撒哈拉以南非洲地区治疗范围内的抗凝质量:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1517162
Desalegn Getnet Demsie, Zenaw Debasu Addisu, Chernet Tafere, Kebede Feyisa, Bereket Bahiru, Malede Berihun Yismaw, Getahun Mihret, Abere Tilahun, Desye Gebrie, Derbew Fikadu Berhe
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲地区治疗范围内的抗凝质量:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Desalegn Getnet Demsie, Zenaw Debasu Addisu, Chernet Tafere, Kebede Feyisa, Bereket Bahiru, Malede Berihun Yismaw, Getahun Mihret, Abere Tilahun, Desye Gebrie, Derbew Fikadu Berhe","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1517162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of anticoagulation with warfarin is often assessed through the time in therapeutic range (TTR). However, achieving optimal TTR and maintaining therapeutic INR levels presents significant challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the quality of warfarin anticoagulation among patients in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Scopus, and citation analysis from Google Scholar. The review's primary focus was therapeutic INR and TTR ≥ 65. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.3. A mixed-effects meta-regression model was used to examine the influence of moderators, with heterogeneity estimated using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> and prediction intervals (PI), and publication bias assessed through funnel plots and Egger's test, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 indicating potential bias. The robustness of pooled proportions was tested using a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The preparation of this review adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 15 observational studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Egger's test confirmed an absence of publication bias across these studies. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency in individual therapeutic INR (pooled estimate: 0.37; range: 0.37-0.40) and TTR (pooled estimate: 0.16; range: 0.15-0.17), closely aligning with pooled proportions. Meta-analysis of high-quality TTR measurements yielded a pooled prevalence of 17% (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 89%), with study-specific values ranging from 10 to 29% and predicted effect sizes between 0.05 and 0.34. The therapeutic INR was observed at a pooled prevalence of 40% (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 86%; prediction interval: 0.16, 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Warfarin therapy is associated with very low percentage of TTR suggests poor quality of anticoagulation management. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1517162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticoagulation quality through time in therapeutic range in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Desalegn Getnet Demsie, Zenaw Debasu Addisu, Chernet Tafere, Kebede Feyisa, Bereket Bahiru, Malede Berihun Yismaw, Getahun Mihret, Abere Tilahun, Desye Gebrie, Derbew Fikadu Berhe\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2025.1517162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of anticoagulation with warfarin is often assessed through the time in therapeutic range (TTR). However, achieving optimal TTR and maintaining therapeutic INR levels presents significant challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the quality of warfarin anticoagulation among patients in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Scopus, and citation analysis from Google Scholar. The review's primary focus was therapeutic INR and TTR ≥ 65. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.3. A mixed-effects meta-regression model was used to examine the influence of moderators, with heterogeneity estimated using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> and prediction intervals (PI), and publication bias assessed through funnel plots and Egger's test, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 indicating potential bias. The robustness of pooled proportions was tested using a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The preparation of this review adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 15 observational studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Egger's test confirmed an absence of publication bias across these studies. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency in individual therapeutic INR (pooled estimate: 0.37; range: 0.37-0.40) and TTR (pooled estimate: 0.16; range: 0.15-0.17), closely aligning with pooled proportions. Meta-analysis of high-quality TTR measurements yielded a pooled prevalence of 17% (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 89%), with study-specific values ranging from 10 to 29% and predicted effect sizes between 0.05 and 0.34. The therapeutic INR was observed at a pooled prevalence of 40% (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 86%; prediction interval: 0.16, 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Warfarin therapy is associated with very low percentage of TTR suggests poor quality of anticoagulation management. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1517162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949880/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1517162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1517162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:华法林抗凝质量通常通过治疗范围内时间(TTR)来评估。然而,实现最佳TTR和维持治疗性INR水平在撒哈拉以南非洲面临重大挑战。本综述旨在总结撒哈拉以南非洲患者华法林抗凝治疗质量的现有证据。方法:通过Ovid检索MEDLINE, PubMed检索Embase,通过Ovid检索Scopus,并通过谷歌Scholar进行引文分析。回顾的主要焦点是治疗INR和TTR ≥ 65。meta分析采用R 4.3.3版本。使用混合效应元回归模型来检验调节因子的影响,使用i2和预测区间(PI)估计异质性,通过漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚,p值为 。结果:我们确定了15项观察性研究纳入本系统评价和荟萃分析。埃格的测试证实了这些研究中没有发表偏倚。敏感性分析显示个体治疗INR的一致性(合并估计:0.37;范围:0.37-0.40)和TTR(汇总估计:0.16;范围:0.15-0.17),与混合比例紧密一致。高质量TTR测量的荟萃分析得出总患病率为17% (I 2 = 89%),研究特异性值范围为10%至29%,预测效应量为0.05至0.34。治疗性INR的总患病率为40% (i2 = 86%;预测区间:0.16,0.67)。结论:华法林治疗与TTR百分比极低相关,表明抗凝管理质量较差。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticoagulation quality through time in therapeutic range in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The quality of anticoagulation with warfarin is often assessed through the time in therapeutic range (TTR). However, achieving optimal TTR and maintaining therapeutic INR levels presents significant challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the quality of warfarin anticoagulation among patients in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Method: We searched MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Scopus, and citation analysis from Google Scholar. The review's primary focus was therapeutic INR and TTR ≥ 65. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.3. A mixed-effects meta-regression model was used to examine the influence of moderators, with heterogeneity estimated using I 2 and prediction intervals (PI), and publication bias assessed through funnel plots and Egger's test, with p < 0.05 indicating potential bias. The robustness of pooled proportions was tested using a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The preparation of this review adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA.

Results: We identified 15 observational studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Egger's test confirmed an absence of publication bias across these studies. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency in individual therapeutic INR (pooled estimate: 0.37; range: 0.37-0.40) and TTR (pooled estimate: 0.16; range: 0.15-0.17), closely aligning with pooled proportions. Meta-analysis of high-quality TTR measurements yielded a pooled prevalence of 17% (I 2 = 89%), with study-specific values ranging from 10 to 29% and predicted effect sizes between 0.05 and 0.34. The therapeutic INR was observed at a pooled prevalence of 40% (I 2 = 86%; prediction interval: 0.16, 0.67).

Conclusion: Warfarin therapy is associated with very low percentage of TTR suggests poor quality of anticoagulation management. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信