岩浆镍铜(PGE)硫化物矿床研究进展及其对中国新元古代构造背景的制约

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geological Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/gj.5105
Huidong Yu, Haoran Chen, Huawen Cao, Nuru Said, Changcheng Huang, Zihan Ma, Bin Xiao, Haifeng Chen, Hao Zou
{"title":"岩浆镍铜(PGE)硫化物矿床研究进展及其对中国新元古代构造背景的制约","authors":"Huidong Yu,&nbsp;Haoran Chen,&nbsp;Huawen Cao,&nbsp;Nuru Said,&nbsp;Changcheng Huang,&nbsp;Zihan Ma,&nbsp;Bin Xiao,&nbsp;Haifeng Chen,&nbsp;Hao Zou","doi":"10.1002/gj.5105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits are the primary global sources of nickel, copper and platinum group elements (PGE). The study of these deposits is critical for mineral exploration and holds important economic implications. This paper reviews recent advances in understanding magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits and their related magmatism. Findings reveal that these deposits have an uneven global distribution and a wide range of classifications. The Proterozoic era represents the main period of mineralisation, and the mineralisation setting is closely related to continental rifts, mantle plumes and collision orogenic belts. An ongoing debate exists between the ‘magma conduit’ and ‘deep-multiple magma chamber segregation’ models, which differ in mineralisation location, magma intrusion mechanisms and the role of external sulphur addition. The primary mechanisms of sulphide segregation include rapid cooling, crystal differentiation and crustal contamination. Furthermore, this paper examines the spatial–temporal distribution and mineralisation dynamic settings of Neoproterozoic magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits in China and their relationship to the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent. These Neoproterozoic deposits are located along the margins of the Yangtze, North China and Tarim blocks. They formed in five different stages, 1000–960, 900–850, 830–800, 760–740 and 650–620 Ma, corresponding to the following tectonic settings, respectively: (1) a back-arc extensional setting before the convergence of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks; (2) a post-orogenic extensional setting following the convergence between the Yangtze and North China blocks; (3) a rift setting related to the first Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (830–795 Ma) within the Yangtze Block or North China Block; (4) a rift setting related to the second Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (780–745 Ma) within the Tarim Block and (5) an intraplate rift setting within the Yangtze Block. The evolving mineralisation dynamic settings of these deposits indicate that their mineralisation is directly related to large-scale mafic–ultramafic magmatism during the Neoproterozoic and the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Journal","volume":"60 4","pages":"807-823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) Sulphide Deposits and Their Constraints on Neoproterozoic Tectonic Settings of China\",\"authors\":\"Huidong Yu,&nbsp;Haoran Chen,&nbsp;Huawen Cao,&nbsp;Nuru Said,&nbsp;Changcheng Huang,&nbsp;Zihan Ma,&nbsp;Bin Xiao,&nbsp;Haifeng Chen,&nbsp;Hao Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gj.5105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits are the primary global sources of nickel, copper and platinum group elements (PGE). The study of these deposits is critical for mineral exploration and holds important economic implications. This paper reviews recent advances in understanding magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits and their related magmatism. Findings reveal that these deposits have an uneven global distribution and a wide range of classifications. The Proterozoic era represents the main period of mineralisation, and the mineralisation setting is closely related to continental rifts, mantle plumes and collision orogenic belts. An ongoing debate exists between the ‘magma conduit’ and ‘deep-multiple magma chamber segregation’ models, which differ in mineralisation location, magma intrusion mechanisms and the role of external sulphur addition. The primary mechanisms of sulphide segregation include rapid cooling, crystal differentiation and crustal contamination. Furthermore, this paper examines the spatial–temporal distribution and mineralisation dynamic settings of Neoproterozoic magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits in China and their relationship to the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent. These Neoproterozoic deposits are located along the margins of the Yangtze, North China and Tarim blocks. They formed in five different stages, 1000–960, 900–850, 830–800, 760–740 and 650–620 Ma, corresponding to the following tectonic settings, respectively: (1) a back-arc extensional setting before the convergence of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks; (2) a post-orogenic extensional setting following the convergence between the Yangtze and North China blocks; (3) a rift setting related to the first Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (830–795 Ma) within the Yangtze Block or North China Block; (4) a rift setting related to the second Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (780–745 Ma) within the Tarim Block and (5) an intraplate rift setting within the Yangtze Block. The evolving mineralisation dynamic settings of these deposits indicate that their mineralisation is directly related to large-scale mafic–ultramafic magmatism during the Neoproterozoic and the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geological Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"807-823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gj.5105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gj.5105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

