服务自由化如何塑造发展中国家的职能专业化?

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Feifei Wu , Lei Liu , Bo Gao , Yanrui Wu
{"title":"服务自由化如何塑造发展中国家的职能专业化?","authors":"Feifei Wu ,&nbsp;Lei Liu ,&nbsp;Bo Gao ,&nbsp;Yanrui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How does services liberalization in developing countries shape their functional specialization, i.e. does it cause relatively more domestic value added in exports attributed to fabrication (and to R&amp;D)? This paper empirically shows that services liberalization primarily reinforces specialization in fabrication. We find that the mechanism is the reduction in the cost of services used as the input of manufacturing sectors after services liberalization. We also document the impact is mainly driven by services liberalization in sectors of business and telecommunication and more prominent in sectors characterized by low labor cost, low labor productivity, and low technology levels and in developing countries located in the European production network. Moreover, we show that services liberalization has no discernible impact on specialization in R&amp;D within developing countries. Our results suggest that developing countries, opening up their domestic services market, are seemingly incapable of upgrading functional specialization towards R&amp;D from fabrication, but become more deeply entrenched in fabrication within the global production network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102398"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How services liberalization shapes functional specialization in developing countries?\",\"authors\":\"Feifei Wu ,&nbsp;Lei Liu ,&nbsp;Bo Gao ,&nbsp;Yanrui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How does services liberalization in developing countries shape their functional specialization, i.e. does it cause relatively more domestic value added in exports attributed to fabrication (and to R&amp;D)? This paper empirically shows that services liberalization primarily reinforces specialization in fabrication. We find that the mechanism is the reduction in the cost of services used as the input of manufacturing sectors after services liberalization. We also document the impact is mainly driven by services liberalization in sectors of business and telecommunication and more prominent in sectors characterized by low labor cost, low labor productivity, and low technology levels and in developing countries located in the European production network. Moreover, we show that services liberalization has no discernible impact on specialization in R&amp;D within developing countries. Our results suggest that developing countries, opening up their domestic services market, are seemingly incapable of upgrading functional specialization towards R&amp;D from fabrication, but become more deeply entrenched in fabrication within the global production network.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000562\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展中国家的服务自由化是如何塑造其职能专业化的,也就是说,它是否导致相对更多的国内附加值的出口归因于制造(和研发)?实证研究表明,服务业自由化主要强化了制造业的专业化。我们发现其机制是服务业自由化后制造业投入的服务成本降低。我们还证明,这种影响主要是由商业和电信部门的服务自由化驱动的,在劳动力成本低、劳动生产率低、技术水平低的部门和位于欧洲生产网络的发展中国家更为突出。此外,我们表明,服务自由化对发展中国家的研发专业化没有明显的影响。我们的研究结果表明,开放国内服务市场的发展中国家似乎无法将职能专业化从制造向研发升级,而是在全球生产网络中的制造中变得更加根深蒂固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How services liberalization shapes functional specialization in developing countries?
How does services liberalization in developing countries shape their functional specialization, i.e. does it cause relatively more domestic value added in exports attributed to fabrication (and to R&D)? This paper empirically shows that services liberalization primarily reinforces specialization in fabrication. We find that the mechanism is the reduction in the cost of services used as the input of manufacturing sectors after services liberalization. We also document the impact is mainly driven by services liberalization in sectors of business and telecommunication and more prominent in sectors characterized by low labor cost, low labor productivity, and low technology levels and in developing countries located in the European production network. Moreover, we show that services liberalization has no discernible impact on specialization in R&D within developing countries. Our results suggest that developing countries, opening up their domestic services market, are seemingly incapable of upgrading functional specialization towards R&D from fabrication, but become more deeply entrenched in fabrication within the global production network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信