潮汐容积-膈肌收缩速度诊断准确性的研究:一种预测断奶结局的新指标。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660
Apostolos A Menis, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Maria E Papadonta, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Demosthenes Makris
{"title":"潮汐容积-膈肌收缩速度诊断准确性的研究:一种预测断奶结局的新指标。","authors":"Apostolos A Menis, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Maria E Papadonta, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Demosthenes Makris","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Weaning failure from mechanical ventilation (MV) is primarily caused by increased respiratory load and decreased respiratory neuromuscular competency, leading to a rapid shallow breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the product of diaphragmatic contraction velocity (a sonographic estimate of respiratory load) and tidal volume (an estimate of breathing pattern), termed the volume-velocity index (VVI), may predict weaning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of VVI (mL*cm/s) in predicting weaning outcomes was prospectively assessed, along with its relationship to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). A power analysis, informed by the results of an inception cohort, determined the required sample size for the validation cohort. Patients were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Weaning failure was defined as failure of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or the need for MV within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>VVI was evaluated in critical care patients undergoing a SBT for the first time.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the inception cohort ( n = 30), VVI was significantly higher in successful weaning compared to failures (764.76 [±432.61] vs. 278 [±183.66], p < 0.001). It correlated with ΔPes ( r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55), PTPes ( r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58), and MIP ( r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55) all p values less than 0.001. In the validation cohort ( n = 40), VVI was higher in successful weaning (840 [550, 1220] vs. 250 [225, 302.5], p < 0.001) and predicted weaning success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VVI effectively differentiates between weaning success and failure, shows a strong correlation with respiratory effort indices, and may enhance weaning protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1214-e1223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Tidal Volume-Diaphragmatic Contraction Velocity: A Novel Index for Weaning Outcome Prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Apostolos A Menis, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Maria E Papadonta, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Demosthenes Makris\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Weaning failure from mechanical ventilation (MV) is primarily caused by increased respiratory load and decreased respiratory neuromuscular competency, leading to a rapid shallow breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the product of diaphragmatic contraction velocity (a sonographic estimate of respiratory load) and tidal volume (an estimate of breathing pattern), termed the volume-velocity index (VVI), may predict weaning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of VVI (mL*cm/s) in predicting weaning outcomes was prospectively assessed, along with its relationship to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). A power analysis, informed by the results of an inception cohort, determined the required sample size for the validation cohort. Patients were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Weaning failure was defined as failure of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or the need for MV within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>VVI was evaluated in critical care patients undergoing a SBT for the first time.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the inception cohort ( n = 30), VVI was significantly higher in successful weaning compared to failures (764.76 [±432.61] vs. 278 [±183.66], p < 0.001). It correlated with ΔPes ( r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55), PTPes ( r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58), and MIP ( r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55) all p values less than 0.001. In the validation cohort ( n = 40), VVI was higher in successful weaning (840 [550, 1220] vs. 250 [225, 302.5], p < 0.001) and predicted weaning success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VVI effectively differentiates between weaning success and failure, shows a strong correlation with respiratory effort indices, and may enhance weaning protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1214-e1223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机械通气(MV)脱机失败主要是由于呼吸负荷增加和呼吸神经肌肉能力下降,导致快速浅呼吸模式。我们假设膈肌收缩速度(一种呼吸负荷的超声估计)和潮气量(一种呼吸模式的估计)的乘积,称为容积-速度指数(VVI),可以预测脱机结果。设计:前瞻性评估VVI (mL*cm/s)预测脱机结果的诊断准确性,以及其与呼吸努力指标的关系,包括食管压力波动(ΔPes)、食管压力-时间积(PTPes)和最大吸气压力(MIP)。根据初始队列的结果进行功效分析,确定验证队列所需的样本量。患者通过连续抽样入组。脱机失败定义为自主呼吸试验(SBT)失败或48小时内需要MV。环境:本研究在三级学术ICU进行。患者:首次在接受SBT的重症监护患者中评估VVI。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在初始队列(n = 30)中,成功断奶的VVI明显高于失败断奶的VVI(764.76[±432.61]比278[±183.66],p < 0.001)。与ΔPes (r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55)、PTPes (r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58)、MIP (r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55)相关,p值均小于0.001。在验证队列(n = 40)中,VVI在成功断奶时更高(840[550,1220]对250 [225,302.5],p < 0.001),并且预测断奶成功的接受者工作特征下面积为0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1)。结论:VVI可有效区分断奶成功和失败,与呼吸努力指数有很强的相关性,并可改进断奶方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Tidal Volume-Diaphragmatic Contraction Velocity: A Novel Index for Weaning Outcome Prediction.

Objectives: Weaning failure from mechanical ventilation (MV) is primarily caused by increased respiratory load and decreased respiratory neuromuscular competency, leading to a rapid shallow breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the product of diaphragmatic contraction velocity (a sonographic estimate of respiratory load) and tidal volume (an estimate of breathing pattern), termed the volume-velocity index (VVI), may predict weaning outcomes.

Design: The diagnostic accuracy of VVI (mL*cm/s) in predicting weaning outcomes was prospectively assessed, along with its relationship to indices of breathing effort, including esophageal pressure swings (ΔPes), the pressure-time product of esophageal pressure (PTPes), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). A power analysis, informed by the results of an inception cohort, determined the required sample size for the validation cohort. Patients were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Weaning failure was defined as failure of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or the need for MV within 48 hours.

Setting: The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.

Patients: VVI was evaluated in critical care patients undergoing a SBT for the first time.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In the inception cohort ( n = 30), VVI was significantly higher in successful weaning compared to failures (764.76 [±432.61] vs. 278 [±183.66], p < 0.001). It correlated with ΔPes ( r = 0.74, R2 = 0.55), PTPes ( r = 0.76, R2 = 0.58), and MIP ( r = 0.75, R2 = 0.55) all p values less than 0.001. In the validation cohort ( n = 40), VVI was higher in successful weaning (840 [550, 1220] vs. 250 [225, 302.5], p < 0.001) and predicted weaning success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1).

Conclusions: VVI effectively differentiates between weaning success and failure, shows a strong correlation with respiratory effort indices, and may enhance weaning protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信