{"title":"基于定制网络视频的前庭康复对前庭功能减退患者的效果:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Tomohiko Kamo, Hirofumi Ogihara, Ryozo Tanaka, Masato Azami, Takumi Kato, Reiko Tsunoda, Hiroaki Fushiki","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The dizziness specialty clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The participants were diagnosed with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The study used a randomized controlled trial design, in which participants were randomly assigned to either the customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation or booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients were assessed at three time points: before-intervention (baseline), post-intervention completion (6 wk), and follow-up (12 wk). The primary outcome was the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the secondary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and tertiary outcomes included other functional and psychological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant time effect for the DGI score ( p < 0.0001). Comparing the post-intervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment, the customized web video-based VR group showed a significant increase in the DGI score. Time × group interaction effects were observed ( F = 5.739, p < 0.01). Both groups showed decreased DHI_total scores when comparing the postintervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment. No serious adverse events were reported during intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that customized web video-based VR improved DGI compared with booklet-based VR, and the intervention effect was maintained at 6-week follow-up. Additionally, the findings suggested that both interventions improve to a similar extent DHI. Therefore, vestibular rehabilitation with motion visualized by video may be more effective than that with still image by booklet.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"573-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Customized Web Video-Based Vestibular Rehabilitation for Patients With Vestibular Hypofunction: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiko Kamo, Hirofumi Ogihara, Ryozo Tanaka, Masato Azami, Takumi Kato, Reiko Tsunoda, Hiroaki Fushiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The dizziness specialty clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The participants were diagnosed with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The study used a randomized controlled trial design, in which participants were randomly assigned to either the customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation or booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients were assessed at three time points: before-intervention (baseline), post-intervention completion (6 wk), and follow-up (12 wk). The primary outcome was the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the secondary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and tertiary outcomes included other functional and psychological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant time effect for the DGI score ( p < 0.0001). Comparing the post-intervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment, the customized web video-based VR group showed a significant increase in the DGI score. Time × group interaction effects were observed ( F = 5.739, p < 0.01). Both groups showed decreased DHI_total scores when comparing the postintervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment. No serious adverse events were reported during intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that customized web video-based VR improved DGI compared with booklet-based VR, and the intervention effect was maintained at 6-week follow-up. Additionally, the findings suggested that both interventions improve to a similar extent DHI. Therefore, vestibular rehabilitation with motion visualized by video may be more effective than that with still image by booklet.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"573-580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨基于定制网络视频的前庭功能康复在慢性前庭功能减退患者中的效果。研究设计:本研究为随机对照试验。单位:眩晕专科门诊。患者:参与者被诊断为慢性前庭功能减退。干预措施:研究采用随机对照试验设计,参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到基于网络视频的定制前庭康复或基于小册子的前庭康复。主要结果测量:患者在三个时间点进行评估:干预前(基线),干预后完成(6周)和随访(12周)。主要终点是动态步态指数(DGI),次要终点是头晕障碍量表(DHI),第三终点包括其他功能和心理评估。结果:两组患者基线特征具有可比性。统计分析显示DGI评分存在显著的时间效应(p < 0.0001)。将干预后和随访评估与基线评估进行比较,基于定制网络视频的VR组的DGI评分显着增加。观察时间×组交互作用效应(F = 5.739, p < 0.01)。与基线评估相比,干预后和随访评估两组的DHI_total得分均有所下降。干预期间无严重不良事件发生。结论:本研究表明,与基于小册子的VR相比,基于定制网络视频的VR改善了DGI,并且在6周的随访中保持干预效果。此外,研究结果表明,两种干预措施对DHI的改善程度相似。因此,前庭神经系统运动影像的康复效果可能比静止影像的康复效果更好。
Effects of Customized Web Video-Based Vestibular Rehabilitation for Patients With Vestibular Hypofunction: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Objective: To investigate the effects of customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic vestibular hypofunction.
Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial.
Setting: The dizziness specialty clinic.
Patients: The participants were diagnosed with chronic vestibular hypofunction.
Interventions: The study used a randomized controlled trial design, in which participants were randomly assigned to either the customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation or booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation in a 1:1 ratio.
Main outcome measures: Patients were assessed at three time points: before-intervention (baseline), post-intervention completion (6 wk), and follow-up (12 wk). The primary outcome was the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the secondary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and tertiary outcomes included other functional and psychological assessments.
Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant time effect for the DGI score ( p < 0.0001). Comparing the post-intervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment, the customized web video-based VR group showed a significant increase in the DGI score. Time × group interaction effects were observed ( F = 5.739, p < 0.01). Both groups showed decreased DHI_total scores when comparing the postintervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment. No serious adverse events were reported during intervention period.
Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that customized web video-based VR improved DGI compared with booklet-based VR, and the intervention effect was maintained at 6-week follow-up. Additionally, the findings suggested that both interventions improve to a similar extent DHI. Therefore, vestibular rehabilitation with motion visualized by video may be more effective than that with still image by booklet.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.