策略性的绿色屋顶安置在多伦多,以最大限度地提高效益,同时结合市民的喜好

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Matthew Jung , Sharlene L. Gomes , Roy P. Remme
{"title":"策略性的绿色屋顶安置在多伦多,以最大限度地提高效益,同时结合市民的喜好","authors":"Matthew Jung ,&nbsp;Sharlene L. Gomes ,&nbsp;Roy P. Remme","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green roofs provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including air quality regulation, temperature regulation, flood regulation, and habitat provision. Through strategic placement they can address multiple urban challenges. However, city governments often do not engage in strategic spatial and fail to consider citizen preferences. To address this, we developed an approach for strategic placement of green roofs, based on the four mentioned ecosystem services for Toronto, Canada. We designed an approach based on biophysical information, which we further enriched with data on citizen preferences for different ecosystem services. We used literature-derived criteria and spatial analysis to identify optimal green roof placement locations for each ecosystem service separately, and the four services combined. A citizen survey was conducted (n = 402) to rank ecosystem services based on preferences. Mean rankings were used for a citizen-weighted model for strategic green roof placements. Our approach identified key priority areas for Toronto, while also highlighting that a significant portion of the city’s rooftops are sub-optimal for maximizing the benefits of all four ecosystem. However, by focusing on turning roofs in hotspot areas (0.2–1.2 % of total roof space) into green roofs, the four ecosystem services could be enhanced simultaneously. Results showed large spatial variations in priority areas between individual ecosystem services. However, comparing results across the biophysical and citizen weighted approach for all ecosystem services combined indicated similar priority areas, suggesting citizen support for prioritisation related to biophysical needs. Moreover, citizen involvement in governance practices can foster transparency, inclusivity, and satisfaction in strategic planning of green roofs. The methods employed in this study can be adapted to other cities worldwide, enabling more strategic, participatory approaches to implementing green roofs to enhance multiple ecosystem services where they are valued most.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128798"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic green roof placement in Toronto to maximize benefits while incorporating citizen preferences\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Jung ,&nbsp;Sharlene L. Gomes ,&nbsp;Roy P. Remme\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green roofs provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including air quality regulation, temperature regulation, flood regulation, and habitat provision. Through strategic placement they can address multiple urban challenges. However, city governments often do not engage in strategic spatial and fail to consider citizen preferences. To address this, we developed an approach for strategic placement of green roofs, based on the four mentioned ecosystem services for Toronto, Canada. We designed an approach based on biophysical information, which we further enriched with data on citizen preferences for different ecosystem services. We used literature-derived criteria and spatial analysis to identify optimal green roof placement locations for each ecosystem service separately, and the four services combined. A citizen survey was conducted (n = 402) to rank ecosystem services based on preferences. Mean rankings were used for a citizen-weighted model for strategic green roof placements. Our approach identified key priority areas for Toronto, while also highlighting that a significant portion of the city’s rooftops are sub-optimal for maximizing the benefits of all four ecosystem. However, by focusing on turning roofs in hotspot areas (0.2–1.2 % of total roof space) into green roofs, the four ecosystem services could be enhanced simultaneously. Results showed large spatial variations in priority areas between individual ecosystem services. However, comparing results across the biophysical and citizen weighted approach for all ecosystem services combined indicated similar priority areas, suggesting citizen support for prioritisation related to biophysical needs. Moreover, citizen involvement in governance practices can foster transparency, inclusivity, and satisfaction in strategic planning of green roofs. The methods employed in this study can be adapted to other cities worldwide, enabling more strategic, participatory approaches to implementing green roofs to enhance multiple ecosystem services where they are valued most.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色屋顶提供了广泛的生态系统服务,包括空气质量调节、温度调节、洪水调节和栖息地提供。通过战略性布局,他们可以应对多种城市挑战。然而,城市政府往往不参与战略空间,也不考虑公民的偏好。为了解决这个问题,我们基于加拿大多伦多的四个生态系统服务,开发了一种绿色屋顶的战略布局方法。我们设计了一种基于生物物理信息的方法,并进一步丰富了公民对不同生态系统服务的偏好数据。我们使用文献衍生的标准和空间分析来分别确定每种生态系统服务的最佳绿色屋顶放置位置,并将四种服务组合在一起。进行了一项公民调查(n = 402),根据偏好对生态系统服务进行排名。平均排名用于战略绿色屋顶安置的公民加权模型。我们的方法确定了多伦多的关键优先领域,同时也强调了城市屋顶的很大一部分是次优的,无法最大化所有四个生态系统的利益。然而,通过重点将热点区域的屋顶(占屋顶总空间的0.2-1.2 %)转变为绿色屋顶,可以同时增强四种生态系统服务。结果表明,各生态系统服务功能优先区域存在较大空间差异。然而,比较所有生态系统服务的生物物理和公民加权方法的结果显示出相似的优先领域,这表明公民支持与生物物理需求相关的优先领域。此外,公民参与治理实践可以促进绿色屋顶战略规划的透明度、包容性和满意度。本研究中采用的方法可以适用于全球其他城市,使实施绿色屋顶的方法更具战略性和参与性,从而在最受重视的地方增强多种生态系统服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic green roof placement in Toronto to maximize benefits while incorporating citizen preferences
Green roofs provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including air quality regulation, temperature regulation, flood regulation, and habitat provision. Through strategic placement they can address multiple urban challenges. However, city governments often do not engage in strategic spatial and fail to consider citizen preferences. To address this, we developed an approach for strategic placement of green roofs, based on the four mentioned ecosystem services for Toronto, Canada. We designed an approach based on biophysical information, which we further enriched with data on citizen preferences for different ecosystem services. We used literature-derived criteria and spatial analysis to identify optimal green roof placement locations for each ecosystem service separately, and the four services combined. A citizen survey was conducted (n = 402) to rank ecosystem services based on preferences. Mean rankings were used for a citizen-weighted model for strategic green roof placements. Our approach identified key priority areas for Toronto, while also highlighting that a significant portion of the city’s rooftops are sub-optimal for maximizing the benefits of all four ecosystem. However, by focusing on turning roofs in hotspot areas (0.2–1.2 % of total roof space) into green roofs, the four ecosystem services could be enhanced simultaneously. Results showed large spatial variations in priority areas between individual ecosystem services. However, comparing results across the biophysical and citizen weighted approach for all ecosystem services combined indicated similar priority areas, suggesting citizen support for prioritisation related to biophysical needs. Moreover, citizen involvement in governance practices can foster transparency, inclusivity, and satisfaction in strategic planning of green roofs. The methods employed in this study can be adapted to other cities worldwide, enabling more strategic, participatory approaches to implementing green roofs to enhance multiple ecosystem services where they are valued most.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信