Barrett食道患者的总体死亡率和原因特异性死亡率:基于人群研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani
{"title":"Barrett食道患者的总体死亡率和原因特异性死亡率:基于人群研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12-15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1-1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98-19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58-6.17) among BE patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Tarek Sawas, Alex R Jones, Rand Alsawas, Rachna Talluri, Hayley Rogers, Olgert Bardhi, David Spezia-Lindner, Danielle Gerberi, Siddharth Singh, M Hassan Murad, Nicholas J Shaheen, David A Katzka, Sachin Wani\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12-15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1-1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98-19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58-6.17) among BE patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的指南推荐内镜下监测巴雷特食管(BE),但没有考虑与食管癌(EC)无关的竞争性死亡率。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以估计BE患者的EC和非EC死亡率风险。方法:我们检索了多个数据库中报道BE死亡率的研究。我们纳入了提供标准化死亡率(SMR)的基于人群的研究。主要结局是所有原因的SMR,包括EC和非EC病因。SMR的计算方法是将观察到的死亡率除以预期死亡率。采用随机效应模型对smr的对数形式进行汇总。结果:我们检索到2826篇文章,其中包括7项研究(n=34,454)。与人群对照组相比,BE患者的全因死亡率升高[汇总SMR为1.24 (95% CI:1.01 - 1.53)],部分原因是EC死亡风险增加[SMR为8.98 (95 CI:5.12-15.77)]。排除EC死亡率后,死亡率风险仍然增加,但有所降低[SMR:1.21 (95% CI:1-1.46)]。非ec恶性肿瘤的死亡风险没有增加[SMR:1.22 (95% CI:0.82-1.82)]或非癌症病因导致的死亡率[SMR:1.13 (95% CI:0.90 - 1.43)]。BE患者因心血管疾病导致的死亡更高[SMR:1.16 (95% CI:1.02-1.33)]。BE患者死于非癌症原因的可能性是EC患者的10倍[RR: 10.71 (95% CI: 5.98 - 19.16)]。排除基线时流行EC的研究(3项研究)的亚组分析也显示,BE患者的全因死亡率[SMR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07 - 1.18)和EC死亡率[SMR: 4.7 (95% CI: 3.58 - 6.17)]增加。结论:BE患者表现出更高的全因死亡率,部分原因是EC死亡率的风险。有必要采取个性化的监测方法,在认识到更广泛的死亡风险的同时,降低EC的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients.

Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model.

Results: Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01-1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12-15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1-1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98-19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58-6.17) among BE patients.

Discussion: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信