农村成人处方药处置干预未能发现效果的原因分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-03-28 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2024.2446998
Je'Kylynn S Steen, Holli H Seitz, Mary Nelson Robertson, David R Buys
{"title":"农村成人处方药处置干预未能发现效果的原因分析。","authors":"Je'Kylynn S Steen, Holli H Seitz, Mary Nelson Robertson, David R Buys","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2024.2446998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescription opioid misuse has had a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality in the United States, but proper disposal of unused medications can reduce the risk of misuse. This commentary reflects on potential explanations for our failure to detect effects of a mailed communication intervention promoting the use of prescription medication take-back boxes among a rural population of adults. This field experiment included adults (Intervention: <i>N</i> = 3,255; Comparison: <i>N</i> = 3,325) in six counties in Mississippi. Pretest and posttest surveys measured use of take-back boxes, intention to use take-back boxes, and Reasoned Action Approach predictors of intention: attitudes, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and perceived behavioral control. Analyses indicated that the intervention failed to increase participants' intention to use prescription medication take-back boxes. Possible explanations for these null effects include intervention design, low response rates, methodological challenges, and stigma related to the topic area. This commentary provides insights into these explanations and implications for health communication campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":"30 sup1","pages":"68-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explanations for Failure to Detect Effects of a Prescription Medication Disposal Intervention for Rural Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Je'Kylynn S Steen, Holli H Seitz, Mary Nelson Robertson, David R Buys\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10810730.2024.2446998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prescription opioid misuse has had a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality in the United States, but proper disposal of unused medications can reduce the risk of misuse. This commentary reflects on potential explanations for our failure to detect effects of a mailed communication intervention promoting the use of prescription medication take-back boxes among a rural population of adults. This field experiment included adults (Intervention: <i>N</i> = 3,255; Comparison: <i>N</i> = 3,325) in six counties in Mississippi. Pretest and posttest surveys measured use of take-back boxes, intention to use take-back boxes, and Reasoned Action Approach predictors of intention: attitudes, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and perceived behavioral control. Analyses indicated that the intervention failed to increase participants' intention to use prescription medication take-back boxes. Possible explanations for these null effects include intervention design, low response rates, methodological challenges, and stigma related to the topic area. This commentary provides insights into these explanations and implications for health communication campaigns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"volume\":\"30 sup1\",\"pages\":\"68-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2446998\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2446998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

处方阿片类药物滥用对美国的发病率和死亡率产生了重大影响,但妥善处理未使用的药物可以降低滥用的风险。这篇评论反映了我们未能发现邮寄沟通干预在农村成年人中促进处方药回收盒使用的影响的潜在解释。本现场实验包括成人(干预:N = 3255;比较:N = 3325)在密西西比州的六个县。测试前和测试后的调查测量了回收盒的使用、使用回收盒的意图和理性行动方法的意图预测因素:态度、描述性规范、禁令规范和感知行为控制。分析表明,干预未能增加参与者使用处方药回收盒的意愿。对这些无效效应的可能解释包括干预设计、低反应率、方法上的挑战以及与主题领域相关的耻辱感。本评论对这些解释及其对卫生宣传运动的影响提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explanations for Failure to Detect Effects of a Prescription Medication Disposal Intervention for Rural Adults.

Prescription opioid misuse has had a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality in the United States, but proper disposal of unused medications can reduce the risk of misuse. This commentary reflects on potential explanations for our failure to detect effects of a mailed communication intervention promoting the use of prescription medication take-back boxes among a rural population of adults. This field experiment included adults (Intervention: N = 3,255; Comparison: N = 3,325) in six counties in Mississippi. Pretest and posttest surveys measured use of take-back boxes, intention to use take-back boxes, and Reasoned Action Approach predictors of intention: attitudes, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and perceived behavioral control. Analyses indicated that the intervention failed to increase participants' intention to use prescription medication take-back boxes. Possible explanations for these null effects include intervention design, low response rates, methodological challenges, and stigma related to the topic area. This commentary provides insights into these explanations and implications for health communication campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信