散发性前庭神经鞘瘤的前瞻性症状改变:观察、显微外科和放射外科的比较。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karl R Khandalavala, Christine M Lohse, Nicole M Tombers, Michael J Link, Matthew L Carlson
{"title":"散发性前庭神经鞘瘤的前瞻性症状改变:观察、显微外科和放射外科的比较。","authors":"Karl R Khandalavala, Christine M Lohse, Nicole M Tombers, Michael J Link, Matthew L Carlson","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare differences in sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS)-associated patient-reported symptom scores among patients receiving observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective longitudinal survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center and the national Acoustic Neuroma Association.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with sporadic VS.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Baseline and follow-up surveys on patient-reported severity of tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headaches scored on a 10-point numeric scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; changes of 2 or more points from baseline were considered clinically important.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 patients were eligible for study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (2.4) years, including 122 (27%) managed with observation, 226 (50%) undergoing microsurgery, and 107 (23%) undergoing radiosurgery. Changes in tinnitus severity scores differed significantly among management groups (p = 0.006), with severity scores increasing significantly in the radiosurgery (+0.8, p = 0.005) group but not in the observation (+0.2, p = 0.5) or microsurgery (-0.2, p = 0.18) groups. The changes in dizziness/imbalance and headache severity scores did not differ significantly among management groups. When comparing clinically important improvements (decrease of 2 or more points), the microsurgery and observation cohorts had a greater proportion of patients experiencing a clinically important improvement in tinnitus compared with the radiosurgery cohort; no other clinically important changes were significantly different among management groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective study of 455 patients comparing patient-reported symptoms after VS management, radiosurgery was associated with worsening tinnitus severity scores overall and resulted in fewer patients reporting clinically important improvements in tinnitus compared with observation and microsurgery. As there was substantial variability in the effect of management modality on changes in symptom severity scores, possible treatment effects on subjective symptoms, including tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headache, should not be used in isolation to inform clinical decision-making for management of sporadic VS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Symptom Changes in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Comparison of Observation, Microsurgery, and Radiosurgery.\",\"authors\":\"Karl R Khandalavala, Christine M Lohse, Nicole M Tombers, Michael J Link, Matthew L Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare differences in sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS)-associated patient-reported symptom scores among patients receiving observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective longitudinal survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center and the national Acoustic Neuroma Association.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with sporadic VS.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Baseline and follow-up surveys on patient-reported severity of tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headaches scored on a 10-point numeric scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; changes of 2 or more points from baseline were considered clinically important.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 patients were eligible for study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (2.4) years, including 122 (27%) managed with observation, 226 (50%) undergoing microsurgery, and 107 (23%) undergoing radiosurgery. Changes in tinnitus severity scores differed significantly among management groups (p = 0.006), with severity scores increasing significantly in the radiosurgery (+0.8, p = 0.005) group but not in the observation (+0.2, p = 0.5) or microsurgery (-0.2, p = 0.18) groups. The changes in dizziness/imbalance and headache severity scores did not differ significantly among management groups. When comparing clinically important improvements (decrease of 2 or more points), the microsurgery and observation cohorts had a greater proportion of patients experiencing a clinically important improvement in tinnitus compared with the radiosurgery cohort; no other clinically important changes were significantly different among management groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective study of 455 patients comparing patient-reported symptoms after VS management, radiosurgery was associated with worsening tinnitus severity scores overall and resulted in fewer patients reporting clinically important improvements in tinnitus compared with observation and microsurgery. As there was substantial variability in the effect of management modality on changes in symptom severity scores, possible treatment effects on subjective symptoms, including tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headache, should not be used in isolation to inform clinical decision-making for management of sporadic VS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004495\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较散发性前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)相关患者报告的症状评分在接受观察、显微手术和放射手术的患者中的差异。研究设计:前瞻性纵向调查。单位:三级转诊中心和国家听神经瘤协会。患者:成人散发性vs。干预:观察、显微手术或放射手术。主要结果测量:对患者报告的耳鸣、头晕/不平衡和头痛严重程度进行基线和随访调查,评分为10分,分数越高表明症状越严重;与基线相比,2点或更多的变化被认为具有重要的临床意义。结果:共有455例患者符合研究条件,平均(SD)随访时间为4.5(2.4)年,其中观察122例(27%),显微手术226例(50%),放射手术107例(23%)。各治疗组耳鸣严重程度评分的变化差异有统计学意义(p = 0.006),放疗组耳鸣严重程度评分显著升高(+0.8,p = 0.005),而观察组(+0.2,p = 0.5)和显微手术组(-0.2,p = 0.18)耳鸣严重程度评分无统计学意义(p = 0.18)。在管理组中,头晕/不平衡和头痛严重程度评分的变化没有显著差异。当比较临床重要改善(减少2分或更多)时,显微手术和观察队列与放射手术队列相比,耳鸣临床重要改善的患者比例更大;两组间无其他临床重要变化。结论:在这项前瞻性研究中,455名患者比较了VS治疗后患者报告的症状,与观察和显微手术相比,放射线手术与耳鸣严重程度评分总体恶化相关,导致较少的患者报告耳鸣临床上重要的改善。由于治疗方式对症状严重程度评分变化的影响存在很大差异,因此不应单独使用对主观症状(包括耳鸣、头晕/不平衡和头痛)可能产生的治疗效果来指导散发性VS的临床管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Symptom Changes in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Comparison of Observation, Microsurgery, and Radiosurgery.

Objective: To compare differences in sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS)-associated patient-reported symptom scores among patients receiving observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.

Study design: Prospective longitudinal survey.

Setting: Tertiary referral center and the national Acoustic Neuroma Association.

Patients: Adults with sporadic VS.

Intervention: Observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery.

Main outcome measure: Baseline and follow-up surveys on patient-reported severity of tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headaches scored on a 10-point numeric scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; changes of 2 or more points from baseline were considered clinically important.

Results: A total of 455 patients were eligible for study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (2.4) years, including 122 (27%) managed with observation, 226 (50%) undergoing microsurgery, and 107 (23%) undergoing radiosurgery. Changes in tinnitus severity scores differed significantly among management groups (p = 0.006), with severity scores increasing significantly in the radiosurgery (+0.8, p = 0.005) group but not in the observation (+0.2, p = 0.5) or microsurgery (-0.2, p = 0.18) groups. The changes in dizziness/imbalance and headache severity scores did not differ significantly among management groups. When comparing clinically important improvements (decrease of 2 or more points), the microsurgery and observation cohorts had a greater proportion of patients experiencing a clinically important improvement in tinnitus compared with the radiosurgery cohort; no other clinically important changes were significantly different among management groups.

Conclusions: In this prospective study of 455 patients comparing patient-reported symptoms after VS management, radiosurgery was associated with worsening tinnitus severity scores overall and resulted in fewer patients reporting clinically important improvements in tinnitus compared with observation and microsurgery. As there was substantial variability in the effect of management modality on changes in symptom severity scores, possible treatment effects on subjective symptoms, including tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headache, should not be used in isolation to inform clinical decision-making for management of sporadic VS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信