废水中SARS-CoV-2的检测新技术

IF 2 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nolwazi T. Gazu, Aoife Morrin, Xolile Fuku, Prof. Bhekie B. Mamba, Usisipho Feleni
{"title":"废水中SARS-CoV-2的检测新技术","authors":"Nolwazi T. Gazu,&nbsp;Aoife Morrin,&nbsp;Xolile Fuku,&nbsp;Prof. Bhekie B. Mamba,&nbsp;Usisipho Feleni","doi":"10.1002/slct.202404698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak raised major concerns in public health globally, raising the crucial need for the development of methods to monitor the spread of COVID-19 in communities worldwide. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) surveillance has been used as a novel tool to monitor outbreaks in communities because of its affordability and efficiency in tracking infectious contaminants. Unlike other means of public health tracking, wastewater is independent of individuals having accessibility to healthcare, doctor visits, or infection testing availability. Consequently, raising considerable awareness and complete tracking of infections, including COVID-19 at a community level. In WBE studies, polymerase chain reaction-based (PCR) techniques are referred to as the “gold-standard” method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in many countries. Nevertheless, despite the extensive development of sensitive and selective PCR-based methods, these techniques have shown some limitations that hinder their application, such as the requirement of repeated heating and cooling cycles and analysis time of 3–4 h. The development of alternative techniques that do not rely on the same consumables as the conventionally employed methods, such as electrochemical biosensing, for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in environmental water samples offers favorable advantages such as improved turnaround times and portability. However, the currently employed techniques are highly focused on clinical applications than wastewater. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages associated with conventional and a novel alternative: electrochemical-bioreceptor-based technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In addition, highlights the broad use of these techniques in clinical applications than WBE, the binding affinity of the various bioreceptors toward SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins, and their use in enhancing the analytical properties of electrochemical biosensors and the integration of electrochemical biosensors with conventional techniques. The integrated systems, especially, electrochemical-CRISPR based, have shown high sensitivities (down to concentrations of atto-molar), with potential application in low-resource areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":146,"journal":{"name":"ChemistrySelect","volume":"10 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/slct.202404698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Technologies for the Determination of SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater\",\"authors\":\"Nolwazi T. Gazu,&nbsp;Aoife Morrin,&nbsp;Xolile Fuku,&nbsp;Prof. Bhekie B. Mamba,&nbsp;Usisipho Feleni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/slct.202404698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak raised major concerns in public health globally, raising the crucial need for the development of methods to monitor the spread of COVID-19 in communities worldwide. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) surveillance has been used as a novel tool to monitor outbreaks in communities because of its affordability and efficiency in tracking infectious contaminants. Unlike other means of public health tracking, wastewater is independent of individuals having accessibility to healthcare, doctor visits, or infection testing availability. Consequently, raising considerable awareness and complete tracking of infections, including COVID-19 at a community level. In WBE studies, polymerase chain reaction-based (PCR) techniques are referred to as the “gold-standard” method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in many countries. Nevertheless, despite the extensive development of sensitive and selective PCR-based methods, these techniques have shown some limitations that hinder their application, such as the requirement of repeated heating and cooling cycles and analysis time of 3–4 h. The development of alternative techniques that do not rely on the same consumables as the conventionally employed methods, such as electrochemical biosensing, for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in environmental water samples offers favorable advantages such as improved turnaround times and portability. However, the currently employed techniques are highly focused on clinical applications than wastewater. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages associated with conventional and a novel alternative: electrochemical-bioreceptor-based technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In addition, highlights the broad use of these techniques in clinical applications than WBE, the binding affinity of the various bioreceptors toward SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins, and their use in enhancing the analytical properties of electrochemical biosensors and the integration of electrochemical biosensors with conventional techniques. The integrated systems, especially, electrochemical-CRISPR based, have shown high sensitivities (down to concentrations of atto-molar), with potential application in low-resource areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"volume\":\"10 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/slct.202404698\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202404698\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemistrySelect","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202404698","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行疫情引发了全球公共卫生领域的重大关切,迫切需要制定监测COVID-19在全球社区传播的方法。基于废水的流行病学监测已被用作监测社区暴发的一种新工具,因为它在跟踪传染性污染物方面价格合理且效率高。与其他公共卫生跟踪手段不同,废水与个人是否能够获得医疗保健、看医生或进行感染检测无关。因此,在社区一级提高对感染的认识并完成对感染的跟踪,包括COVID-19。在WBE研究中,基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的技术在许多国家被称为检测SARS-CoV-2的“金标准”方法。然而,尽管基于敏感和选择性pcr的方法得到了广泛的发展,但这些技术已经显示出一些限制,阻碍了它们的应用,例如需要反复加热和冷却循环以及3-4小时的分析时间。替代技术的发展不依赖于与传统方法相同的耗材,如电化学生物传感,用于检测环境水样中的SARS-CoV-2具有诸如缩短周转时间和便携性等有利优势。然而,目前使用的技术主要集中在临床应用而不是废水处理。本文综述了基于电化学-生物受体的检测SARS-CoV-2的传统和新型替代技术的优缺点。此外,强调了这些技术在临床应用中的广泛应用,以及各种生物受体对SARS-CoV-2病毒蛋白的结合亲和力,以及它们在提高电化学生物传感器分析性能和电化学生物传感器与传统技术集成方面的应用。集成系统,特别是基于电化学- crispr的系统,已经显示出高灵敏度(低至atto-molar浓度),在资源匮乏地区具有潜在的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recent Technologies for the Determination of SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater

Recent Technologies for the Determination of SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater

The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak raised major concerns in public health globally, raising the crucial need for the development of methods to monitor the spread of COVID-19 in communities worldwide. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) surveillance has been used as a novel tool to monitor outbreaks in communities because of its affordability and efficiency in tracking infectious contaminants. Unlike other means of public health tracking, wastewater is independent of individuals having accessibility to healthcare, doctor visits, or infection testing availability. Consequently, raising considerable awareness and complete tracking of infections, including COVID-19 at a community level. In WBE studies, polymerase chain reaction-based (PCR) techniques are referred to as the “gold-standard” method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in many countries. Nevertheless, despite the extensive development of sensitive and selective PCR-based methods, these techniques have shown some limitations that hinder their application, such as the requirement of repeated heating and cooling cycles and analysis time of 3–4 h. The development of alternative techniques that do not rely on the same consumables as the conventionally employed methods, such as electrochemical biosensing, for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in environmental water samples offers favorable advantages such as improved turnaround times and portability. However, the currently employed techniques are highly focused on clinical applications than wastewater. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages associated with conventional and a novel alternative: electrochemical-bioreceptor-based technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In addition, highlights the broad use of these techniques in clinical applications than WBE, the binding affinity of the various bioreceptors toward SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins, and their use in enhancing the analytical properties of electrochemical biosensors and the integration of electrochemical biosensors with conventional techniques. The integrated systems, especially, electrochemical-CRISPR based, have shown high sensitivities (down to concentrations of atto-molar), with potential application in low-resource areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ChemistrySelect
ChemistrySelect Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1809
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: ChemistrySelect is the latest journal from ChemPubSoc Europe and Wiley-VCH. It offers researchers a quality society-owned journal in which to publish their work in all areas of chemistry. Manuscripts are evaluated by active researchers to ensure they add meaningfully to the scientific literature, and those accepted are processed quickly to ensure rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信