孟德尔随机化在心血管疾病中的应用:2003年至2024年文献计量学分析和可视化。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1159/000545277
Sitong Guo, Dandan Xu, Shiran Qin, Chunxia Chen, Xiaoyu Chen
{"title":"孟德尔随机化在心血管疾病中的应用:2003年至2024年文献计量学分析和可视化。","authors":"Sitong Guo, Dandan Xu, Shiran Qin, Chunxia Chen, Xiaoyu Chen","doi":"10.1159/000545277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mendelian randomization (MR) is an innovative epidemiological research method. In order to summarize and clarify the research status of MR related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and point out the possible future development direction, we conducted a comprehensive and multidimensional bibliometric analysis of the literature published in this field from 2003 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 1,870 articles published between 2003 and 2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using VOSviewer, R software, bibliometric online analysis tool, and CiteSpace software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CVD-related MR research demonstrated an overall upward trend, with the USA leading in terms of publication output, followed by the UK and China. The most prolific institution in this field was the University of Bristol, and Smith GD, who had the highest number of publications (n = 103), was also affiliated with this institution. The European Heart Journal (36 publications, 5,023 citations) was the most cited journal. Related topics of frontiers will still focus on MR, coronary heart disease, heart failure, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the scope of MR studies continues to expand, especially the number of measurable features continues to increase, the need for rigorous methods and critical interpretation of MR findings becomes increasingly apparent. However, this ease of use can compromise the reliability of study results due to methodological flaws and publication bias, thereby affecting the perceived significance of the results. Nonetheless, with the emergence of large genetic datasets supporting two-sample MR, resources such as MR-Base and PhenoScanner, MR remains a powerful method for identifying potential pathogenic features in cardiometabolic and other diseases. In addition, it plays a crucial role in prioritizing drug targets for entry into clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Disease: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization from 2003 to 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Sitong Guo, Dandan Xu, Shiran Qin, Chunxia Chen, Xiaoyu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mendelian randomization (MR) is an innovative epidemiological research method. In order to summarize and clarify the research status of MR related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and point out the possible future development direction, we conducted a comprehensive and multidimensional bibliometric analysis of the literature published in this field from 2003 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 1,870 articles published between 2003 and 2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using VOSviewer, R software, bibliometric online analysis tool, and CiteSpace software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CVD-related MR research demonstrated an overall upward trend, with the USA leading in terms of publication output, followed by the UK and China. The most prolific institution in this field was the University of Bristol, and Smith GD, who had the highest number of publications (n = 103), was also affiliated with this institution. The European Heart Journal (36 publications, 5,023 citations) was the most cited journal. Related topics of frontiers will still focus on MR, coronary heart disease, heart failure, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the scope of MR studies continues to expand, especially the number of measurable features continues to increase, the need for rigorous methods and critical interpretation of MR findings becomes increasingly apparent. However, this ease of use can compromise the reliability of study results due to methodological flaws and publication bias, thereby affecting the perceived significance of the results. Nonetheless, with the emergence of large genetic datasets supporting two-sample MR, resources such as MR-Base and PhenoScanner, MR remains a powerful method for identifying potential pathogenic features in cardiometabolic and other diseases. In addition, it plays a crucial role in prioritizing drug targets for entry into clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization, MR)是一种创新性的流行病学研究方法。为了总结和阐明MR与心血管疾病(CVD)相关的研究现状,指出未来可能的发展方向,我们对2003 - 2024年该领域发表的文献进行了全面、多维度的文献计量学分析。方法:利用VOSviewer、R软件、文献计量在线分析工具和CiteSpace软件,对2003 - 2024年间发表于Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)的1870篇论文进行分析。结果:与cvd相关的MR研究总体呈上升趋势,其中美国在发表量方面领先,其次是英国和中国。该领域最多产的机构是布里斯托尔大学,发表论文最多的Smith GD (n = 103)也隶属于该机构。欧洲心脏杂志(36篇出版物,5023次引用)是被引用最多的杂志。相关前沿课题仍将集中在孟德尔随机化、冠心病、心力衰竭、c反应蛋白、胆固醇和体重指数等方面。结论:随着MR研究范围的不断扩大,特别是可测量特征的数量不断增加,对MR研究结果的严格方法和批判性解释的需求变得越来越明显。然而,由于方法学缺陷和发表偏倚,这种易用性可能会损害研究结果的可靠性,从而影响结果的感知意义。尽管如此,随着支持双样本MR的大型遗传数据集的出现,MR- base和PhenoScanner等资源,MR仍然是识别心脏代谢和其他疾病潜在致病特征的有力方法。此外,它在确定进入临床试验的药物靶点的优先顺序方面起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Disease: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization from 2003 to 2024.

Introduction: Mendelian randomization (MR) is an innovative epidemiological research method. In order to summarize and clarify the research status of MR related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and point out the possible future development direction, we conducted a comprehensive and multidimensional bibliometric analysis of the literature published in this field from 2003 to 2024.

Methods: We analyzed 1,870 articles published between 2003 and 2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using VOSviewer, R software, bibliometric online analysis tool, and CiteSpace software.

Results: CVD-related MR research demonstrated an overall upward trend, with the USA leading in terms of publication output, followed by the UK and China. The most prolific institution in this field was the University of Bristol, and Smith GD, who had the highest number of publications (n = 103), was also affiliated with this institution. The European Heart Journal (36 publications, 5,023 citations) was the most cited journal. Related topics of frontiers will still focus on MR, coronary heart disease, heart failure, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, and body mass index.

Conclusions: As the scope of MR studies continues to expand, especially the number of measurable features continues to increase, the need for rigorous methods and critical interpretation of MR findings becomes increasingly apparent. However, this ease of use can compromise the reliability of study results due to methodological flaws and publication bias, thereby affecting the perceived significance of the results. Nonetheless, with the emergence of large genetic datasets supporting two-sample MR, resources such as MR-Base and PhenoScanner, MR remains a powerful method for identifying potential pathogenic features in cardiometabolic and other diseases. In addition, it plays a crucial role in prioritizing drug targets for entry into clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信