岩浆镍铜(PGE)硫化物矿床是全球镍、铜和铂族元素(PGE)的主要来源。这些矿床的研究对矿产勘探至关重要,并具有重要的经济意义。本文综述了岩浆型镍铜(PGE)硫化物矿床及其相关岩浆作用的研究进展。结果表明,这些矿床在全球分布不均匀,分类范围广。元古代是成矿的主要时期,成矿环境与大陆裂谷、地幔柱和碰撞造山带密切相关。在“岩浆管道”和“深部多岩浆房分离”模型之间存在着持续的争论,这两种模型在矿化位置、岩浆侵入机制和外部加硫作用方面存在差异。硫化物偏析的主要机制包括快速冷却、晶体分异和地壳污染。此外,本文还探讨了中国新元古代岩浆镍铜硫化物矿床的时空分布、成矿动力学背景及其与Rodinia超大陆的辐合和分裂的关系。这些新元古代沉积位于扬子、华北和塔里木地块的边缘。它们分别形成于1000 ~ 960 Ma、900 ~ 850 Ma、830 ~ 800 Ma、760 ~ 740 Ma和650 ~ 620 Ma 5个不同阶段,分别对应于以下构造环境:(1)扬子地块和华夏地块辐合前的弧后伸展环境;(2)扬子地块与华北地块辐合后的造山后伸展环境;(3)与扬子地块或华北地块第一次新元古代地幔柱事件(830-795 Ma)有关的裂谷背景;(4)塔里木地块内与第二次新元古代地幔柱事件(780-745 Ma)有关的裂谷环境;(5)扬子地块内的板内裂谷环境。这些矿床的演化成矿动力背景表明,它们的成矿作用与新元古代大规模基性-超基性岩浆活动和Rodinia超大陆的汇聚和分裂有直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advances in Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) Sulphide Deposits and Their Constraints on Neoproterozoic Tectonic Settings of China

Advances in Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) Sulphide Deposits and Their Constraints on Neoproterozoic Tectonic Settings of China

Magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits are the primary global sources of nickel, copper and platinum group elements (PGE). The study of these deposits is critical for mineral exploration and holds important economic implications. This paper reviews recent advances in understanding magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits and their related magmatism. Findings reveal that these deposits have an uneven global distribution and a wide range of classifications. The Proterozoic era represents the main period of mineralisation, and the mineralisation setting is closely related to continental rifts, mantle plumes and collision orogenic belts. An ongoing debate exists between the ‘magma conduit’ and ‘deep-multiple magma chamber segregation’ models, which differ in mineralisation location, magma intrusion mechanisms and the role of external sulphur addition. The primary mechanisms of sulphide segregation include rapid cooling, crystal differentiation and crustal contamination. Furthermore, this paper examines the spatial–temporal distribution and mineralisation dynamic settings of Neoproterozoic magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulphide deposits in China and their relationship to the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent. These Neoproterozoic deposits are located along the margins of the Yangtze, North China and Tarim blocks. They formed in five different stages, 1000–960, 900–850, 830–800, 760–740 and 650–620 Ma, corresponding to the following tectonic settings, respectively: (1) a back-arc extensional setting before the convergence of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks; (2) a post-orogenic extensional setting following the convergence between the Yangtze and North China blocks; (3) a rift setting related to the first Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (830–795 Ma) within the Yangtze Block or North China Block; (4) a rift setting related to the second Neoproterozoic mantle plume event (780–745 Ma) within the Tarim Block and (5) an intraplate rift setting within the Yangtze Block. The evolving mineralisation dynamic settings of these deposits indicate that their mineralisation is directly related to large-scale mafic–ultramafic magmatism during the Neoproterozoic and the convergence and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geological Journal
Geological Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
269
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: In recent years there has been a growth of specialist journals within geological sciences. Nevertheless, there is an important role for a journal of an interdisciplinary kind. Traditionally, GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL has been such a journal and continues in its aim of promoting interest in all branches of the Geological Sciences, through publication of original research papers and review articles. The journal publishes Special Issues with a common theme or regional coverage e.g. Chinese Dinosaurs; Tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean, Triassic basins of the Central and North Atlantic Borderlands). These are extensively cited. The Journal has a particular interest in publishing papers on regional case studies from any global locality which have conclusions of general interest. Such papers may emphasize aspects across the full spectrum of geological sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信