N = 72,099). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we examined the underlying factor structure and tested for measurement invariance across sex, race/ethnicity, and demand characteristics. Our results supported the original four-factor structure of the MCAA, with measurement invariance being demonstrated across sex (i.e., male vs. female), race/ethnicity (i.e., Black non-Hispanic, White Hispanic, White non-Hispanic), and demand characteristics (i.e., mandated vs. voluntary treatment). Modest associations between the MCAA and criminal history variables were observed, with between-group differences yielding small effect sizes. Overall, our findings provide strong support for the four-factor structure and measurement invariance of the MCAA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews