{"title":"农作物收割后播种前可耕种土壤中大量的一氧化二氮排放。","authors":"Regine Maier, Lukas Hörtnagl, Nina Buchmann","doi":"10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global agriculture is the largest anthropogenic source for nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. During crop rotations, periods with arable soils without crops, thereafter called \"bare soils\" are often impossible to avoid after the crop is harvested, prior to sowing of the next crop. However, such periods are underrepresented in studies focussing on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Here, we present continuous, high-temporal-resolution N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes during bare soil periods after four major crops, using the eddy-covariance technique at two sites in Switzerland. Overall, periods with bare soil were net sources for N<sub>2</sub>O as well as for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). Daily average sums of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions varied between 10 ± 2 and 38 ± 5 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> d<sup>-1</sup> after the respective rapeseed, winter wheat, pea, and maize harvests. While CO<sub>2</sub> emissions contributed 86-96% to the total GHG budgets, N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes accounted for 2% after pea, but for 10-12% after rapeseed, winter wheat, and maize. In contrast, CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were negligible (< 2%). N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes during bare soil periods increased for all cropland sites with increasing water-filled pore space, particularly at high soil temperatures. Thus, our study emphasizes the significance of avoiding bare soil periods to mitigate N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from croplands.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":19336,"journal":{"name":"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems","volume":"130 2","pages":"161-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils after crop harvests prior to sowing.\",\"authors\":\"Regine Maier, Lukas Hörtnagl, Nina Buchmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global agriculture is the largest anthropogenic source for nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. During crop rotations, periods with arable soils without crops, thereafter called \\\"bare soils\\\" are often impossible to avoid after the crop is harvested, prior to sowing of the next crop. However, such periods are underrepresented in studies focussing on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Here, we present continuous, high-temporal-resolution N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes during bare soil periods after four major crops, using the eddy-covariance technique at two sites in Switzerland. Overall, periods with bare soil were net sources for N<sub>2</sub>O as well as for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). Daily average sums of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions varied between 10 ± 2 and 38 ± 5 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> d<sup>-1</sup> after the respective rapeseed, winter wheat, pea, and maize harvests. While CO<sub>2</sub> emissions contributed 86-96% to the total GHG budgets, N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes accounted for 2% after pea, but for 10-12% after rapeseed, winter wheat, and maize. In contrast, CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were negligible (< 2%). N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes during bare soil periods increased for all cropland sites with increasing water-filled pore space, particularly at high soil temperatures. Thus, our study emphasizes the significance of avoiding bare soil periods to mitigate N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from croplands.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems\",\"volume\":\"130 2\",\"pages\":\"161-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全球农业是一氧化二氮(N2O)排放的最大人为来源。在作物轮作期间,在作物收获后,在播种下一季作物之前,往往无法避免可耕种土壤没有作物的时期,因此称为“裸露土壤”。然而,在关注一氧化二氮排放的研究中,这些时期的代表性不足。在这里,我们使用涡旋协方差技术在瑞士的两个地点展示了四种主要作物种植后裸露土壤期间连续的高时间分辨率N2O通量。总体而言,土壤裸露期是N2O、二氧化碳和甲烷的净来源。在油菜、冬小麦、豌豆和玉米收获后,N2O的日平均排放量在10±2 ~ 38±5 g N2O- n ha-1 d-1之间变化。CO2排放占温室气体总收支的86-96%,而N2O通量在豌豆之后占2%,在油菜籽、冬小麦和玉米之后占10-12%。相比之下,CH4通量可以忽略不计(所有农田裸露土壤期的2O通量随着充水孔隙空间的增加而增加,特别是在土壤高温下。因此,我们的研究强调了避免裸露土壤期对减少农田N2O排放的重要性。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0获得。
Large nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils after crop harvests prior to sowing.
Global agriculture is the largest anthropogenic source for nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. During crop rotations, periods with arable soils without crops, thereafter called "bare soils" are often impossible to avoid after the crop is harvested, prior to sowing of the next crop. However, such periods are underrepresented in studies focussing on N2O emissions. Here, we present continuous, high-temporal-resolution N2O fluxes during bare soil periods after four major crops, using the eddy-covariance technique at two sites in Switzerland. Overall, periods with bare soil were net sources for N2O as well as for carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). Daily average sums of N2O emissions varied between 10 ± 2 and 38 ± 5 g N2O-N ha-1 d-1 after the respective rapeseed, winter wheat, pea, and maize harvests. While CO2 emissions contributed 86-96% to the total GHG budgets, N2O fluxes accounted for 2% after pea, but for 10-12% after rapeseed, winter wheat, and maize. In contrast, CH4 fluxes were negligible (< 2%). N2O fluxes during bare soil periods increased for all cropland sites with increasing water-filled pore space, particularly at high soil temperatures. Thus, our study emphasizes the significance of avoiding bare soil periods to mitigate N2O emissions from croplands.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0.
期刊介绍:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems considers manuscripts dealing with all aspects of carbon and nutrient cycling as well as management and examining their effect in ecological, agronomic, environmental and economic terms. Target agroecosystems include field crop, organic agriculture, urban or peri-urban agriculture, horticulture, bioenergy, agroforestry, livestock, pasture, and fallow systems as well as their system components such as plants and the fertility, chemistry, physics or faunal and micro-biology of soils. The scale of observation is the cycles in the soil-plant-animal system on or relevant to a field or watershed level as well as inputs from or losses to the anthroposphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere. Studies should thus consider the wider system in the examination of cycling and fluxes in agroecosystems or their components. These may include typically multi-year field observations, farm gate budgets, watershed studies, life cycle assessments, enterprise and economic analyses, or regional and global modeling. Management objectives may not only include the maximization of food, fiber and fuel production, but also its environmental and economic impact. The results must allow mechanistic conclusions of broad applicability and distinguish itself from empirical results or case studies of merely local or regional importance. If unsure whether a study fits into this scope, please contact the editor with a brief inquiry before manuscript submission.