Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin
{"title":"颈动脉介入治疗对颈动脉狭窄患者头痛缓解的影响:颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的回顾性分析。","authors":"Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S511101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1587-1596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Carotid Interventions on Headache Relief in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: a Retrospective Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Oguz Arslanturk, Ali Kemal Gur, Fatih Ada, Emrah Keskin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S511101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1587-1596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S511101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S511101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)对颈动脉狭窄患者术后头痛结局的影响,比较术前头痛强度和新发头痛发生率的变化。材料和方法:我们对2018年1月至2023年12月期间接受CEA (n=167)或CAS (n=117)的284例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。在基线、干预后24小时、1个月和6个月记录术前和术后头痛特征。我们评估了头痛的频率、强度(使用数字评定量表[NRS])和持续时间,同时关注已存在头痛的变化和新头痛的发生率。结果:与CAS组相比,CEA组患者在24小时头痛强度(NRS中位数为4,四分位间距[IQR]: 2-6)有更大的降低(NRS中位数为6,IQR: 2-7;p = 0.038)。1个月时,CEA组头痛评分(中位数2,IQR: 1-3)继续低于CAS组(中位数3,IQR 2-4;p = 0.045)。6个月时,两组头痛缓解程度相似(p=0.785)。在24 h时,CAS患者的新发头痛发生率高于CEA患者(34.1% vs 20.3%;P =0.033)和1个月(26.4% vs 13.1%;P =0.018),但在6个月后收敛。结论:本研究强调了CEA和CAS对头痛结局的不同影响,CEA显示出较低的术后头痛发生率和强度。这些发现强调了在制定治疗计划时考虑患者报告的症状以提高生活质量的必要性。进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的,以证实这些观察结果,并探讨颈动脉干预后头痛结果的潜在机制。
Impact of Carotid Interventions on Headache Relief in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: a Retrospective Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Stenting.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on postoperative headache outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, comparing changes in pre-existing headache intensity and the incidence of new-onset headaches.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 284 patients who underwent CEA (n=167) or CAS (n=117) between January 2018 and December 2023. Pre- and postoperative headache characteristics were documented at baseline and 24 h, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. We evaluated headache frequency, intensity (using the Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), and duration while focusing on changes in pre-existing headaches and the incidence of new headaches.
Results: Patients who underwent CEA had a greater reduction in headache intensity at 24 h (NRS median 4, Interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) compared with those who underwent CAS (NRS median 6, IQR: 2-7; p=0.038). At 1 month, the CEA group continued to show lower headache scores (median 2, IQR: 1-3) compared with the CAS group (median 3, IQR 2-4; p=0.045). At 6 months, both groups had similar levels of headache resolution (p=0.785). Patients who underwent CAS had higher incidences of new-onset headache than those with CEA at 24 h (34.1% vs 20.3%; p=0.033) and 1 month (26.4% vs 13.1%; p=0.018), but converged by 6 months.
Conclusion: This study highlights the differential impacts of CEA and CAS on headache outcomes, with CEA showing a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative headaches. These findings underscore the need to consider patient-reported symptoms in treatment planning to enhance the quality of life. Further prospective research is essential to corroborate these observations and explore the mechanisms underlying headache outcomes after carotid interventions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.