健康的竞争?坦桑尼亚向标准化病人提供的市场结构和临床护理质量

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Timothy Powell-Jackson , Jessica J.C. King , Christina Makungu , Catherine Goodman
{"title":"健康的竞争?坦桑尼亚向标准化病人提供的市场结构和临床护理质量","authors":"Timothy Powell-Jackson ,&nbsp;Jessica J.C. King ,&nbsp;Christina Makungu ,&nbsp;Catherine Goodman","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The private health care sector in many low- and middle-income countries is rapidly expanding. Private sector advocates have long argued that market competition drives private providers to become more efficient and responsive to patients but empirical studies are limited to mostly high-income settings. We examine whether the number of competing health facilities in close proximity is associated with quality and prices, in a sample of 228 private for-profit and faith-based facilities in Tanzania. Primary data collection took place in the health facilities between February and June 2018. By exploiting data on the quality of clinical care given to unannounced standardised patients, we are able to compare quality across providers without confounding due to patient characteristics. We find that more local competition is associated with poorer clinical quality. The former is driven by an increase in unnecessary care rather than a reduction in appropriate care. Policymakers in such settings should be cautious in assuming that market competition will drive up quality of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 118008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthy competition? Market structure and the quality of clinical care given to standardised patients in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Powell-Jackson ,&nbsp;Jessica J.C. King ,&nbsp;Christina Makungu ,&nbsp;Catherine Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The private health care sector in many low- and middle-income countries is rapidly expanding. Private sector advocates have long argued that market competition drives private providers to become more efficient and responsive to patients but empirical studies are limited to mostly high-income settings. We examine whether the number of competing health facilities in close proximity is associated with quality and prices, in a sample of 228 private for-profit and faith-based facilities in Tanzania. Primary data collection took place in the health facilities between February and June 2018. By exploiting data on the quality of clinical care given to unannounced standardised patients, we are able to compare quality across providers without confounding due to patient characteristics. We find that more local competition is associated with poorer clinical quality. The former is driven by an increase in unnecessary care rather than a reduction in appropriate care. Policymakers in such settings should be cautious in assuming that market competition will drive up quality of care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"373 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多低收入和中等收入国家的私营保健部门正在迅速扩大。私营部门的倡导者长期以来一直认为,市场竞争促使私营医疗机构变得更有效率,对患者的反应更积极,但实证研究大多局限于高收入环境。我们以坦桑尼亚228家私营营利性和宗教机构为样本,研究了附近竞争卫生机构的数量是否与质量和价格有关。2018年2月至6月期间在卫生设施进行了初步数据收集。通过利用未经通知的标准化患者的临床护理质量数据,我们能够比较不同提供者的质量,而不会因患者特征而混淆。我们发现,更多的地方竞争与较差的临床质量有关。前者是由于不必要护理的增加而不是适当护理的减少造成的。在这种情况下,政策制定者应该谨慎地假设市场竞争将提高医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthy competition? Market structure and the quality of clinical care given to standardised patients in Tanzania
The private health care sector in many low- and middle-income countries is rapidly expanding. Private sector advocates have long argued that market competition drives private providers to become more efficient and responsive to patients but empirical studies are limited to mostly high-income settings. We examine whether the number of competing health facilities in close proximity is associated with quality and prices, in a sample of 228 private for-profit and faith-based facilities in Tanzania. Primary data collection took place in the health facilities between February and June 2018. By exploiting data on the quality of clinical care given to unannounced standardised patients, we are able to compare quality across providers without confounding due to patient characteristics. We find that more local competition is associated with poorer clinical quality. The former is driven by an increase in unnecessary care rather than a reduction in appropriate care. Policymakers in such settings should be cautious in assuming that market competition will drive up quality of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信