地表和管道侵蚀中产沙量、土壤电导率和pH值相关性的实验室研究

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Soheila Esmailian, Mehdi Pajouhesh, Khodayar Abdollahi, Nasrin Gharahi, Gholamreza Shams
{"title":"地表和管道侵蚀中产沙量、土壤电导率和pH值相关性的实验室研究","authors":"Soheila Esmailian,&nbsp;Mehdi Pajouhesh,&nbsp;Khodayar Abdollahi,&nbsp;Nasrin Gharahi,&nbsp;Gholamreza Shams","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Soil erosion, driven by factors such as water, wind, tillage and so forth, has significant impacts on both humanity and the environment. Soil erosion, including surface and subsurface (piping) erosion, significantly affects the environment and infrastructure. This research examines the impact of soil properties, that is, electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, on sediment yield in both surface and piping erosion. Rigorous laboratory experiments were conducted on slopes of 5%, 10% and 15%, using a soil profile that consisted of a 5 cm water-restrictive layer of clay loam and a 15 cm topsoil layer of loam. Three experimental configurations were devised: exclusive pipe flow at 27 L h<sup>−1</sup> (M1), rainfall intensity at 30 mm h<sup>−1</sup> (M2), and a composite scenario integrating both rainfall and pipe flow (M3), with each configuration executed three times. The pipe flow was simulated using a plastic tube with a 1 cm diameter, placed on top of the water-restrictive layer, which helped create conditions for subsurface flow. Results showed that sediment yield predictions varied with slope. For surface erosion, the most favourable performance was observed at 5% slope with pipe flow (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.76, NSE = 0.76), while combined scenarios performed adequately (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.71). At 10% slope, performance was good (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.66, NSE = 0.65), and at 15%, results ranged from acceptable to very good. In piping erosion, the combined scenario consistently performed best (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.78–0.91, NSE = 0.67–0.82), particularly at 5% and 15% slopes. These findings offer valuable insights into erosion dynamics and can help improve soil management strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory Insights Into the Correlation Between Sediment Yield, Soil Electrical Conductivity and pH in Surface and Piping Erosion\",\"authors\":\"Soheila Esmailian,&nbsp;Mehdi Pajouhesh,&nbsp;Khodayar Abdollahi,&nbsp;Nasrin Gharahi,&nbsp;Gholamreza Shams\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Soil erosion, driven by factors such as water, wind, tillage and so forth, has significant impacts on both humanity and the environment. Soil erosion, including surface and subsurface (piping) erosion, significantly affects the environment and infrastructure. This research examines the impact of soil properties, that is, electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, on sediment yield in both surface and piping erosion. Rigorous laboratory experiments were conducted on slopes of 5%, 10% and 15%, using a soil profile that consisted of a 5 cm water-restrictive layer of clay loam and a 15 cm topsoil layer of loam. Three experimental configurations were devised: exclusive pipe flow at 27 L h<sup>−1</sup> (M1), rainfall intensity at 30 mm h<sup>−1</sup> (M2), and a composite scenario integrating both rainfall and pipe flow (M3), with each configuration executed three times. The pipe flow was simulated using a plastic tube with a 1 cm diameter, placed on top of the water-restrictive layer, which helped create conditions for subsurface flow. Results showed that sediment yield predictions varied with slope. For surface erosion, the most favourable performance was observed at 5% slope with pipe flow (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.76, NSE = 0.76), while combined scenarios performed adequately (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.71). At 10% slope, performance was good (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.66, NSE = 0.65), and at 15%, results ranged from acceptable to very good. In piping erosion, the combined scenario consistently performed best (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.78–0.91, NSE = 0.67–0.82), particularly at 5% and 15% slopes. These findings offer valuable insights into erosion dynamics and can help improve soil management strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤侵蚀是由水、风、耕作等因素驱动的,对人类和环境都有重大影响。土壤侵蚀,包括地表和地下(管道)侵蚀,严重影响环境和基础设施。本研究考察了土壤性质,即电导率(EC)和pH值,对地表和管道侵蚀的产沙量的影响。在5%、10%和15%坡度的斜坡上进行了严格的实验室实验,使用的土壤剖面由5厘米的粘土壤土限水层和15厘米的壤土表土层组成。设计了三种实验配置:27 L h−1 (M1)的管道流量,30 mm h−1 (M2)的降雨强度,以及集成降雨量和管道流量(M3)的复合场景,每种配置执行三次。管道流动模拟使用直径为1厘米的塑料管,放置在水限制层的顶部,这有助于为地下流动创造条件。结果表明,产沙量预测随坡度的变化而变化。在地表侵蚀方面,坡度为5%且有管道流的情况下表现最佳(R2 = 0.76, NSE = 0.76),而综合情况下表现良好(R2 = 0.71)。在坡度为10%时,表现良好(R2 = 0.66, NSE = 0.65),在坡度为15%时,结果从可接受到非常好。在管道侵蚀方面,综合方案的效果最好(R2 = 0.78-0.91, NSE = 0.67-0.82),特别是在5%和15%坡度的情况下。这些发现为侵蚀动力学提供了有价值的见解,并有助于改善土壤管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Laboratory Insights Into the Correlation Between Sediment Yield, Soil Electrical Conductivity and pH in Surface and Piping Erosion

Laboratory Insights Into the Correlation Between Sediment Yield, Soil Electrical Conductivity and pH in Surface and Piping Erosion

Soil erosion, driven by factors such as water, wind, tillage and so forth, has significant impacts on both humanity and the environment. Soil erosion, including surface and subsurface (piping) erosion, significantly affects the environment and infrastructure. This research examines the impact of soil properties, that is, electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, on sediment yield in both surface and piping erosion. Rigorous laboratory experiments were conducted on slopes of 5%, 10% and 15%, using a soil profile that consisted of a 5 cm water-restrictive layer of clay loam and a 15 cm topsoil layer of loam. Three experimental configurations were devised: exclusive pipe flow at 27 L h−1 (M1), rainfall intensity at 30 mm h−1 (M2), and a composite scenario integrating both rainfall and pipe flow (M3), with each configuration executed three times. The pipe flow was simulated using a plastic tube with a 1 cm diameter, placed on top of the water-restrictive layer, which helped create conditions for subsurface flow. Results showed that sediment yield predictions varied with slope. For surface erosion, the most favourable performance was observed at 5% slope with pipe flow (R2 = 0.76, NSE = 0.76), while combined scenarios performed adequately (R2 = 0.71). At 10% slope, performance was good (R2 = 0.66, NSE = 0.65), and at 15%, results ranged from acceptable to very good. In piping erosion, the combined scenario consistently performed best (R2 = 0.78–0.91, NSE = 0.67–0.82), particularly at 5% and 15% slopes. These findings offer valuable insights into erosion dynamics and can help improve soil management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信