多胎妊娠预防早产:宫颈托疗效的回顾性研究。

Q4 Medicine
Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2025-01-01
L Melia, R Sulukhia, N Jojua, T Gognadze, N Davidova
{"title":"多胎妊娠预防早产:宫颈托疗效的回顾性研究。","authors":"L Melia, R Sulukhia, N Jojua, T Gognadze, N Davidova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>the assessment of the efficacy of pessary in Preterm Birth (PB) prevention in patients with multifetal pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Perinatal Department of Gudushauri National Medical Center from 2020 to 2024 and included 226 women only with multifetal pregnancies and threatened PB. The patients were divided into three groups: group I - 68 patients who conceived naturally and a pessary was used to prevent the preterm delivery; group II - 84 pregnant women after assistive reproductive technologies (ART) and the treatment of premature birth was also provided using a pessary; and group III - 74 women with threatened preterm delivery in whom a pessary was not used for the prevention. In all cases the pessaries were inserted between 14-24 weeks of gestation. The difference was statistically significant if P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, the frequency of late preterm delivery - n=35 (51.47%) was statistically significantly higher compared to moderate - n=24 (35.29%), very preterm - n=7 (10.29%) and extremely preterm - n=2 (2.94%) delivery rates (P<0.001). The same tendency was revealed as in patients after IVF and pessary insertion, so in patients without pessary (P<0.001). However, a statistically significant difference was not found when comparing rates between groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of pessary in multifetal pregnancies must be regarded as supportive therapy as it may prolong the pregnancy, however, it does not prevent the preterm delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 358","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION IN MULTIFETAL PREGNANCIES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON CERVICAL PESSARY EFFICACY.\",\"authors\":\"L Melia, R Sulukhia, N Jojua, T Gognadze, N Davidova\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>the assessment of the efficacy of pessary in Preterm Birth (PB) prevention in patients with multifetal pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Perinatal Department of Gudushauri National Medical Center from 2020 to 2024 and included 226 women only with multifetal pregnancies and threatened PB. The patients were divided into three groups: group I - 68 patients who conceived naturally and a pessary was used to prevent the preterm delivery; group II - 84 pregnant women after assistive reproductive technologies (ART) and the treatment of premature birth was also provided using a pessary; and group III - 74 women with threatened preterm delivery in whom a pessary was not used for the prevention. In all cases the pessaries were inserted between 14-24 weeks of gestation. The difference was statistically significant if P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I, the frequency of late preterm delivery - n=35 (51.47%) was statistically significantly higher compared to moderate - n=24 (35.29%), very preterm - n=7 (10.29%) and extremely preterm - n=2 (2.94%) delivery rates (P<0.001). The same tendency was revealed as in patients after IVF and pessary insertion, so in patients without pessary (P<0.001). However, a statistically significant difference was not found when comparing rates between groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of pessary in multifetal pregnancies must be regarded as supportive therapy as it may prolong the pregnancy, however, it does not prevent the preterm delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgian medical news\",\"volume\":\" 358\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgian medical news\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价子宫托预防多胎妊娠患者早产(PB)的疗效。材料与方法:回顾性队列研究于2020 - 2024年在古都豪里国立医学中心围产期进行,纳入226例多胎妊娠及先兆PB妇女。患者分为三组:第一组68例自然受孕,使用子宫托预防早产;II组- 84名接受辅助生殖技术(ART)和早产儿治疗的孕妇也使用子宫托;第三组——74名未使用子宫托预防的先兆早产妇女。所有病例均在妊娠14-24周插入子宫托。结果:I组晚期早产发生率n=35例(51.47%)明显高于中度早产发生率n=24例(35.29%)、重度早产发生率n=7例(10.29%)和重度早产发生率n=2例(2.94%)(p < 0.05)。结论:多胎妊娠时使用子宫托可延长妊娠期,但不能预防早产,应作为支持治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION IN MULTIFETAL PREGNANCIES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON CERVICAL PESSARY EFFICACY.

Aim of the study: the assessment of the efficacy of pessary in Preterm Birth (PB) prevention in patients with multifetal pregnancies.

Material and methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Perinatal Department of Gudushauri National Medical Center from 2020 to 2024 and included 226 women only with multifetal pregnancies and threatened PB. The patients were divided into three groups: group I - 68 patients who conceived naturally and a pessary was used to prevent the preterm delivery; group II - 84 pregnant women after assistive reproductive technologies (ART) and the treatment of premature birth was also provided using a pessary; and group III - 74 women with threatened preterm delivery in whom a pessary was not used for the prevention. In all cases the pessaries were inserted between 14-24 weeks of gestation. The difference was statistically significant if P<0.05.

Results: In group I, the frequency of late preterm delivery - n=35 (51.47%) was statistically significantly higher compared to moderate - n=24 (35.29%), very preterm - n=7 (10.29%) and extremely preterm - n=2 (2.94%) delivery rates (P<0.001). The same tendency was revealed as in patients after IVF and pessary insertion, so in patients without pessary (P<0.001). However, a statistically significant difference was not found when comparing rates between groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The use of pessary in multifetal pregnancies must be regarded as supportive therapy as it may prolong the pregnancy, however, it does not prevent the preterm delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信