无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心脏生物标志物:来自早期TAVR试验的分析

IF 35.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Brian R Lindman, Philippe Pibarot, Allan Schwartz, J Bradley Oldemeyer, Yan Ru Su, Kashish Goel, David J Cohen, William F Fearon, Vasilis Babaliaros, David Daniels, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Hussam S Suradi, Pinak Shah, Molly Szerlip, Michael J Mack, Thom Dahle, William W O'Neill, Charles J Davidson, Raj Makkar, Tej Sheth, Jeremiah Depta, James T DeVries, Jeffrey Southard, Andrei Pop, Paul Sorajja, Rebecca T Hahn, Yanglu Zhao, Martin B Leon, Philippe Généreux
{"title":"无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心脏生物标志物:来自早期TAVR试验的分析","authors":"Brian R Lindman, Philippe Pibarot, Allan Schwartz, J Bradley Oldemeyer, Yan Ru Su, Kashish Goel, David J Cohen, William F Fearon, Vasilis Babaliaros, David Daniels, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Hussam S Suradi, Pinak Shah, Molly Szerlip, Michael J Mack, Thom Dahle, William W O'Neill, Charles J Davidson, Raj Makkar, Tej Sheth, Jeremiah Depta, James T DeVries, Jeffrey Southard, Andrei Pop, Paul Sorajja, Rebecca T Hahn, Yanglu Zhao, Martin B Leon, Philippe Généreux","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EARLY TAVR trial demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) intervention was superior to clinical surveillance (CS) with delayed TAVR in patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS). Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maladaptive remodeling, symptom onset, and worse outcomes after TAVR. Whether elevated biomarkers identify asymptomatic patients more likely to benefit from early intervention is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A core laboratory measured N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Associations between biomarker levels and risk of the trial primary endpoint (death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization) and other secondary endpoints were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Interaction tests were performed to assess whether the treatment effect of early TAVR, compared with CS, differed according to biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 901 patients randomized in EARLY TAVR, 798 (89%) had biospecimens measured (median NT-proBNP 287 [145, 601]; median hs-cTnT 14.6 [10.5, 21.0]). Higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were broadly associated with higher event rates for multiple endpoints. In general, there was no significant interaction between baseline biomarkers and treatment group with respect to any composite or individual endpoint examined, although trends broadly demonstrated a greater relative benefit of early TAVR at lower biomarker levels. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT and treatment group with respect to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) (interaction p=0.04) and HFH alone (interaction p=0.03) such that the relative benefit of early TAVR was greater for patients with normal, rather than elevated, levels of hs-cTnT at baseline. For some endpoints, higher baseline NT-proBNP was associated with numerically greater absolute risk reduction with early TAVR than lower NT-proBNP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with asymptomatic severe high gradient AS, higher NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were broadly associated with higher event rates as expected. However, the relative benefit of an early TAVR strategy was consistent regardless of baseline biomarker levels and, contrary to our hypothesis, tended to be more pronounced in those with the lowest biomarker levels. These findings suggest limited value for single measurements of these biomarkers to guide the timing of TAVR in asymptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients with Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Analysis from the EARLY TAVR Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Brian R Lindman, Philippe Pibarot, Allan Schwartz, J Bradley Oldemeyer, Yan Ru Su, Kashish Goel, David J Cohen, William F Fearon, Vasilis Babaliaros, David Daniels, Adnan Chhatriwalla, Hussam S Suradi, Pinak Shah, Molly Szerlip, Michael J Mack, Thom Dahle, William W O'Neill, Charles J Davidson, Raj Makkar, Tej Sheth, Jeremiah Depta, James T DeVries, Jeffrey Southard, Andrei Pop, Paul Sorajja, Rebecca T Hahn, Yanglu Zhao, Martin B Leon, Philippe Généreux\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EARLY TAVR trial demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) intervention was superior to clinical surveillance (CS) with delayed TAVR in patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS). Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maladaptive remodeling, symptom onset, and worse outcomes after TAVR. Whether elevated biomarkers identify asymptomatic patients more likely to benefit from early intervention is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A core laboratory measured N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Associations between biomarker levels and risk of the trial primary endpoint (death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization) and other secondary endpoints were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Interaction tests were performed to assess whether the treatment effect of early TAVR, compared with CS, differed according to biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 901 patients randomized in EARLY TAVR, 798 (89%) had biospecimens measured (median NT-proBNP 287 [145, 601]; median hs-cTnT 14.6 [10.5, 21.0]). Higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were broadly associated with higher event rates for multiple endpoints. In general, there was no significant interaction between baseline biomarkers and treatment group with respect to any composite or individual endpoint examined, although trends broadly demonstrated a greater relative benefit of early TAVR at lower biomarker levels. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT and treatment group with respect to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) (interaction p=0.04) and HFH alone (interaction p=0.03) such that the relative benefit of early TAVR was greater for patients with normal, rather than elevated, levels of hs-cTnT at baseline. For some endpoints, higher baseline NT-proBNP was associated with numerically greater absolute risk reduction with early TAVR than lower NT-proBNP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with asymptomatic severe high gradient AS, higher NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were broadly associated with higher event rates as expected. However, the relative benefit of an early TAVR strategy was consistent regardless of baseline biomarker levels and, contrary to our hypothesis, tended to be more pronounced in those with the lowest biomarker levels. These findings suggest limited value for single measurements of these biomarkers to guide the timing of TAVR in asymptomatic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":35.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期TAVR试验表明,在无症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中,早期经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)干预优于延迟TAVR的临床监测(CS)。心脏生物标志物与TAVR后适应性重构不良、症状发作和更糟糕的结果相关。升高的生物标志物是否能识别无症状患者更有可能从早期干预中获益尚不清楚。方法:在核心实验室检测n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)和高敏感性心肌肌钙蛋白T (hs-cTnT)。生物标志物水平与试验主要终点(死亡、中风或计划外心血管住院)和其他次要终点的风险之间的关联通过Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型进行检验。进行相互作用试验以评估早期TAVR与CS的治疗效果是否因生物标志物水平不同而不同。结果:在901例早期TAVR随机分组患者中,798例(89%)进行了生物标本检测(NT-proBNP中位数为287 [145,601];中位数hs-cTnT 14.6[10.5, 21.0])。较高水平的NT-proBNP和hs-cTnT与多个终点较高的事件发生率广泛相关。总的来说,基线生物标志物和治疗组之间没有显著的相互作用,尽管趋势普遍表明,在较低的生物标志物水平下,早期TAVR的相对益处更大。在死亡或心力衰竭住院(HFH)(相互作用p=0.04)和单独HFH(相互作用p=0.03)方面,hs-cTnT和治疗组之间存在显著的相互作用,因此在基线时hs-cTnT水平正常而不是升高的患者中,早期TAVR的相对获益更大。在一些终点,与较低的NT-proBNP水平相比,较高的基线NT-proBNP水平与早期TAVR的绝对风险降低有关。结论:在无症状严重高梯度AS患者中,NT-proBNP和hs-cTnT水平升高与预期的高事件发生率广泛相关。然而,无论基线生物标志物水平如何,早期TAVR策略的相对益处是一致的,并且与我们的假设相反,在生物标志物水平最低的患者中往往更为明显。这些发现表明,这些生物标志物的单一测量在指导无症状患者TAVR的时机方面价值有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients with Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Analysis from the EARLY TAVR Trial.

