右美托咪定辅助静脉吸入联合全麻在腹腔镜微创腹股沟疝手术中的镇痛效果及安全性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Qian-Xing Lou, Ke-Ping Xu
{"title":"右美托咪定辅助静脉吸入联合全麻在腹腔镜微创腹股沟疝手术中的镇痛效果及安全性。","authors":"Qian-Xing Lou, Ke-Ping Xu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 94 patients scheduled for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia, admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital between May 2022 and May 2023, were divided into a control group (inhalation combined general anesthesia) and a treatment group (dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia). Perioperative indicators, analgesic effect, preoperative and postoperative 24-hours blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), stress indicators, immune function levels, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data, including age, hernia location, place of residence, weight, monthly income, education level, and underlying diseases, were not significantly different between the two groups, indicating comparability (<i>P</i> > 0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the treatment group exhibited a shorter postoperative urinary catheter removal time and hospital stay than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Preoperatively, no significant differences were found in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, at 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively, the treatment group had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Although no significant differences in preoperative hemodynamic indicators were found between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05), both groups experienced some extent of changes in postoperative HR, diastolic BP (DBP), and systolic BP (SBP). Nevertheless, the treatment group showed smaller changes in HR, DBP, and SBP than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Preoperative immune function indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, postoperatively, the treatment group demonstrated higher levels of CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>, and CD4+/CD8<sup>+</sup> and lower levels of CD8<sup>+</sup> than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The rates of adverse reactions were 6.38% and 23.40% in the treatment and control groups, respectively, revealing a significant difference (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 5.371, <i>P</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia can promote early recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia. It ensures stable blood flow, improves postoperative analgesic effects, reduces postoperative pain intensity, alleviates stress response, improves immune function, facilitates anesthesia recovery, and enhances safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"99597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Qian-Xing Lou, Ke-Ping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 94 patients scheduled for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia, admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital between May 2022 and May 2023, were divided into a control group (inhalation combined general anesthesia) and a treatment group (dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia). Perioperative indicators, analgesic effect, preoperative and postoperative 24-hours blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), stress indicators, immune function levels, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data, including age, hernia location, place of residence, weight, monthly income, education level, and underlying diseases, were not significantly different between the two groups, indicating comparability (<i>P</i> > 0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the treatment group exhibited a shorter postoperative urinary catheter removal time and hospital stay than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Preoperatively, no significant differences were found in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, at 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively, the treatment group had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Although no significant differences in preoperative hemodynamic indicators were found between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05), both groups experienced some extent of changes in postoperative HR, diastolic BP (DBP), and systolic BP (SBP). Nevertheless, the treatment group showed smaller changes in HR, DBP, and SBP than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Preoperative immune function indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, postoperatively, the treatment group demonstrated higher levels of CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>, and CD4+/CD8<sup>+</sup> and lower levels of CD8<sup>+</sup> than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The rates of adverse reactions were 6.38% and 23.40% in the treatment and control groups, respectively, revealing a significant difference (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 5.371, <i>P</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia can promote early recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia. It ensures stable blood flow, improves postoperative analgesic effects, reduces postoperative pain intensity, alleviates stress response, improves immune function, facilitates anesthesia recovery, and enhances safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"99597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99597\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:探讨右美托咪定辅助静脉吸入联合全身麻醉在腹股沟疝腹腔镜微创手术中的镇痛效果和安全性:在这项回顾性研究中,将义乌市中心医院在2022年5月至2023年5月期间收治的94例腹股沟疝腹腔镜微创手术患者分为对照组(吸入联合全身麻醉)和治疗组(右美托咪定辅助静脉-吸入联合全身麻醉)。比较两组围术期指标、镇痛效果、术前和术后24小时血压(BP)和心率(HR)、应激指标、免疫功能水平和不良反应:两组患者的年龄、疝气位置、居住地、体重、月收入、受教育程度和基础疾病等基线数据无显著差异,具有可比性(P>0.05)。两组的手术时间和麻醉时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。然而,治疗组术后拔除导尿管的时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P < 0.05)。术前,两组患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分无明显差异(P > 0.05)。但在术后 12、18 和 24 小时,治疗组的 VAS 评分明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。虽然两组患者术前血液动力学指标无明显差异(P > 0.05),但两组患者术后心率、舒张压(DBP)和收缩压(SBP)都发生了一定程度的变化。然而,治疗组的心率、舒张压和收缩压变化均小于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组患者术前免疫功能指标无明显差异(P > 0.05)。但在术后,治疗组的 CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+ 水平高于对照组,CD8+ 水平低于对照组(P < 0.05)。治疗组和对照组的不良反应发生率分别为6.38%和23.40%,差异显著(χ 2 = 5.371,P = 0.020):结论:右美托咪定辅助静脉吸入联合全身麻醉可促进腹腔镜腹股沟疝微创手术患者的早日康复。结论:右美托咪定辅助静脉吸入联合全身麻醉可促进腹股沟疝腹腔镜微创手术患者早日康复,确保血流稳定,改善术后镇痛效果,降低术后疼痛强度,缓解应激反应,改善免疫功能,促进麻醉恢复,提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery.

Background: Currently, very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.

Aim: To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 94 patients scheduled for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia, admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital between May 2022 and May 2023, were divided into a control group (inhalation combined general anesthesia) and a treatment group (dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia). Perioperative indicators, analgesic effect, preoperative and postoperative 24-hours blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), stress indicators, immune function levels, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results: Baseline data, including age, hernia location, place of residence, weight, monthly income, education level, and underlying diseases, were not significantly different between the two groups, indicating comparability (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the treatment group exhibited a shorter postoperative urinary catheter removal time and hospital stay than the control group (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, no significant differences were found in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, at 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively, the treatment group had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in preoperative hemodynamic indicators were found between the two groups (P > 0.05), both groups experienced some extent of changes in postoperative HR, diastolic BP (DBP), and systolic BP (SBP). Nevertheless, the treatment group showed smaller changes in HR, DBP, and SBP than the control group (P < 0.05). Preoperative immune function indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, postoperatively, the treatment group demonstrated higher levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ and lower levels of CD8+ than the control group (P < 0.05). The rates of adverse reactions were 6.38% and 23.40% in the treatment and control groups, respectively, revealing a significant difference (χ 2 = 5.371, P = 0.020).

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia can promote early recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia. It ensures stable blood flow, improves postoperative analgesic effects, reduces postoperative pain intensity, alleviates stress response, improves immune function, facilitates anesthesia recovery, and enhances safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信