颈动脉介入治疗对颈动脉狭窄患者头痛缓解的影响:颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的回顾性分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S511101
Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin
{"title":"颈动脉介入治疗对颈动脉狭窄患者头痛缓解的影响:颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的回顾性分析。","authors":"Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S511101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1587-1596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Carotid Interventions on Headache Relief in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: a Retrospective Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S511101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1587-1596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S511101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S511101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)对颈动脉狭窄患者术后头痛结局的影响,比较术前头痛强度和新发头痛发生率的变化。材料和方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年12月期间接受CEA (n=167)或CAS (n=117)的284例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。在基线、干预后24小时、1个月和6个月记录术前和术后头痛特征。我们评估了头痛的频率、强度(使用数字评定量表[NRS])和持续时间,同时关注已存在头痛的变化和新头痛的发生率。结果:与CAS组相比,CEA组患者在24小时头痛强度(NRS中位数为4,四分位间距[IQR]: 2-6)有更大的降低(NRS中位数为6,IQR: 2-7;p = 0.038)。1个月时,CEA组头痛评分(中位数2,IQR: 1-3)继续低于CAS组(中位数3,IQR 2-4;p = 0.045)。6个月时,两组头痛缓解程度相似(p=0.785)。在24 h时,CAS患者的新发头痛发生率高于CEA患者(34.1% vs 20.3%;P =0.033)和1个月(26.4% vs 13.1%;P =0.018),但在6个月后收敛。结论:本研究强调了CEA和CAS对头痛结局的不同影响,CEA显示出较低的术后头痛发生率和强度。这些发现强调了在制定治疗计划时考虑患者报告的症状以提高生活质量的必要性。进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的,以证实这些观察结果,并探讨颈动脉干预后头痛结果的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Carotid Interventions on Headache Relief in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: a Retrospective Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Stenting.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.

Results: Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.

Conclusion: This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信