内镜下鼻窦和颅底手术问卷(EES-Q)用于慢性鼻窦炎的验证。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Marc C. den Heijer, Gonneke E. Joustra, Karin M. Vermeulen, Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer, Robert A. Feijen
{"title":"内镜下鼻窦和颅底手术问卷(EES-Q)用于慢性鼻窦炎的验证。","authors":"Marc C. den Heijer,&nbsp;Gonneke E. Joustra,&nbsp;Karin M. Vermeulen,&nbsp;Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer,&nbsp;Robert A. Feijen","doi":"10.1111/coa.14306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Multicentre know-groups validity study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 4","pages":"733-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) for Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis\",\"authors\":\"Marc C. den Heijer,&nbsp;Gonneke E. Joustra,&nbsp;Karin M. Vermeulen,&nbsp;Astrid G. W. Korsten-Meijer,&nbsp;Robert A. Feijen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multicentre know-groups validity study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"733-738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14306\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内窥镜鼻窦和颅底手术问卷(EES-Q)是唯一已知的用于评估慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的工具,涉及三个健康领域:身体、社会和心理。最初,验证EES- q以评估内镜下鼻内手术(EES)对HRQoL的影响。我们的目标是将EES-Q用于所有CRS患者,无论其治疗阶段如何。先前,我们证明了第三期CRS患者的HRQoL明显比健康人差。本研究的目的是在分布在多个中心的二级转诊队列中验证这些发现,从而将EES-Q的适用性扩展到所有CRS患者。设计:多中心知识团体效度研究。环境:五个二级转诊医院和一个三级转诊中心。参与者:共纳入100名无鼻窦炎史或目前住院治疗的健康对照受试者,100名来自二级中心无EES史的CRS患者和100名来自三级中心的CRS患者。主要结果测量:采用Mann-Whitney U检验来确定不同队列之间领域得分和EES-Q得分的差异。结果:与健康对照组相比,第二和第三队列的中位EES-Q分数以及身体、心理和社会领域分数显著高于健康对照组。二级和三级队列之间没有观察到显著差异。结论:EES-Q是一种适用于CRS的HRQoL仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) for Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Validation of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) for Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Objectives

The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) is the only known instrument designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across all three health domains: physical, social, and psychological. Initially, the EES-Q was validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. Our goal is to use the EES-Q for all CRS patients, regardless of their treatment phase. Previously, we demonstrated a significantly worse HRQoL in tertiary CRS patients compared to healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to validate these findings in a secondary referral cohort distributed across multiple centres, thereby extending the applicability of the EES-Q to all CRS patients.

Design

Multicentre know-groups validity study.

Setting

Five secondary referral hospitals and one tertiary referral centre.

Participants

A total of 100 healthy control subjects without any history of sinusitis or current hospital-based medical treatment, 100 CRS patients from a secondary centre with no history of EES, and 100 CRS patients from a tertiary centre were included.

Main Outcome Measures

Mann–Whitney U test was performed to identify differences in domain scores and EES-Q scores between the different cohorts.

Results

The median EES-Q scores, as well as the physical, psychological, and social domain scores, were significantly higher in the secondary and tertiary cohorts compared to the healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between the secondary and tertiary cohorts.

Conclusion

We validated the EES-Q as an HRQoL instrument for use in CRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信