Roel Hoek, Sina Porouchani, Ruben W de Winter, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Pepijn A van Diemen, Ruurt A Jukema, Jos W Twisk, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Alexander W den Hartog, Niels J Verouden, Nils R Planken, Ibrahim Danad, Alexander Nap, Paul Knaapen
{"title":"静水压力对隐静脉移植物分流血流储备的影响。","authors":"Roel Hoek, Sina Porouchani, Ruben W de Winter, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Pepijn A van Diemen, Ruurt A Jukema, Jos W Twisk, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Alexander W den Hartog, Niels J Verouden, Nils R Planken, Ibrahim Danad, Alexander Nap, Paul Knaapen","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between height differences related to graft anatomy and physiological pressure indices in coronary bypass grafts has not been studied. We sought to study the impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve (FFR) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included were 66 symptomatic patients (76 SVGs) with prior coronary artery bypass grafting who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) preceding invasive coronary angiography with FFR interrogation of ≥ 1 SVGs. The graft course and height excursion were reconstructed based on CCTA images. The impact of hydrostatic pressure on FFR (corrected FFR) was calculated by adding or subtracting 0.077 mmHg to the distal coronary pressure for every millimeter height difference in a supine position between the SVG ostium and the pressure wire tip position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The height difference (mm) between the SVG ostium and pressure wire tip position was largest for single SVGs to the circumflex artery (Cx; -55.1 ± 17.0), followed by sequential SVGs to the Cx (-51.8 ± 17.3) and the right coronary artery (RCA; -36.7 ± 21.6). The correlation between height difference and uncorrected FFR was -0.59 (p < 0.001). Corrected FFR was lower as compared to uncorrected FFR in the overall cohort (0.86 ± 0.17 vs. 0.88 ± 0.18), in single SVGs to Cx (0.85 ± 0.17 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18), and in sequential SVGs to Cx (0.92 ± 0.14 vs. 0.96 ± 0.15) and RCA (0.82 ± 0.17 vs. 0.85 ± 0.21) (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrostatic pressure related to height differences along the course anatomy of SVGs can impact FFR measurements, with corrected FFR being significantly lower in SVGs to the Cx and sequential SVGs to the RCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure on Fractional Flow Reserve in Saphenous Vein Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Roel Hoek, Sina Porouchani, Ruben W de Winter, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Pepijn A van Diemen, Ruurt A Jukema, Jos W Twisk, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Alexander W den Hartog, Niels J Verouden, Nils R Planken, Ibrahim Danad, Alexander Nap, Paul Knaapen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between height differences related to graft anatomy and physiological pressure indices in coronary bypass grafts has not been studied. We sought to study the impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve (FFR) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included were 66 symptomatic patients (76 SVGs) with prior coronary artery bypass grafting who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) preceding invasive coronary angiography with FFR interrogation of ≥ 1 SVGs. The graft course and height excursion were reconstructed based on CCTA images. The impact of hydrostatic pressure on FFR (corrected FFR) was calculated by adding or subtracting 0.077 mmHg to the distal coronary pressure for every millimeter height difference in a supine position between the SVG ostium and the pressure wire tip position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The height difference (mm) between the SVG ostium and pressure wire tip position was largest for single SVGs to the circumflex artery (Cx; -55.1 ± 17.0), followed by sequential SVGs to the Cx (-51.8 ± 17.3) and the right coronary artery (RCA; -36.7 ± 21.6). The correlation between height difference and uncorrected FFR was -0.59 (p < 0.001). Corrected FFR was lower as compared to uncorrected FFR in the overall cohort (0.86 ± 0.17 vs. 0.88 ± 0.18), in single SVGs to Cx (0.85 ± 0.17 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18), and in sequential SVGs to Cx (0.92 ± 0.14 vs. 0.96 ± 0.15) and RCA (0.82 ± 0.17 vs. 0.85 ± 0.21) (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrostatic pressure related to height differences along the course anatomy of SVGs can impact FFR measurements, with corrected FFR being significantly lower in SVGs to the Cx and sequential SVGs to the RCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure on Fractional Flow Reserve in Saphenous Vein Grafts.
Background: The relationship between height differences related to graft anatomy and physiological pressure indices in coronary bypass grafts has not been studied. We sought to study the impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve (FFR) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).
Methods: Included were 66 symptomatic patients (76 SVGs) with prior coronary artery bypass grafting who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) preceding invasive coronary angiography with FFR interrogation of ≥ 1 SVGs. The graft course and height excursion were reconstructed based on CCTA images. The impact of hydrostatic pressure on FFR (corrected FFR) was calculated by adding or subtracting 0.077 mmHg to the distal coronary pressure for every millimeter height difference in a supine position between the SVG ostium and the pressure wire tip position.
Results: The height difference (mm) between the SVG ostium and pressure wire tip position was largest for single SVGs to the circumflex artery (Cx; -55.1 ± 17.0), followed by sequential SVGs to the Cx (-51.8 ± 17.3) and the right coronary artery (RCA; -36.7 ± 21.6). The correlation between height difference and uncorrected FFR was -0.59 (p < 0.001). Corrected FFR was lower as compared to uncorrected FFR in the overall cohort (0.86 ± 0.17 vs. 0.88 ± 0.18), in single SVGs to Cx (0.85 ± 0.17 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18), and in sequential SVGs to Cx (0.92 ± 0.14 vs. 0.96 ± 0.15) and RCA (0.82 ± 0.17 vs. 0.85 ± 0.21) (p < 0.001 for all).
Conclusions: Hydrostatic pressure related to height differences along the course anatomy of SVGs can impact FFR measurements, with corrected FFR being significantly lower in SVGs to the Cx and sequential SVGs to the RCA.
期刊介绍：
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
