Dong Wang, Yingjie Li, Xuebin Zhang, Su Yan, Yushi Zhang
{"title":"结合三种技术的成人包皮过长新型包皮环切术:一项回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Dong Wang, Yingjie Li, Xuebin Zhang, Su Yan, Yushi Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We presented a novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis that combines the advantages of three circumcision methods-dorsal slit, guillotine, and sleeve (DGS)-while modifying technical details, referred to as the modified DGS technique. This retrospective comparative trial enrolled 483 adult males with phimosis undergoing circumcision between March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2024 at our hospital. The patients were divided into the modified DGS technique group (n = 151) and control (dorsal slit technique) group (n = 332) according to their preferences. Postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction with penile appearance were compared. The overall complication rate was 2.6% in the modified DGS group and 11.1% in the control group (p = 0.0019). The mean surgical duration was 36.8 ± 11.5 min for the modified DGS group and 35.2 ± 8.9 min for the control group (p = 0.0964). The modified DGS group exhibited a significantly lower dissatisfaction rate regarding overall penile appearance compared to the control group (2.6% versus 18.1%, p < 0.0001) as assessed by the postoperative follow-up questionnaire. The modified DGS technique, compared with the dorsal slit approach, can be used for phimosis with a similar surgical duration. It demonstrates fewer complications and better cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Wang, Yingjie Li, Xuebin Zhang, Su Yan, Yushi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We presented a novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis that combines the advantages of three circumcision methods-dorsal slit, guillotine, and sleeve (DGS)-while modifying technical details, referred to as the modified DGS technique. This retrospective comparative trial enrolled 483 adult males with phimosis undergoing circumcision between March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2024 at our hospital. The patients were divided into the modified DGS technique group (n = 151) and control (dorsal slit technique) group (n = 332) according to their preferences. Postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction with penile appearance were compared. The overall complication rate was 2.6% in the modified DGS group and 11.1% in the control group (p = 0.0019). The mean surgical duration was 36.8 ± 11.5 min for the modified DGS group and 35.2 ± 8.9 min for the control group (p = 0.0964). The modified DGS group exhibited a significantly lower dissatisfaction rate regarding overall penile appearance compared to the control group (2.6% versus 18.1%, p < 0.0001) as assessed by the postoperative follow-up questionnaire. The modified DGS technique, compared with the dorsal slit approach, can be used for phimosis with a similar surgical duration. It demonstrates fewer complications and better cosmetic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.
We presented a novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis that combines the advantages of three circumcision methods-dorsal slit, guillotine, and sleeve (DGS)-while modifying technical details, referred to as the modified DGS technique. This retrospective comparative trial enrolled 483 adult males with phimosis undergoing circumcision between March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2024 at our hospital. The patients were divided into the modified DGS technique group (n = 151) and control (dorsal slit technique) group (n = 332) according to their preferences. Postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction with penile appearance were compared. The overall complication rate was 2.6% in the modified DGS group and 11.1% in the control group (p = 0.0019). The mean surgical duration was 36.8 ± 11.5 min for the modified DGS group and 35.2 ± 8.9 min for the control group (p = 0.0964). The modified DGS group exhibited a significantly lower dissatisfaction rate regarding overall penile appearance compared to the control group (2.6% versus 18.1%, p < 0.0001) as assessed by the postoperative follow-up questionnaire. The modified DGS technique, compared with the dorsal slit approach, can be used for phimosis with a similar surgical duration. It demonstrates fewer complications and better cosmetic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.