Micaela Hamer , Vanina Saraullo , Emiliano Muschetto , Micaela Esteban , Mariel Alejandra Tripodi , Cristina Sánchez , Diego Hancke , Olga Virginia Suárez , Bibiana Brihuega , Mara Leila Martínez
{"title":"用环介导的等温扩增技术监测合群啮齿动物的钩端螺旋体宿主。","authors":"Micaela Hamer , Vanina Saraullo , Emiliano Muschetto , Micaela Esteban , Mariel Alejandra Tripodi , Cristina Sánchez , Diego Hancke , Olga Virginia Suárez , Bibiana Brihuega , Mara Leila Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic <em>Leptospira</em> spp., represents a major public health concern due to its impact on both rural and urban populations. Rodents, particularly <em>Rattus norvegicus</em>, <em>Rattus rattus</em>, and <em>Mus musculus</em>, are key reservoirs, excreting leptospires in their urine and contributing to environmental contamination. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a molecular diagnostic tool, for detecting leptospiral DNA in kidney samples from captured rodents. LAMP results were compared with the standard <em>lipL32</em> PCR assay. Leptospiral DNA was detected in 9.0 % (14/156) of samples, with 5.8 % positive by both LAMP and <em>lipL32</em> PCR and 3.2 % positive by LAMP alone. No samples were positive by PCR and negative by LAMP. Cohen's Kappa index (0.77) indicated substantial agreement between the two methods. The higher sensitivity of LAMP, its ability to detect both pathogenic and intermediate leptospiral strains, and its cost-effectiveness make it a valuable tool for low-resource settings. However, the technique’s inability to differentiate between <em>Leptospira</em> species highlights the need for complementary methods for epidemiological studies. These findings contribute to the understanding of rodent leptospirosis reservoirs and offer practical diagnostic solutions for veterinary and public health surveillance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23505,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary journal","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveillance of leptospiral reservoirs in synanthropic rodents using loop-mediated isothermal amplification\",\"authors\":\"Micaela Hamer , Vanina Saraullo , Emiliano Muschetto , Micaela Esteban , Mariel Alejandra Tripodi , Cristina Sánchez , Diego Hancke , Olga Virginia Suárez , Bibiana Brihuega , Mara Leila Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic <em>Leptospira</em> spp., represents a major public health concern due to its impact on both rural and urban populations. Rodents, particularly <em>Rattus norvegicus</em>, <em>Rattus rattus</em>, and <em>Mus musculus</em>, are key reservoirs, excreting leptospires in their urine and contributing to environmental contamination. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a molecular diagnostic tool, for detecting leptospiral DNA in kidney samples from captured rodents. LAMP results were compared with the standard <em>lipL32</em> PCR assay. Leptospiral DNA was detected in 9.0 % (14/156) of samples, with 5.8 % positive by both LAMP and <em>lipL32</em> PCR and 3.2 % positive by LAMP alone. No samples were positive by PCR and negative by LAMP. Cohen's Kappa index (0.77) indicated substantial agreement between the two methods. The higher sensitivity of LAMP, its ability to detect both pathogenic and intermediate leptospiral strains, and its cost-effectiveness make it a valuable tool for low-resource settings. However, the technique’s inability to differentiate between <em>Leptospira</em> species highlights the need for complementary methods for epidemiological studies. These findings contribute to the understanding of rodent leptospirosis reservoirs and offer practical diagnostic solutions for veterinary and public health surveillance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary journal\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023325000449\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023325000449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surveillance of leptospiral reservoirs in synanthropic rodents using loop-mediated isothermal amplification
Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp., represents a major public health concern due to its impact on both rural and urban populations. Rodents, particularly Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rattus, and Mus musculus, are key reservoirs, excreting leptospires in their urine and contributing to environmental contamination. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a molecular diagnostic tool, for detecting leptospiral DNA in kidney samples from captured rodents. LAMP results were compared with the standard lipL32 PCR assay. Leptospiral DNA was detected in 9.0 % (14/156) of samples, with 5.8 % positive by both LAMP and lipL32 PCR and 3.2 % positive by LAMP alone. No samples were positive by PCR and negative by LAMP. Cohen's Kappa index (0.77) indicated substantial agreement between the two methods. The higher sensitivity of LAMP, its ability to detect both pathogenic and intermediate leptospiral strains, and its cost-effectiveness make it a valuable tool for low-resource settings. However, the technique’s inability to differentiate between Leptospira species highlights the need for complementary methods for epidemiological studies. These findings contribute to the understanding of rodent leptospirosis reservoirs and offer practical diagnostic solutions for veterinary and public health surveillance.
期刊介绍:
The Veterinary Journal (established 1875) publishes worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and its related subjects. It provides regular book reviews and a short communications section. The journal regularly commissions topical reviews and commentaries on features of major importance. Research areas include infectious diseases, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology and oncology.