优化中国山区的抗洪能力:利用先进的机器学习技术设计洪水估算

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Xuemei Wang , Ronghua Liu , Chaoxing Sun , Xiaoyan Zhai , Liuqian Ding , Xiao Liu , Xiaolei Zhang
{"title":"优化中国山区的抗洪能力:利用先进的机器学习技术设计洪水估算","authors":"Xuemei Wang ,&nbsp;Ronghua Liu ,&nbsp;Chaoxing Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Zhai ,&nbsp;Liuqian Ding ,&nbsp;Xiao Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaolei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>China</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>We developed machine learning (ML) models for design flood estimation in mountainous catchments (≤ 500 km²) across China. This process considered different ML algorithms (random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector regression), model scopes (nation and hydrological zones), and feature input sets (1–14 features) to optimize model development strategies.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights for the region</h3><div>Based on estimation performance and hyperparameter tuning efficiency, random forest was found to be the optimal algorithm. The optimal model scope resulted in five distinct models: a single lumped model encompassing six eastern zones and four separate zonal models for the western zones. Considering both accuracy and efficiency, the optimal number of input features ranged from 5 to 14 for different models. High estimation accuracy was observed in the Qinba-Dabie North, Southeast, Southwest, and Yunnan-Tibet Zone, with average <em>RMSE</em>, <em>R</em>², <em>MQE</em>, and <em>QR</em> ranging from 55.90 to 103.97, 0.83–0.93, 45.62–65.77 %, and 55.90–60.98 %, respectively, for the test set across different return periods. The remaining zones exhibited moderate accuracy, with the Northwest Basin Zone demonstrating particularly low accuracy due to fewer catchments. Notably, catchments with areas &gt; 100 km² demonstrated higher estimation accuracy, with an average 60 % reduction in <em>MQE</em> and a 30 % increase in <em>QR</em> compared to catchments of all sizes. This study provides crucial reference and data support for national flash flood prevention efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102345"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing flood resilience in China’s mountainous areas: Design flood estimation using advanced machine learning techniques\",\"authors\":\"Xuemei Wang ,&nbsp;Ronghua Liu ,&nbsp;Chaoxing Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Zhai ,&nbsp;Liuqian Ding ,&nbsp;Xiao Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaolei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>China</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>We developed machine learning (ML) models for design flood estimation in mountainous catchments (≤ 500 km²) across China. This process considered different ML algorithms (random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector regression), model scopes (nation and hydrological zones), and feature input sets (1–14 features) to optimize model development strategies.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights for the region</h3><div>Based on estimation performance and hyperparameter tuning efficiency, random forest was found to be the optimal algorithm. The optimal model scope resulted in five distinct models: a single lumped model encompassing six eastern zones and four separate zonal models for the western zones. Considering both accuracy and efficiency, the optimal number of input features ranged from 5 to 14 for different models. High estimation accuracy was observed in the Qinba-Dabie North, Southeast, Southwest, and Yunnan-Tibet Zone, with average <em>RMSE</em>, <em>R</em>², <em>MQE</em>, and <em>QR</em> ranging from 55.90 to 103.97, 0.83–0.93, 45.62–65.77 %, and 55.90–60.98 %, respectively, for the test set across different return periods. The remaining zones exhibited moderate accuracy, with the Northwest Basin Zone demonstrating particularly low accuracy due to fewer catchments. Notably, catchments with areas &gt; 100 km² demonstrated higher estimation accuracy, with an average 60 % reduction in <em>MQE</em> and a 30 % increase in <em>QR</em> compared to catchments of all sizes. This study provides crucial reference and data support for national flash flood prevention efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825001703\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825001703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发了机器学习(ML)模型,用于估计中国各地山区集水区(≤500 km²)的设计洪水。该过程考虑了不同的ML算法(随机森林、极端梯度增强和支持向量回归)、模型范围(国家和水文带)和特征输入集(1-14个特征)来优化模型开发策略。基于估计性能和超参数调整效率,发现随机森林算法是最优算法。最优的模型范围产生了五个不同的模型:一个包含六个东部区域的单一集总模型和四个独立的西部区域模型。考虑到准确率和效率,对于不同的模型,最优的输入特征个数在5 ~ 14之间。在秦巴-大别北部、东南、西南和云藏地区,各回归期的平均RMSE、R²、MQE和QR值分别为55.90 ~ 103.97、0.83 ~ 0.93、45.62 ~ 65.77 %和55.90 ~ 60.98 %,估计精度较高。其余区域精度中等,西北盆地区域由于集水区较少,精度特别低。值得注意的是,与所有规模的集水区相比,面积为>; 100 km²的集水区显示出更高的估计精度,MQE平均减少60 %,QR平均增加30 %。本研究为国家防汛减灾工作提供了重要的参考和数据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing flood resilience in China’s mountainous areas: Design flood estimation using advanced machine learning techniques

Study region

China

Study focus

We developed machine learning (ML) models for design flood estimation in mountainous catchments (≤ 500 km²) across China. This process considered different ML algorithms (random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector regression), model scopes (nation and hydrological zones), and feature input sets (1–14 features) to optimize model development strategies.

New hydrological insights for the region

Based on estimation performance and hyperparameter tuning efficiency, random forest was found to be the optimal algorithm. The optimal model scope resulted in five distinct models: a single lumped model encompassing six eastern zones and four separate zonal models for the western zones. Considering both accuracy and efficiency, the optimal number of input features ranged from 5 to 14 for different models. High estimation accuracy was observed in the Qinba-Dabie North, Southeast, Southwest, and Yunnan-Tibet Zone, with average RMSE, R², MQE, and QR ranging from 55.90 to 103.97, 0.83–0.93, 45.62–65.77 %, and 55.90–60.98 %, respectively, for the test set across different return periods. The remaining zones exhibited moderate accuracy, with the Northwest Basin Zone demonstrating particularly low accuracy due to fewer catchments. Notably, catchments with areas > 100 km² demonstrated higher estimation accuracy, with an average 60 % reduction in MQE and a 30 % increase in QR compared to catchments of all sizes. This study provides crucial reference and data support for national flash flood prevention efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信