日本和非日本国家左主干疾病治疗策略和临床结果的差异

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takayuki Warisawa, Christopher M Cook, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Henry Seligman, Christopher Rajkumar, Shunichi Doi, Sonoka Yuasa, Akihiro Nakajima, Takumi Toya, Masafumi Nakayama, Yuetsu Kikuta, Yoshiaki Kawase, Hidetaka Nishina, Rasha Al-Lamee, Amir Lerman, Hitoshi Matsuo, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Javier Escaned, Justin E Davies
{"title":"日本和非日本国家左主干疾病治疗策略和临床结果的差异","authors":"Takayuki Warisawa, Christopher M Cook, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Henry Seligman, Christopher Rajkumar, Shunichi Doi, Sonoka Yuasa, Akihiro Nakajima, Takumi Toya, Masafumi Nakayama, Yuetsu Kikuta, Yoshiaki Kawase, Hidetaka Nishina, Rasha Al-Lamee, Amir Lerman, Hitoshi Matsuo, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Javier Escaned, Justin E Davies","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":"66 2","pages":"202-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Takayuki Warisawa, Christopher M Cook, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Henry Seligman, Christopher Rajkumar, Shunichi Doi, Sonoka Yuasa, Akihiro Nakajima, Takumi Toya, Masafumi Nakayama, Yuetsu Kikuta, Yoshiaki Kawase, Hidetaka Nishina, Rasha Al-Lamee, Amir Lerman, Hitoshi Matsuo, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Javier Escaned, Justin E Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/ihj.24-375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International heart journal\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"202-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管最先进的左主干疾病(LMD)治疗已被证明可以改善整体心血管预后,但目前尚不清楚在当代治疗中是否可以观察到日本和非日本患者的策略和结果差异。在这项国际多中心注册研究中,我们分析了314名接受了最先进的LMD治疗的患者,包括生理引导的血运重建术、冠状动脉成像辅助下使用最新药物洗脱支架的冠状动脉介入治疗,或采用胸廓内动脉移植的外科手术,以及指南指导的药物治疗。患者队列分为日本组(n = 122)和非日本组(n = 192)。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建。使用倾向评分匹配来解释基线临床变量。基线和病变特征在各组之间存在差异,在日本队列中,糖尿病和慢性肾脏疾病的发生率更高,SYNTAX评分更高,狭窄程度更严重,导致了更高的血运重建率(P < 0.05)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为血运重建术的选择更为频繁(P < 0.001)。调整前两组间MACE无显著差异,调整后,日本队列显示4年时MACE显著降低(6.3% vs 16.7%;人力资源:0.37;95%置信区间:0.14—-0.97;P = 0.042)。多变量分析进一步证实了日本患者与降低4年MACE风险之间的独立关联(HR: 0.37;95%置信区间:0.14—-0.96;P = 0.040)。在一项采用最先进的LMD治疗方法的当代研究中,在日本接受治疗的患者表现出更好的心血管预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries.

Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信