Tao Yan, Hui-Xian Li, Yu-Lin Sun, Yi Liu, Rong Chen, Rong-Hui Peng, Zhao-Xu Zheng, Shi-Ning Qu, Fei Wang, Wei Tang, Lin Zhang, Shi-Jing Wei, Bao-Na Wang, Li Sun, Hui Zheng
{"title":"预防腹腔镜结直肠手术后肺部并发症:肺保护方案与标准治疗:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Tao Yan, Hui-Xian Li, Yu-Lin Sun, Yi Liu, Rong Chen, Rong-Hui Peng, Zhao-Xu Zheng, Shi-Ning Qu, Fei Wang, Wei Tang, Lin Zhang, Shi-Jing Wei, Bao-Na Wang, Li Sun, Hui Zheng","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placing patients in the steep Trendelenburg position with a pressurised pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery increases pulmonary airway pressure, increasing the risks of lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications, even in patients with healthy lungs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to determine whether an integrated anaesthesia protocol was superior to traditional protective ventilation in terms of preventing pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a randomised, controlled, parallel-group design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This single-centre trial was conducted at the National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with intermediate to high risk of pulmonary complications, as determined by the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to either lung protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + deep neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 0 and post tetanic of 1 to 2) + low peritoneal pressure (10 mmHg) or conventional pulmonary ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + moderate neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 1 to 2) + standard peritoneal pressure (15 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes included serological biomarkers of lung injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lung protective group had a significantly lower incidence of pulmonary complications (15.0%) than the conventional group (38.3%; hazard ratio, 0.332; 95% CI, 0.153 to 0.718; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the plasma biomarker levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and angiopoietin-2 for lung injury between the groups. The treatment-by-covariate interactive analysis revealed that the lung-protective strategy conferred considerable benefits for males and individuals aged 60 years or above. A nomogram that predicted pulmonary complications incorporating four variables exhibited a strong discriminative performance, and the results of the decision curve analysis revealed the potential clinical value of this nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with traditional strategies, the integrated lung-protective approach may mitigate pulmonary complications without causing lung injury in intermediate to high-respiratory-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2100054215.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing pulmonary complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a lung-protective protocol vs. standard care: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Yan, Hui-Xian Li, Yu-Lin Sun, Yi Liu, Rong Chen, Rong-Hui Peng, Zhao-Xu Zheng, Shi-Ning Qu, Fei Wang, Wei Tang, Lin Zhang, Shi-Jing Wei, Bao-Na Wang, Li Sun, Hui Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placing patients in the steep Trendelenburg position with a pressurised pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery increases pulmonary airway pressure, increasing the risks of lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications, even in patients with healthy lungs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to determine whether an integrated anaesthesia protocol was superior to traditional protective ventilation in terms of preventing pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a randomised, controlled, parallel-group design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This single-centre trial was conducted at the National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with intermediate to high risk of pulmonary complications, as determined by the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to either lung protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + deep neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 0 and post tetanic of 1 to 2) + low peritoneal pressure (10 mmHg) or conventional pulmonary ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + moderate neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 1 to 2) + standard peritoneal pressure (15 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes included serological biomarkers of lung injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lung protective group had a significantly lower incidence of pulmonary complications (15.0%) than the conventional group (38.3%; hazard ratio, 0.332; 95% CI, 0.153 to 0.718; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the plasma biomarker levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and angiopoietin-2 for lung injury between the groups. The treatment-by-covariate interactive analysis revealed that the lung-protective strategy conferred considerable benefits for males and individuals aged 60 years or above. A nomogram that predicted pulmonary complications incorporating four variables exhibited a strong discriminative performance, and the results of the decision curve analysis revealed the potential clinical value of this nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with traditional strategies, the integrated lung-protective approach may mitigate pulmonary complications without causing lung injury in intermediate to high-respiratory-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2100054215.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在腹腔镜结肠直肠癌手术中,将患者置于陡峭的Trendelenburg体位并加压气腹会增加肺部气道压力,增加肺损伤和术后肺部并发症的风险,即使在肺健康的患者中也是如此。目的:目的是确定在预防肺部并发症方面,综合麻醉方案是否优于传统的保护性通气。设计:本研究采用随机、对照、平行组设计。背景:本单中心试验于2023年1 - 5月在中国医学科学院国家肿瘤中心/肿瘤医院进行。患者:根据加泰罗尼亚手术患者呼吸风险评估(ARISCAT)评分,共有120例接受腹腔镜手术治疗的中至高危肺并发症的结直肠癌患者。干预措施:参与者被随机分配到肺保护性通气组,潮气量为预测体重的6 ml kg-1 +深度神经肌肉阻滞(四组计数为0,破伤风后为1至2)+低腹膜压(10 mmHg),或常规肺通气,潮气量为预测体重的8 ml kg-1 +中度神经肌肉阻滞(四组计数为1至2)+标准腹膜压(15 mmHg)。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为术后30天内肺部并发症的发生率。次要结局包括肺损伤的血清学生物标志物。结果:肺保护组肺部并发症发生率(15.0%)明显低于常规组(38.3%);风险比0.332;95% CI, 0.153 ~ 0.718;p = 0.003)。两组间晚期糖基化终产物可溶性受体和肺损伤血管生成素-2血浆生物标志物水平无显著差异。协变量治疗交互分析显示,肺保护策略对男性和60岁或以上的个体具有相当大的益处。包含四个变量的预测肺部并发症的nomogram具有很强的判别性,决策曲线分析的结果揭示了该nomogram的潜在临床价值。结论:与传统策略相比,综合肺保护入路可减轻腹腔镜结直肠手术中高呼吸风险患者的肺部并发症,且不造成肺损伤。试验注册:中文临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2100054215。
Preventing pulmonary complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a lung-protective protocol vs. standard care: A randomised controlled trial.
Background: Placing patients in the steep Trendelenburg position with a pressurised pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery increases pulmonary airway pressure, increasing the risks of lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications, even in patients with healthy lungs.
Objectives: The aim was to determine whether an integrated anaesthesia protocol was superior to traditional protective ventilation in terms of preventing pulmonary complications.
Design: This study used a randomised, controlled, parallel-group design.
Setting: This single-centre trial was conducted at the National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January to May 2023.
Patients: A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with intermediate to high risk of pulmonary complications, as determined by the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score.
Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to either lung protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + deep neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 0 and post tetanic of 1 to 2) + low peritoneal pressure (10 mmHg) or conventional pulmonary ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + moderate neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 1 to 2) + standard peritoneal pressure (15 mmHg).
Main outcome measurements: The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes included serological biomarkers of lung injury.
Results: The lung protective group had a significantly lower incidence of pulmonary complications (15.0%) than the conventional group (38.3%; hazard ratio, 0.332; 95% CI, 0.153 to 0.718; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the plasma biomarker levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and angiopoietin-2 for lung injury between the groups. The treatment-by-covariate interactive analysis revealed that the lung-protective strategy conferred considerable benefits for males and individuals aged 60 years or above. A nomogram that predicted pulmonary complications incorporating four variables exhibited a strong discriminative performance, and the results of the decision curve analysis revealed the potential clinical value of this nomogram.
Conclusion: Compared with traditional strategies, the integrated lung-protective approach may mitigate pulmonary complications without causing lung injury in intermediate to high-respiratory-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2100054215.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).