没有证据表明魔鬼面部肿瘤病(DFTD)存在不同的转录组亚群

IF 3.2 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Cleopatra Petrohilos, Emma Peel, Kimberley C. Batley, Samantha Fox, Carolyn J. Hogg, Katherine Belov
{"title":"没有证据表明魔鬼面部肿瘤病(DFTD)存在不同的转录组亚群","authors":"Cleopatra Petrohilos,&nbsp;Emma Peel,&nbsp;Kimberley C. Batley,&nbsp;Samantha Fox,&nbsp;Carolyn J. Hogg,&nbsp;Katherine Belov","doi":"10.1111/eva.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contagious cancers represent one of the least understood types of infections in wildlife. Devil Facial Tumor Disease (comprised of two different contagious cancers, DFT1 and DFT2) has led to an 80% decline in the Tasmanian devil (<i>Sarcophilus harrisii</i> ) population at the regional level since it was first observed in 1996. There are currently no treatment options for the disease, and research efforts are focused on vaccine development. Although DFT1 is clonal, phylogenomic studies have identified different genetic variants of the pathogen. We postulated that different genetic strains may have different gene expression profiles and would therefore require different vaccine components. Here, we aimed to test this hypothesis by applying two types of unsupervised clustering (hierarchical and k-means) to 35 DFT1 transcriptomes selected from the disease's four major phylogenetic clades. The two algorithms produced conflicting results, and there was low support for either method individually. Validation metrics, such as the Gap statistic method, the Elbow method, and the Silhouette method, were ambiguous, contradictory, or indicated that our dataset only consisted of a single cluster. Collectively, our results show that the different phylogenetic clades of DFT1 all have similar gene expression profiles. Previous studies have suggested that transcriptomic differences exist between tumours from different locations. However, our study differs in that it considers both tumor purity and genotypic clade when analysing differences between DFTD biopsies. These results have important implications for therapeutic development, as they indicate that a single vaccine or treatment approach has the potential to be effective for a large cross-section of DFT1 tumors. As one of the largest studies to use transcriptomics to investigate phenotypic variation within a single contagious cancer, it also provides novel insight into this unique group of diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.70091","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Evidence for Distinct Transcriptomic Subgroups of Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD)\",\"authors\":\"Cleopatra Petrohilos,&nbsp;Emma Peel,&nbsp;Kimberley C. Batley,&nbsp;Samantha Fox,&nbsp;Carolyn J. Hogg,&nbsp;Katherine Belov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eva.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contagious cancers represent one of the least understood types of infections in wildlife. Devil Facial Tumor Disease (comprised of two different contagious cancers, DFT1 and DFT2) has led to an 80% decline in the Tasmanian devil (<i>Sarcophilus harrisii</i> ) population at the regional level since it was first observed in 1996. There are currently no treatment options for the disease, and research efforts are focused on vaccine development. Although DFT1 is clonal, phylogenomic studies have identified different genetic variants of the pathogen. We postulated that different genetic strains may have different gene expression profiles and would therefore require different vaccine components. Here, we aimed to test this hypothesis by applying two types of unsupervised clustering (hierarchical and k-means) to 35 DFT1 transcriptomes selected from the disease's four major phylogenetic clades. The two algorithms produced conflicting results, and there was low support for either method individually. Validation metrics, such as the Gap statistic method, the Elbow method, and the Silhouette method, were ambiguous, contradictory, or indicated that our dataset only consisted of a single cluster. Collectively, our results show that the different phylogenetic clades of DFT1 all have similar gene expression profiles. Previous studies have suggested that transcriptomic differences exist between tumours from different locations. However, our study differs in that it considers both tumor purity and genotypic clade when analysing differences between DFTD biopsies. These results have important implications for therapeutic development, as they indicate that a single vaccine or treatment approach has the potential to be effective for a large cross-section of DFT1 tumors. As one of the largest studies to use transcriptomics to investigate phenotypic variation within a single contagious cancer, it also provides novel insight into this unique group of diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Applications\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.70091\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传染性癌症是野生动物中最不为人所知的感染类型之一。魔鬼面部肿瘤病(由两种不同的传染性癌症,DFT1和DFT2组成)自1996年首次发现以来,已导致区域一级塔斯马尼亚魔鬼(Sarcophilus harrisii)种群减少80%。目前还没有针对这种疾病的治疗方案,研究工作集中在疫苗开发上。虽然DFT1是克隆的,但系统基因组学研究已经确定了该病原体的不同遗传变异。我们假设不同的遗传菌株可能具有不同的基因表达谱,因此需要不同的疫苗成分。在这里,我们旨在通过应用两种类型的无监督聚类(分层和k-means)对从该疾病的四个主要系统发育分支中选择的35个DFT1转录组进行检验。这两种算法产生了相互矛盾的结果,并且对任何一种方法单独的支持度都很低。验证指标,如Gap统计方法、肘部方法和廓形方法,是模糊的、矛盾的,或者表明我们的数据集仅由单个集群组成。总之,我们的研究结果表明,DFT1的不同进化枝都具有相似的基因表达谱。先前的研究表明,不同位置的肿瘤存在转录组学差异。然而,我们的研究的不同之处在于,在分析DFTD活检的差异时,它同时考虑了肿瘤纯度和基因型分支。这些结果对治疗发展具有重要意义,因为它们表明单一疫苗或治疗方法有可能对大断面DFT1肿瘤有效。作为使用转录组学研究单一传染性癌症表型变异的最大研究之一,它也为这一独特的疾病群体提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

No Evidence for Distinct Transcriptomic Subgroups of Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD)

No Evidence for Distinct Transcriptomic Subgroups of Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD)

Contagious cancers represent one of the least understood types of infections in wildlife. Devil Facial Tumor Disease (comprised of two different contagious cancers, DFT1 and DFT2) has led to an 80% decline in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii ) population at the regional level since it was first observed in 1996. There are currently no treatment options for the disease, and research efforts are focused on vaccine development. Although DFT1 is clonal, phylogenomic studies have identified different genetic variants of the pathogen. We postulated that different genetic strains may have different gene expression profiles and would therefore require different vaccine components. Here, we aimed to test this hypothesis by applying two types of unsupervised clustering (hierarchical and k-means) to 35 DFT1 transcriptomes selected from the disease's four major phylogenetic clades. The two algorithms produced conflicting results, and there was low support for either method individually. Validation metrics, such as the Gap statistic method, the Elbow method, and the Silhouette method, were ambiguous, contradictory, or indicated that our dataset only consisted of a single cluster. Collectively, our results show that the different phylogenetic clades of DFT1 all have similar gene expression profiles. Previous studies have suggested that transcriptomic differences exist between tumours from different locations. However, our study differs in that it considers both tumor purity and genotypic clade when analysing differences between DFTD biopsies. These results have important implications for therapeutic development, as they indicate that a single vaccine or treatment approach has the potential to be effective for a large cross-section of DFT1 tumors. As one of the largest studies to use transcriptomics to investigate phenotypic variation within a single contagious cancer, it also provides novel insight into this unique group of diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信