Marc C. den Heijer, Gonneke E. Joustra, Karin M. Vermeulen, Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer, Robert A. Feijen
{"title":"内镜下鼻窦和颅底手术问卷(EES-Q)用于慢性鼻窦炎的验证。","authors":"Marc C. den Heijer, Gonneke E. Joustra, Karin M. Vermeulen, Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer, Robert A. Feijen","doi":"10.1111/coa.14306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Multicentre know-groups validity study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 4","pages":"733-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) for Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis\",\"authors\":\"Marc C. den Heijer, Gonneke E. Joustra, Karin M. Vermeulen, Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer, Robert A. Feijen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multicentre know-groups validity study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"733-738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14306\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) for Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Objectives
The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.
Design
Multicentre know-groups validity study.
Setting
Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.
Participants
A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.
Main Outcome Measures
Mann–Whitney U test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.
Results
The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.
Conclusion
We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.