对影响转移性乳腺癌妇女参与数字心理健康干预的因素进行定性探索:寻找我的方式-高级。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephanie Bourboulis, Emma Kemp, Lisa Beatty
{"title":"对影响转移性乳腺癌妇女参与数字心理健康干预的因素进行定性探索:寻找我的方式-高级。","authors":"Stephanie Bourboulis, Emma Kemp, Lisa Beatty","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09379-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may improve access to timely support for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), scant research exists on how metastatic survivors engage with these programs and what factors impact usage. This study therefore qualitatively explored barriers and facilitators influencing engagement with (a) digital resources (e.g., information websites) generally and (b) in particular, Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), an interactive self-directed DMHI containing psychoeducation, therapeutic activities, and multimedia content tailored for women with MBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty women with MBC, who received either the FMW-A 6-week intervention (n = 13) or a digital-resource control (n = 7) as part of a larger RCT, participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded using framework analysis against three domains of Bowen's feasibility framework (acceptability, demand, practicality).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Engagement was high among intervention participants overall (six modules completed n = 3; five n = 5; four n = 1; two n = 4). Five overarching themes were identified. Three a priori domains related to FMW-A have high acceptability and practicality, but some demand barriers. Two inductively derived themes related to varied perceptions of navigability/layout and deriving personal benefits/impact. Key subtheme facilitators were program satisfaction, convenience, experiencing personal benefits/impact, and ease of navigation. Subtheme barriers were technical access barriers, experiencing time burden, and suboptimal intervention timing relative to time since diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that while many DMHI facilitators and barriers are consistent with those identified in curatively treated settings, some factors become more salient in metastatic populations (e.g., time burden). This research also offers novel insights that deriving early personal benefit promotes engagement and provides targets for future program improvements to address navigation and optimal-timing challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 4","pages":"333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative exploration of factors that influence engagement with a digital mental health intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Bourboulis, Emma Kemp, Lisa Beatty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09379-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may improve access to timely support for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), scant research exists on how metastatic survivors engage with these programs and what factors impact usage. This study therefore qualitatively explored barriers and facilitators influencing engagement with (a) digital resources (e.g., information websites) generally and (b) in particular, Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), an interactive self-directed DMHI containing psychoeducation, therapeutic activities, and multimedia content tailored for women with MBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty women with MBC, who received either the FMW-A 6-week intervention (n = 13) or a digital-resource control (n = 7) as part of a larger RCT, participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded using framework analysis against three domains of Bowen's feasibility framework (acceptability, demand, practicality).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Engagement was high among intervention participants overall (six modules completed n = 3; five n = 5; four n = 1; two n = 4). Five overarching themes were identified. Three a priori domains related to FMW-A have high acceptability and practicality, but some demand barriers. Two inductively derived themes related to varied perceptions of navigability/layout and deriving personal benefits/impact. Key subtheme facilitators were program satisfaction, convenience, experiencing personal benefits/impact, and ease of navigation. Subtheme barriers were technical access barriers, experiencing time burden, and suboptimal intervention timing relative to time since diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that while many DMHI facilitators and barriers are consistent with those identified in curatively treated settings, some factors become more salient in metastatic populations (e.g., time burden). This research also offers novel insights that deriving early personal benefit promotes engagement and provides targets for future program improvements to address navigation and optimal-timing challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09379-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09379-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然数字心理健康干预(DMHI)可以改善转移性乳腺癌(MBC)妇女获得及时支持的机会,但关于转移性乳腺癌幸存者如何参与这些计划以及影响使用的因素的研究很少。因此,本研究定性地探讨了影响参与(a)一般数字资源(如信息网站)和(b)特别是(FMW-A)的障碍和促进因素,这是一个互动式自我指导的DMHI,包含心理教育、治疗活动和为患有MBC的妇女量身定制的多媒体内容。方法:20名患有MBC的妇女,接受FMW-A 6周干预(n = 13)或数字资源控制(n = 7)作为更大的随机对照试验的一部分,参加了半结构化访谈。使用针对Bowen可行性框架的三个领域(可接受性、需求、实用性)的框架分析对转录本进行编码。结果:干预参与者的整体参与度较高(完成6个模块n = 3;5 n = 5;4 n = 1;2 n = 4)。确定了五个总体主题。FMW-A相关的三个先验领域具有较高的可接受性和实用性,但存在一定的需求障碍。两个归纳衍生的主题与可导航性/布局和个人利益/影响的不同看法有关。关键的子主题促进因素是程序满意度、便利性、体验个人利益/影响和易于导航。次主题障碍包括技术准入障碍、经历时间负担和相对于诊断后时间的次优干预时机。结论:本研究证实,虽然许多DMHI促进因素和障碍与在治疗环境中确定的一致,但一些因素在转移性人群中变得更加突出(例如,时间负担)。这项研究还提供了新的见解,即获得早期的个人利益可以促进参与,并为未来的项目改进提供目标,以解决导航和最佳时机的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative exploration of factors that influence engagement with a digital mental health intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.

Purpose: While digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may improve access to timely support for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), scant research exists on how metastatic survivors engage with these programs and what factors impact usage. This study therefore qualitatively explored barriers and facilitators influencing engagement with (a) digital resources (e.g., information websites) generally and (b) in particular, Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), an interactive self-directed DMHI containing psychoeducation, therapeutic activities, and multimedia content tailored for women with MBC.

Methods: Twenty women with MBC, who received either the FMW-A 6-week intervention (n = 13) or a digital-resource control (n = 7) as part of a larger RCT, participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded using framework analysis against three domains of Bowen's feasibility framework (acceptability, demand, practicality).

Results: Engagement was high among intervention participants overall (six modules completed n = 3; five n = 5; four n = 1; two n = 4). Five overarching themes were identified. Three a priori domains related to FMW-A have high acceptability and practicality, but some demand barriers. Two inductively derived themes related to varied perceptions of navigability/layout and deriving personal benefits/impact. Key subtheme facilitators were program satisfaction, convenience, experiencing personal benefits/impact, and ease of navigation. Subtheme barriers were technical access barriers, experiencing time burden, and suboptimal intervention timing relative to time since diagnosis.

Conclusions: This study confirms that while many DMHI facilitators and barriers are consistent with those identified in curatively treated settings, some factors become more salient in metastatic populations (e.g., time burden). This research also offers novel insights that deriving early personal benefit promotes engagement and provides targets for future program improvements to address navigation and optimal-timing challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信