情绪量表概况的跨文化验证:短筛选版本心理测量特性的评估。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717
Ileana Schmalbach, Bjarne Schmalbach, Alireza Aghababa, Ralf Brand, Yu-Kai Chang, Muhammet Cihat Çiftçi, Hassan Elsangedy, Jesús Fernández Gavira, Zhijian Huang, Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir, Luca Mallia, Sanaz Nosrat, Caterina Pesce, Daði Rafnsson, Daniel Medina Rebollo, Sinika Timme, Elmar Brähler, Katja Petrowski
{"title":"情绪量表概况的跨文化验证:短筛选版本心理测量特性的评估。","authors":"Ileana Schmalbach, Bjarne Schmalbach, Alireza Aghababa, Ralf Brand, Yu-Kai Chang, Muhammet Cihat Çiftçi, Hassan Elsangedy, Jesús Fernández Gavira, Zhijian Huang, Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir, Luca Mallia, Sanaz Nosrat, Caterina Pesce, Daði Rafnsson, Daniel Medina Rebollo, Sinika Timme, Elmar Brähler, Katja Petrowski","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is one of the most widely applied scales for measuring mood. Considering the advantages of short scales and increased international research, the aim of the present study was to evaluate cross-culturally the psychometric properties of a short 16-item version of the POMS. Data were collected from 15,693 participants across 10 different countries worldwide. Initially, we identified the original versions of the POMS in various languages. Subsequently, we selected 16 items based on the previously validated short form (POMS-16) for analysis. Psychometric properties of the POMS were then evaluated in samples from each studied population for each language version. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess its invariance across age groups and gender, alongside reliability estimation. Most language versions of the POMS-16 showed a good fit with the four-factor model, except for the Chinese (traditional) and Turkish versions. Reliability was generally high, except for the <i>Vigor</i> subscale in a small subset of languages. Regarding measurement invariance, the majority of language versions were invariant across gender and age groups, except for the Farsi language version across gender, and the Chinese, Farsi, Finnish, and Turkish versions across age. These findings enhance the cross-cultural applicability of the POMS-16, contributing to its utility in diverse populations and thus enhancing the comparability of the results. In addition, we introduced the first versions of the POMS in Farsi, Finnish, and Icelandic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1498717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural validation of the profile of mood scale: evaluation of the psychometric properties of short screening versions.\",\"authors\":\"Ileana Schmalbach, Bjarne Schmalbach, Alireza Aghababa, Ralf Brand, Yu-Kai Chang, Muhammet Cihat Çiftçi, Hassan Elsangedy, Jesús Fernández Gavira, Zhijian Huang, Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir, Luca Mallia, Sanaz Nosrat, Caterina Pesce, Daði Rafnsson, Daniel Medina Rebollo, Sinika Timme, Elmar Brähler, Katja Petrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is one of the most widely applied scales for measuring mood. Considering the advantages of short scales and increased international research, the aim of the present study was to evaluate cross-culturally the psychometric properties of a short 16-item version of the POMS. Data were collected from 15,693 participants across 10 different countries worldwide. Initially, we identified the original versions of the POMS in various languages. Subsequently, we selected 16 items based on the previously validated short form (POMS-16) for analysis. Psychometric properties of the POMS were then evaluated in samples from each studied population for each language version. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess its invariance across age groups and gender, alongside reliability estimation. Most language versions of the POMS-16 showed a good fit with the four-factor model, except for the Chinese (traditional) and Turkish versions. Reliability was generally high, except for the <i>Vigor</i> subscale in a small subset of languages. Regarding measurement invariance, the majority of language versions were invariant across gender and age groups, except for the Farsi language version across gender, and the Chinese, Farsi, Finnish, and Turkish versions across age. These findings enhance the cross-cultural applicability of the POMS-16, contributing to its utility in diverse populations and thus enhancing the comparability of the results. In addition, we introduced the first versions of the POMS in Farsi, Finnish, and Icelandic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1498717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情绪状态量表(POMS)是目前应用最广泛的情绪测量量表之一。考虑到短量表的优势和国际研究的增加,本研究的目的是评估跨文化的16项短版POMS的心理测量特性。数据收集自全球10个不同国家的15693名参与者。最初,我们确定了各种语言的POMS的原始版本。随后,我们根据之前验证的短格式(POMS-16)选择了16个项目进行分析。然后在每个研究人群的每个语言版本的样本中评估POMS的心理测量特性。进行验证性因子分析以评估其在不同年龄组和性别之间的不变性,以及可靠性估计。除了中文(传统)和土耳其语版本外,大多数语言版本的POMS-16显示出与四因素模型的良好契合。除了一小部分语言的Vigor子量表外,信度总体较高。在测量不变性方面,除了波斯语版本跨性别,以及汉语、波斯语、芬兰语和土耳其语版本跨年龄之外,大多数语言版本在性别和年龄组之间都是不变的。这些发现增强了POMS-16的跨文化适用性,有助于其在不同人群中的效用,从而增强了结果的可比性。此外,我们还介绍了波斯语、芬兰语和冰岛语的第一个POMS版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural validation of the profile of mood scale: evaluation of the psychometric properties of short screening versions.

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is one of the most widely applied scales for measuring mood. Considering the advantages of short scales and increased international research, the aim of the present study was to evaluate cross-culturally the psychometric properties of a short 16-item version of the POMS. Data were collected from 15,693 participants across 10 different countries worldwide. Initially, we identified the original versions of the POMS in various languages. Subsequently, we selected 16 items based on the previously validated short form (POMS-16) for analysis. Psychometric properties of the POMS were then evaluated in samples from each studied population for each language version. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess its invariance across age groups and gender, alongside reliability estimation. Most language versions of the POMS-16 showed a good fit with the four-factor model, except for the Chinese (traditional) and Turkish versions. Reliability was generally high, except for the Vigor subscale in a small subset of languages. Regarding measurement invariance, the majority of language versions were invariant across gender and age groups, except for the Farsi language version across gender, and the Chinese, Farsi, Finnish, and Turkish versions across age. These findings enhance the cross-cultural applicability of the POMS-16, contributing to its utility in diverse populations and thus enhancing the comparability of the results. In addition, we introduced the first versions of the POMS in Farsi, Finnish, and Icelandic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信