Background: The EARLY TAVR trial demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) intervention was superior to clinical surveillance (CS) with delayed TAVR in patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS). Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maladaptive remodeling, symptom onset, and worse outcomes after TAVR. Whether elevated biomarkers identify asymptomatic patients more likely to benefit from early intervention is unknown.

Methods: A core laboratory measured N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Associations between biomarker levels and risk of the trial primary endpoint (death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization) and other secondary endpoints were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Interaction tests were performed to assess whether the treatment effect of early TAVR, compared with CS, differed according to biomarker levels.

Results: Among 901 patients randomized in EARLY TAVR, 798 (89%) had biospecimens measured (median NT-proBNP 287 [145, 601]; median hs-cTnT 14.6 [10.5, 21.0]). Higher levels of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were broadly associated with higher event rates for multiple endpoints. In general, there was no significant interaction between baseline biomarkers and treatment group with respect to any composite or individual endpoint examined, although trends broadly demonstrated a greater relative benefit of early TAVR at lower biomarker levels. There was a significant interaction between hs-cTnT and treatment group with respect to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) (interaction p=0.04) and HFH alone (interaction p=0.03) such that the relative benefit of early TAVR was greater for patients with normal, rather than elevated, levels of hs-cTnT at baseline. For some endpoints, higher baseline NT-proBNP was associated with numerically greater absolute risk reduction with early TAVR than lower NT-proBNP levels.

Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic severe high gradient AS, higher NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were broadly associated with higher event rates as expected. However, the relative benefit of an early TAVR strategy was consistent regardless of baseline biomarker levels and, contrary to our hypothesis, tended to be more pronounced in those with the lowest biomarker levels. These findings suggest limited value for single measurements of these biomarkers to guide the timing of TAVR in asymptomatic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信