IF 16.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Franziska Miegel, Jakob Scheunemann, Saskia Pampuch, Josephine Schultz, Bjarne Hansen, Kristen Hagen, Jürgen Gallinat, Antonia Zapf, Amir H Yassari, Lena Jelinek
{"title":"Exploring the Black Box: What Happens During Brief Concentrated Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder?","authors":"Franziska Miegel, Jakob Scheunemann, Saskia Pampuch, Josephine Schultz, Bjarne Hansen, Kristen Hagen, Jürgen Gallinat, Antonia Zapf, Amir H Yassari, Lena Jelinek","doi":"10.1159/000545178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief concentrated exposure and response prevention (cERP) has shown promise as an efficacious treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). with higher response and remission rates compared to the first-line treatment. However, the mechanisms driving this success remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal study included 56 patients with OCD who underwent cERP (Bergen four-day treatment; B4DT). Treatment mechanisms (e.g., willingness to engage in ERP, confidence in future self-guided ERP, leaning into anxiety) were assessed before and after each of the four treatment days by the Pre- and Post-Session Questionnaire (PPSQ-cERP). Changes in the PPSQ-cERP were used to predict treatment response assessed from baseline to post-treatment and three-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All variables assessed by the PPSQ-cERP showed improvement throughout the cERP, as calculated using linear mixed models. Several variables, including willingness to engage in ERP and self-efficacy, improved after day 3, with small to medium effects (0.34-0.70). Confidence in future self-guided ERP improved on day 4 (the day on which it was addressed), with a small effect (0.31). Leaning into anxiety during ERP tasks on day 3 was identified as a predictor of OCD symptom improvement ( = 0.516, p = .050) by lasso regression, while group cohesion reached trend level ( = 0.239, p = .081).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights day-specific effects across all treatment mechanism variables. Notably, leaning into anxiety during ERP tasks was a key predictor of symptom improvement, offering new insights into refining OCD treatment strategies and enhancing clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:简短集中暴露和反应预防(cERP)已被证明是治疗强迫症(OCD)的有效方法,与一线治疗相比,其反应率和缓解率更高。然而,这种成功的驱动机制仍不清楚:这项纵向研究纳入了 56 名接受 cERP(卑尔根四天疗法;B4DT)治疗的强迫症患者。治疗机制(如参与ERP的意愿、对未来自我指导ERP的信心、对焦虑的倾诉)在四个治疗日前后分别通过会前和会后问卷(PPSQ-cERP)进行评估。PPSQ-cERP的变化被用来预测从基线到治疗后以及三个月随访期间的治疗反应:结果:根据线性混合模型的计算,PPSQ-cERP 评估的所有变量在整个 cERP 中都有所改善。包括参与 ERP 的意愿和自我效能感在内的几个变量在第 3 天后得到了改善,并产生了小到中等的影响(0.34-0.70)。在第 4 天(这一天的主题),对未来自我指导的企业资源规划的信心有所提高,效果很小(0.31)。通过套索回归,第3天ERP任务中的焦虑倾向被确定为强迫症症状改善的预测因素( = 0.516,p = .050),而团体凝聚力达到了趋势水平( = 0.239,p = .081)。结论:本研究强调了所有治疗机制变量的特定日效应。值得注意的是,ERP任务中的焦虑倾向是症状改善的关键预测因素,这为完善强迫症治疗策略和提高临床疗效提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Black Box: What Happens During Brief Concentrated Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder?

Background: Brief concentrated exposure and response prevention (cERP) has shown promise as an efficacious treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). with higher response and remission rates compared to the first-line treatment. However, the mechanisms driving this success remain unclear.

Methods: This longitudinal study included 56 patients with OCD who underwent cERP (Bergen four-day treatment; B4DT). Treatment mechanisms (e.g., willingness to engage in ERP, confidence in future self-guided ERP, leaning into anxiety) were assessed before and after each of the four treatment days by the Pre- and Post-Session Questionnaire (PPSQ-cERP). Changes in the PPSQ-cERP were used to predict treatment response assessed from baseline to post-treatment and three-month follow-up.

Results: All variables assessed by the PPSQ-cERP showed improvement throughout the cERP, as calculated using linear mixed models. Several variables, including willingness to engage in ERP and self-efficacy, improved after day 3, with small to medium effects (0.34-0.70). Confidence in future self-guided ERP improved on day 4 (the day on which it was addressed), with a small effect (0.31). Leaning into anxiety during ERP tasks on day 3 was identified as a predictor of OCD symptom improvement ( = 0.516, p = .050) by lasso regression, while group cohesion reached trend level ( = 0.239, p = .081).

Conclusion: This study highlights day-specific effects across all treatment mechanism variables. Notably, leaning into anxiety during ERP tasks was a key predictor of symptom improvement, offering new insights into refining OCD treatment strategies and enhancing clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信