Jacob Abraham, Mark Anderson, Scott Silvestry, Edward G Soltesz, Masahiro Ono, Kanika Mody, Fardad Esmailian, Arman Kilic, Rupinder Bharmi, Rothy Chhim, Roberta Bogaev-Chapman, Gundars J Katlaps, Ismael Salas DE Armas, Mani A Daneshmand, David J Kaczorowski, Duc Thinh Pham, Danny Ramzy, David D'Alessandro
{"title":"手术植入微轴流泵治疗心力衰竭相关性心源性休克的疗效。","authors":"Jacob Abraham, Mark Anderson, Scott Silvestry, Edward G Soltesz, Masahiro Ono, Kanika Mody, Fardad Esmailian, Arman Kilic, Rupinder Bharmi, Rothy Chhim, Roberta Bogaev-Chapman, Gundars J Katlaps, Ismael Salas DE Armas, Mani A Daneshmand, David J Kaczorowski, Duc Thinh Pham, Danny Ramzy, David D'Alessandro","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are increasingly treated with high-profile microaxial flow pumps (Impella 5.5), but little is known about the indications and outcomes of this support strategy in patients with CS due to heart failure (HF-CS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a prospective, multicenter observational study of patients with CS who had been implanted with an Impella 5.5. Adverse events, in-hospital survival rates and 6- and 12-month survival rates were analyzed in the total cohort and between patients treated with Impella 5.5 alone or with multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. Outcomes were stratified based on native heart survival (NHS) and heart-replacement therapy (HRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 804 patients with CS who received Impella 5.5, 444 had HF-CS. Prior to Impella 5.5 placement, 214 (48.1%) had received other tMCS devices. The duration of Impella support was 21.1 ± 20.1 days (median: 15; IQR: 8, 26 days). Survival to discharge was 75.0% for the total cohort, 86.5% for those receiving Impella 5.5 alone, and 65.0% for those receiving multiple tMCS devices. The need for renal-replacement therapy and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusions was more common in those receiving multiple tMCS devices. Among patients with NHS, 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.3% and 64.4%, respectively, while patients receiving HRT had survival rates > 93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5 had overall favorable in-hospital, 6-month and 12-month survival, both as a bridge to NHS as HRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Surgically Implanted Impella Microaxial Flow Pumps in Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Abraham, Mark Anderson, Scott Silvestry, Edward G Soltesz, Masahiro Ono, Kanika Mody, Fardad Esmailian, Arman Kilic, Rupinder Bharmi, Rothy Chhim, Roberta Bogaev-Chapman, Gundars J Katlaps, Ismael Salas DE Armas, Mani A Daneshmand, David J Kaczorowski, Duc Thinh Pham, Danny Ramzy, David D'Alessandro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are increasingly treated with high-profile microaxial flow pumps (Impella 5.5), but little is known about the indications and outcomes of this support strategy in patients with CS due to heart failure (HF-CS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a prospective, multicenter observational study of patients with CS who had been implanted with an Impella 5.5. Adverse events, in-hospital survival rates and 6- and 12-month survival rates were analyzed in the total cohort and between patients treated with Impella 5.5 alone or with multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. Outcomes were stratified based on native heart survival (NHS) and heart-replacement therapy (HRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 804 patients with CS who received Impella 5.5, 444 had HF-CS. Prior to Impella 5.5 placement, 214 (48.1%) had received other tMCS devices. The duration of Impella support was 21.1 ± 20.1 days (median: 15; IQR: 8, 26 days). Survival to discharge was 75.0% for the total cohort, 86.5% for those receiving Impella 5.5 alone, and 65.0% for those receiving multiple tMCS devices. The need for renal-replacement therapy and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusions was more common in those receiving multiple tMCS devices. Among patients with NHS, 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.3% and 64.4%, respectively, while patients receiving HRT had survival rates > 93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5 had overall favorable in-hospital, 6-month and 12-month survival, both as a bridge to NHS as HRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Surgically Implanted Impella Microaxial Flow Pumps in Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.
Background: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are increasingly treated with high-profile microaxial flow pumps (Impella 5.5), but little is known about the indications and outcomes of this support strategy in patients with CS due to heart failure (HF-CS).
Objectives: We sought to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5.
Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective, multicenter observational study of patients with CS who had been implanted with an Impella 5.5. Adverse events, in-hospital survival rates and 6- and 12-month survival rates were analyzed in the total cohort and between patients treated with Impella 5.5 alone or with multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. Outcomes were stratified based on native heart survival (NHS) and heart-replacement therapy (HRT).
Results: Of the 804 patients with CS who received Impella 5.5, 444 had HF-CS. Prior to Impella 5.5 placement, 214 (48.1%) had received other tMCS devices. The duration of Impella support was 21.1 ± 20.1 days (median: 15; IQR: 8, 26 days). Survival to discharge was 75.0% for the total cohort, 86.5% for those receiving Impella 5.5 alone, and 65.0% for those receiving multiple tMCS devices. The need for renal-replacement therapy and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusions was more common in those receiving multiple tMCS devices. Among patients with NHS, 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.3% and 64.4%, respectively, while patients receiving HRT had survival rates > 93%.
Conclusions: Patients with HF-CS treated with Impella 5.5 had overall favorable in-hospital, 6-month and 12-month survival, both as a bridge to NHS as HRT.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.