{"title":"优化膀胱磁共振成像：通过深度学习加快扫描时间，提高图像质量。","authors":"Erjia Guo, Li Chen, Lili Xu, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Qianyu Peng, Jinxia Zhu, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Zhengyu Jin, Gumuyang Zhang, Hao Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04895-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the value of deep learning (DL) in T2-weighted imaging (T2<sub>DL</sub>) of the bladder regarding acquisition time (TA), image quality, and diagnostic confidence compared to standard T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) imaging (T2<sub>S</sub>).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prospectively enrolled a total of 28 consecutive patients for the evaluation of bladder cancer. T2<sub>S</sub> and T2<sub>DL</sub> sequences in three planes were performed for each participant, and acquisition time was compared between the two acquisition protocols. The image evaluation was conducted independently by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts, noise, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence, with 5 indicating the best quality. Additionally, T2 scoring based on Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was performed by two readers.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to T2<sub>S</sub>, the acquisition time of T2<sub>DL</sub> was reduced by 49.4% in the axial and by 43.8% in the coronal and sagittal orientations. The severity and impact of artifacts and noise levels were superior in T2<sub>DL</sub> versus T2<sub>S</sub> (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The overall image quality in T2<sub>DL</sub> was demonstrated to be higher compared to that in T2<sub>S</sub> in axial and sagittal imaging (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The diagnostic confidence and T2 scoring of both sequences in all planes did not differ (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility of T2-weighted imaging with DL reconstruction of bladder MR in clinical practice. T2<sub>DL</sub> achieved a reduction in acquisition time, superior lesion detectability, and overall image quality with similar diagnostic confidence and T2 score compared to the standard T2 TSE sequence.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 10","pages":"4772 - 4782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing bladder magnetic resonance imaging: accelerating scan time and improving image quality through deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Erjia Guo, Li Chen, Lili Xu, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Qianyu Peng, Jinxia Zhu, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Zhengyu Jin, Gumuyang Zhang, Hao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04895-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the value of deep learning (DL) in T2-weighted imaging (T2<sub>DL</sub>) of the bladder regarding acquisition time (TA), image quality, and diagnostic confidence compared to standard T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) imaging (T2<sub>S</sub>).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prospectively enrolled a total of 28 consecutive patients for the evaluation of bladder cancer. T2<sub>S</sub> and T2<sub>DL</sub> sequences in three planes were performed for each participant, and acquisition time was compared between the two acquisition protocols. The image evaluation was conducted independently by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts, noise, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence, with 5 indicating the best quality. Additionally, T2 scoring based on Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was performed by two readers.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to T2<sub>S</sub>, the acquisition time of T2<sub>DL</sub> was reduced by 49.4% in the axial and by 43.8% in the coronal and sagittal orientations. The severity and impact of artifacts and noise levels were superior in T2<sub>DL</sub> versus T2<sub>S</sub> (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The overall image quality in T2<sub>DL</sub> was demonstrated to be higher compared to that in T2<sub>S</sub> in axial and sagittal imaging (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The diagnostic confidence and T2 scoring of both sequences in all planes did not differ (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility of T2-weighted imaging with DL reconstruction of bladder MR in clinical practice. T2<sub>DL</sub> achieved a reduction in acquisition time, superior lesion detectability, and overall image quality with similar diagnostic confidence and T2 score compared to the standard T2 TSE sequence.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\"50 10\",\"pages\":\"4772 - 4782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04895-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04895-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing bladder magnetic resonance imaging: accelerating scan time and improving image quality through deep learning
Purpose
To investigate the value of deep learning (DL) in T2-weighted imaging (T2DL) of the bladder regarding acquisition time (TA), image quality, and diagnostic confidence compared to standard T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) imaging (T2S).
Methods
We prospectively enrolled a total of 28 consecutive patients for the evaluation of bladder cancer. T2S and T2DL sequences in three planes were performed for each participant, and acquisition time was compared between the two acquisition protocols. The image evaluation was conducted independently by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts, noise, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence, with 5 indicating the best quality. Additionally, T2 scoring based on Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was performed by two readers.
Results
Compared to T2S, the acquisition time of T2DL was reduced by 49.4% in the axial and by 43.8% in the coronal and sagittal orientations. The severity and impact of artifacts and noise levels were superior in T2DL versus T2S (both p < 0.05). The overall image quality in T2DL was demonstrated to be higher compared to that in T2S in axial and sagittal imaging (both p < 0.05). The diagnostic confidence and T2 scoring of both sequences in all planes did not differ (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Our study preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility of T2-weighted imaging with DL reconstruction of bladder MR in clinical practice. T2DL achieved a reduction in acquisition time, superior lesion detectability, and overall image quality with similar diagnostic confidence and T2 score compared to the standard T2 TSE sequence.
期刊介绍：
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
