联合颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术治疗严重双侧颈动脉狭窄:对颅面和脑血管健康的影响

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Shuo Sun, Ya-Tong Wang, Xiao-Song Shan, He Yang, Yu Zhao, Chun-Hui Li, Xiao-Guang Tong
{"title":"联合颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术治疗严重双侧颈动脉狭窄:对颅面和脑血管健康的影响","authors":"Shuo Sun, Ya-Tong Wang, Xiao-Song Shan, He Yang, Yu Zhao, Chun-Hui Li, Xiao-Guang Tong","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a combined surgical approach involving carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for the management of patients with severe bilateral carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 19 patients diagnosed with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2019 and January 2022. The efficacy of the combined CEA and CAS approach was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative imaging confirmed complete resolution of stenosis, restored lumen patency, and substantial improvement in intracranial hypoperfusion across 38 stenotic sites in the 19 patients. No serious complications were observed during the perioperative period. At the 3-month follow-up, none of the patients experienced cerebrovascular events, and symptoms of preoperative cerebral ischemia revealed varying degrees of improvement. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was ≤2 in all patients, with a mean score of 1.52±0.18. Over a follow-up period extending up to 48 months, no recurrence of stroke or severe complications was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical intervention for patients with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis should be tailored to the clinical profile of each patient. The combined approach of CEA and CAS integrates the advantages of both techniques, reduces the risk of postoperative complications, and enhances the range of therapeutic options available for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Management of Severe Bilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis With Combined Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting: Implications for Craniofacial and Cerebrovascular Health.\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Sun, Ya-Tong Wang, Xiao-Song Shan, He Yang, Yu Zhao, Chun-Hui Li, Xiao-Guang Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a combined surgical approach involving carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for the management of patients with severe bilateral carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 19 patients diagnosed with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2019 and January 2022. The efficacy of the combined CEA and CAS approach was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative imaging confirmed complete resolution of stenosis, restored lumen patency, and substantial improvement in intracranial hypoperfusion across 38 stenotic sites in the 19 patients. No serious complications were observed during the perioperative period. At the 3-month follow-up, none of the patients experienced cerebrovascular events, and symptoms of preoperative cerebral ischemia revealed varying degrees of improvement. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was ≤2 in all patients, with a mean score of 1.52±0.18. Over a follow-up period extending up to 48 months, no recurrence of stroke or severe complications was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical intervention for patients with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis should be tailored to the clinical profile of each patient. The combined approach of CEA and CAS integrates the advantages of both techniques, reduces the risk of postoperative complications, and enhances the range of therapeutic options available for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)联合手术治疗严重双侧颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年1月住院治疗的19例重度双侧颈动脉狭窄患者的临床资料。分析CEA与CAS联合治疗的疗效。结果:术后影像学证实19例患者狭窄完全消退,腔内通畅恢复,38个狭窄部位颅内灌流不足明显改善。围手术期未见严重并发症。随访3个月,所有患者均无脑血管事件发生,术前脑缺血症状均有不同程度改善。所有患者改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分均≤2分,平均1.52±0.18分。在长达48个月的随访期间,没有中风复发或严重并发症的报道。结论:双侧颈动脉严重狭窄患者的手术干预选择应根据患者的临床情况量身定制。CEA和CAS的联合方法整合了两种技术的优势,降低了术后并发症的风险,并增加了该人群的治疗选择范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Management of Severe Bilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis With Combined Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting: Implications for Craniofacial and Cerebrovascular Health.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a combined surgical approach involving carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for the management of patients with severe bilateral carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 19 patients diagnosed with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2019 and January 2022. The efficacy of the combined CEA and CAS approach was analyzed.

Results: Postoperative imaging confirmed complete resolution of stenosis, restored lumen patency, and substantial improvement in intracranial hypoperfusion across 38 stenotic sites in the 19 patients. No serious complications were observed during the perioperative period. At the 3-month follow-up, none of the patients experienced cerebrovascular events, and symptoms of preoperative cerebral ischemia revealed varying degrees of improvement. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was ≤2 in all patients, with a mean score of 1.52±0.18. Over a follow-up period extending up to 48 months, no recurrence of stroke or severe complications was reported.

Conclusion: The choice of surgical intervention for patients with severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis should be tailored to the clinical profile of each patient. The combined approach of CEA and CAS integrates the advantages of both techniques, reduces the risk of postoperative complications, and enhances the range of therapeutic options available for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信