精神科门诊病人精神卫生系统反应性问卷中文版的心理测量学评价:经典测试理论与项目反应理论方法。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S503016
Zhenzhu Qian, Yanyan Yang, Jianfeng Tan, You Li, Jin Zhou, Jiewen Huang, Sawitri Assanangkornchai, Jialong Chen
{"title":"精神科门诊病人精神卫生系统反应性问卷中文版的心理测量学评价:经典测试理论与项目反应理论方法。","authors":"Zhenzhu Qian, Yanyan Yang, Jianfeng Tan, You Li, Jin Zhou, Jiewen Huang, Sawitri Assanangkornchai, Jialong Chen","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire has been an important tool for evaluating the quality of health services from non-clinical perspectives. However, there is a lack of reliable and valid tools to assess the responsiveness of the mental health system in China, despite the increasing attention to the quality of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to adapt a Chinese version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire based on the WHO Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire and assess its psychometric properties among psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We adapted the Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire into Chinese and used it on psychiatric outpatients through face-to-face interviews, resulting in 1067 valid responses. We conducted a reliability and validity analysis based on classical test theory (CTT) and applied the graded response model based on item response theory (IRT) to examine the performance of each item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the CTT analysis, values of Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were all greater than 0.8. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited a good fit; convergent and discriminant validity were achieved with average variance extracted > 0.5 and heterotrait-monotrait ratio < 0.9. Results from the IRT analysis showed that all items demonstrated acceptable discrimination (discrimination parameters ≥ 0.65) and appropriate difficulty parameters (ranging from -4 to 4). Additionally, all items provided sufficient information, except for two items in the prompt attention domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our adapted Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire possessed strong psychometric properties and could serve as an effective tool for assessing the responsiveness of mental health systems in China. However, improving two items in the domain of prompt attention may contribute to more optimal psychometric properties of the questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"729-740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire for Psychiatric Outpatients: Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenzhu Qian, Yanyan Yang, Jianfeng Tan, You Li, Jin Zhou, Jiewen Huang, Sawitri Assanangkornchai, Jialong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S503016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire has been an important tool for evaluating the quality of health services from non-clinical perspectives. However, there is a lack of reliable and valid tools to assess the responsiveness of the mental health system in China, despite the increasing attention to the quality of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to adapt a Chinese version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire based on the WHO Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire and assess its psychometric properties among psychiatric outpatients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We adapted the Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire into Chinese and used it on psychiatric outpatients through face-to-face interviews, resulting in 1067 valid responses. We conducted a reliability and validity analysis based on classical test theory (CTT) and applied the graded response model based on item response theory (IRT) to examine the performance of each item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the CTT analysis, values of Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were all greater than 0.8. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited a good fit; convergent and discriminant validity were achieved with average variance extracted > 0.5 and heterotrait-monotrait ratio < 0.9. Results from the IRT analysis showed that all items demonstrated acceptable discrimination (discrimination parameters ≥ 0.65) and appropriate difficulty parameters (ranging from -4 to 4). Additionally, all items provided sufficient information, except for two items in the prompt attention domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our adapted Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire possessed strong psychometric properties and could serve as an effective tool for assessing the responsiveness of mental health systems in China. However, improving two items in the domain of prompt attention may contribute to more optimal psychometric properties of the questionnaire.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"729-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951920/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生系统反应性问卷已成为从非临床角度评估卫生服务质量的重要工具。然而,尽管人们越来越关注精神卫生服务的质量,但缺乏可靠和有效的工具来评估中国精神卫生系统的反应能力。目的:在世界卫生组织《精神卫生系统反应性问卷》的基础上,改编中文版的《精神卫生系统反应性问卷》,评估其在精神科门诊患者中的心理测量特征。患者和方法:我们将《卫生系统反应性问卷》改编成中文,对精神科门诊患者进行面对面访谈,得到1067份有效回复。本研究基于经典测试理论(CTT)进行信效度分析,并采用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的分级反应模型对每个项目的表现进行检验。结果:从CTT分析来看,问卷的Cronbach’s alpha值、重测信度和分半信度均大于0.8。验证性因子分析结果吻合良好;提取的平均方差为0.5,异性状-单性状比< 0.9,达到收敛效度和判别效度。IRT分析结果显示,所有题项的辨别能力(辨别参数≥0.65)和难度参数(-4 ~ 4)均可接受。此外,除提示注意领域的两个题项外,所有题项都提供了足够的信息。结论:心理卫生系统反应性问卷具有较强的心理测量特性,可作为评估中国心理卫生系统反应性的有效工具。然而,改进两项在迅速注意领域可能有助于更优化问卷的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire for Psychiatric Outpatients: Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Approaches.

Background: The Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire has been an important tool for evaluating the quality of health services from non-clinical perspectives. However, there is a lack of reliable and valid tools to assess the responsiveness of the mental health system in China, despite the increasing attention to the quality of mental health services.

Purpose: This study aimed to adapt a Chinese version of the Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire based on the WHO Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire and assess its psychometric properties among psychiatric outpatients.

Patients and methods: We adapted the Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire into Chinese and used it on psychiatric outpatients through face-to-face interviews, resulting in 1067 valid responses. We conducted a reliability and validity analysis based on classical test theory (CTT) and applied the graded response model based on item response theory (IRT) to examine the performance of each item.

Results: From the CTT analysis, values of Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were all greater than 0.8. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited a good fit; convergent and discriminant validity were achieved with average variance extracted > 0.5 and heterotrait-monotrait ratio < 0.9. Results from the IRT analysis showed that all items demonstrated acceptable discrimination (discrimination parameters ≥ 0.65) and appropriate difficulty parameters (ranging from -4 to 4). Additionally, all items provided sufficient information, except for two items in the prompt attention domain.

Conclusion: Our adapted Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire possessed strong psychometric properties and could serve as an effective tool for assessing the responsiveness of mental health systems in China. However, improving two items in the domain of prompt attention may contribute to more optimal psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信