为灾害中的组织间伙伴关系设计弹性网络。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian, Faeze Akbari, Mozhdeh Hashemzadeh, Fatemeh Rezaei
{"title":"为灾害中的组织间伙伴关系设计弹性网络。","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian, Faeze Akbari, Mozhdeh Hashemzadeh, Fatemeh Rezaei","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The shortcomings in multiorganizational collaboration and coordination in disasters necessitate a resilience network to facilitate all parties' involvement which is the aim of this study.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This study began with a comparative review of disaster management networks in ten countries to identify responsible entities and their functions. The advantages of each country for designing a network for public-private partnerships were benchmarked. The initial network was validated through focus group discussions and interviews.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The research revealed that governments typically assume responsibility for disaster management through multiorganizational councils, workgroups, etc., often using the network administrative organization (NAO) approach, with varying autonomy for Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) and private sectors (PSs). The proposed network consists of four inter-organizational coordination groups at the national, state, county, city/town and local levels, each with predefined roles, responsibilities and mutual communication. Voluntary groups called \"CHEED\" and local resiliency councils collaborate with public entities, such as coordinating groups and liaison offices, to organize participants and ensure their competency.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The proposed resilience network provides policymakers with situation-based responses within central, administrative and participatory governance contexts. By integrating NAO, lead organization-governed network (LOGN) and participant-governed networks (PGN) governance forms, the network ensures effective collaboration among public, private and voluntary entities across all disaster phases. This approach can improve the overall resilience and efficiency of disaster management through practical restructuring and by granting legitimacy to participants in future exercises.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The proposed resilience network is unique in its comprehensive, multi-tiered structure that integrates all entities from local to national levels in all disaster phases, enhancing disaster management through effective public-private partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a resilience network for inter-organizational partnerships in disasters.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian, Faeze Akbari, Mozhdeh Hashemzadeh, Fatemeh Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The shortcomings in multiorganizational collaboration and coordination in disasters necessitate a resilience network to facilitate all parties' involvement which is the aim of this study.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This study began with a comparative review of disaster management networks in ten countries to identify responsible entities and their functions. The advantages of each country for designing a network for public-private partnerships were benchmarked. The initial network was validated through focus group discussions and interviews.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The research revealed that governments typically assume responsibility for disaster management through multiorganizational councils, workgroups, etc., often using the network administrative organization (NAO) approach, with varying autonomy for Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) and private sectors (PSs). The proposed network consists of four inter-organizational coordination groups at the national, state, county, city/town and local levels, each with predefined roles, responsibilities and mutual communication. Voluntary groups called \\\"CHEED\\\" and local resiliency councils collaborate with public entities, such as coordinating groups and liaison offices, to organize participants and ensure their competency.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The proposed resilience network provides policymakers with situation-based responses within central, administrative and participatory governance contexts. By integrating NAO, lead organization-governed network (LOGN) and participant-governed networks (PGN) governance forms, the network ensures effective collaboration among public, private and voluntary entities across all disaster phases. This approach can improve the overall resilience and efficiency of disaster management through practical restructuring and by granting legitimacy to participants in future exercises.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The proposed resilience network is unique in its comprehensive, multi-tiered structure that integrates all entities from local to national levels in all disaster phases, enhancing disaster management through effective public-private partnerships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对灾害中多组织协作和协调的不足,需要建立一个弹性网络来促进各方的参与,这是本研究的目的。设计/方法/办法:本研究首先对十个国家的灾害管理网络进行比较审查,以确定负责的实体及其职能。对每个国家在设计公私伙伴关系网络方面的优势进行了基准测试。通过焦点小组讨论和访谈验证了最初的网络。研究发现:政府通常通过多组织理事会、工作组等承担灾害管理责任,通常采用网络行政组织(NAO)方式,非政府组织(ngo)和私营部门(ps)的自主权不同。拟议的网络由国家、州、县、市/镇和地方各级的四个组织间协调小组组成,每个小组都有预先确定的作用、责任和相互沟通。被称为“CHEED”的志愿组织和地方复原委员会与协调小组和联络处等公共实体合作,组织参与者并确保他们的能力。实践意义:所提出的弹性网络为决策者提供了在中央、行政和参与式治理背景下基于情境的响应。通过整合NAO、领导组织治理网络(LOGN)和参与者治理网络(PGN)治理形式,该网络确保在所有灾害阶段公共、私人和自愿实体之间的有效协作。这种方法可以通过实际的重组和赋予未来演习参与者合法性,提高灾害管理的整体复原力和效率。独创性/价值:拟议的复原力网络的独特之处在于其全面、多层次的结构,将所有灾害阶段从地方到国家层面的所有实体整合在一起,通过有效的公私伙伴关系加强灾害管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a resilience network for inter-organizational partnerships in disasters.

Purpose: The shortcomings in multiorganizational collaboration and coordination in disasters necessitate a resilience network to facilitate all parties' involvement which is the aim of this study.

Design/methodology/approach: This study began with a comparative review of disaster management networks in ten countries to identify responsible entities and their functions. The advantages of each country for designing a network for public-private partnerships were benchmarked. The initial network was validated through focus group discussions and interviews.

Findings: The research revealed that governments typically assume responsibility for disaster management through multiorganizational councils, workgroups, etc., often using the network administrative organization (NAO) approach, with varying autonomy for Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) and private sectors (PSs). The proposed network consists of four inter-organizational coordination groups at the national, state, county, city/town and local levels, each with predefined roles, responsibilities and mutual communication. Voluntary groups called "CHEED" and local resiliency councils collaborate with public entities, such as coordinating groups and liaison offices, to organize participants and ensure their competency.

Practical implications: The proposed resilience network provides policymakers with situation-based responses within central, administrative and participatory governance contexts. By integrating NAO, lead organization-governed network (LOGN) and participant-governed networks (PGN) governance forms, the network ensures effective collaboration among public, private and voluntary entities across all disaster phases. This approach can improve the overall resilience and efficiency of disaster management through practical restructuring and by granting legitimacy to participants in future exercises.

Originality/value: The proposed resilience network is unique in its comprehensive, multi-tiered structure that integrates all entities from local to national levels in all disaster phases, enhancing disaster management through effective public-private partnerships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信