干旱区内陆河流域生态承载力评价的卫生服务风险框架——以塔里木河流域为例

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rongqin Yang, Zhenxia Mu, Zilong Li, Xiaoyan Qiu, Jing Liu
{"title":"干旱区内陆河流域生态承载力评价的卫生服务风险框架——以塔里木河流域为例","authors":"Rongqin Yang,&nbsp;Zhenxia Mu,&nbsp;Zilong Li,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Qiu,&nbsp;Jing Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) serves as a crucial indicator for evaluating the potential of regional ecosystems and informing sustainable development strategies. However, existing research on arid inland river basins often lacks a comprehensive and integrated assessment framework. Therefore, this study proposes a novel ECC evaluation framework based on ecosystem sustainability, incorporating ecosystem health (EH), ecosystem service (ES), and ecological risk (ER). Using the Tarim River Basin (TRB) as a case study, the ecological environmental quality index (EEQI) was introduced to validate the reliability of the assessment results, while spatial correlation analysis was employed to confirm the necessity of the framework. The independent and joint effects of the drivers on ECC were analyzed using the optimal-parameter Geodetector model. The results showed that spatial clustering characteristics such as “low carrying-high health” and “low carrying-high service” exist in the TRB. Healthy ecosystems and those providing multiple services are not necessarily capable of carrying, highlighting the need for a comprehensive evaluation of ECC that combines EH, ES, and ER. The ECC evaluation, based on the “health-service-risk” framework, was significantly correlated with the EEQI (correlation coefficient = 0.694–0.770, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), indicating that the evaluation results were reliable and accurately reflected the actual status of ECC in the TRB. The overall ECC of the TRB is minimal, with regions of low and medium carrying capacity constituting over 76.83 % of the total area. The ECC condition of the TRB gradually improved from 2000 to 2020, with areas of increased carrying capacity averaging about 16.79 % of the total area in each period. The improvements were most evident in mountainous regions. The joint effects of several factors significantly affect ECC more than the independent effects of individual components. Notably, land use intensity and landscape factors increasingly influence ECC status. This study not only provides a valuable reference for the ecological conservation, restoration, and sustainable regional development of the TRB, but also offers a robust framework for ECC assessment in other arid inland river basins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113427"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A health-service-risk framework for evaluating ecological carrying capacity in arid inland river basins: A case study of the Tarim River Basin\",\"authors\":\"Rongqin Yang,&nbsp;Zhenxia Mu,&nbsp;Zilong Li,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Qiu,&nbsp;Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) serves as a crucial indicator for evaluating the potential of regional ecosystems and informing sustainable development strategies. However, existing research on arid inland river basins often lacks a comprehensive and integrated assessment framework. Therefore, this study proposes a novel ECC evaluation framework based on ecosystem sustainability, incorporating ecosystem health (EH), ecosystem service (ES), and ecological risk (ER). Using the Tarim River Basin (TRB) as a case study, the ecological environmental quality index (EEQI) was introduced to validate the reliability of the assessment results, while spatial correlation analysis was employed to confirm the necessity of the framework. The independent and joint effects of the drivers on ECC were analyzed using the optimal-parameter Geodetector model. The results showed that spatial clustering characteristics such as “low carrying-high health” and “low carrying-high service” exist in the TRB. Healthy ecosystems and those providing multiple services are not necessarily capable of carrying, highlighting the need for a comprehensive evaluation of ECC that combines EH, ES, and ER. The ECC evaluation, based on the “health-service-risk” framework, was significantly correlated with the EEQI (correlation coefficient = 0.694–0.770, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), indicating that the evaluation results were reliable and accurately reflected the actual status of ECC in the TRB. The overall ECC of the TRB is minimal, with regions of low and medium carrying capacity constituting over 76.83 % of the total area. The ECC condition of the TRB gradually improved from 2000 to 2020, with areas of increased carrying capacity averaging about 16.79 % of the total area in each period. The improvements were most evident in mountainous regions. The joint effects of several factors significantly affect ECC more than the independent effects of individual components. Notably, land use intensity and landscape factors increasingly influence ECC status. This study not only provides a valuable reference for the ecological conservation, restoration, and sustainable regional development of the TRB, but also offers a robust framework for ECC assessment in other arid inland river basins.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003577\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态承载力是评价区域生态系统潜力和指导可持续发展战略的重要指标。然而,现有的干旱区内陆河流域研究往往缺乏一个全面、综合的评价框架。因此,本研究提出了一个基于生态系统可持续性的生态系统健康(EH)、生态系统服务(ES)和生态风险(ER)的生态环境承载力评价框架。以塔里木河流域为例,引入生态环境质量指数(EEQI)来验证评价结果的可靠性,并通过空间相关性分析来验证框架的必要性。利用最优参数地质探测器模型分析了驱动因素对ECC的独立和共同影响。结果表明:三峡库区存在“低携带-高健康”和“低携带-高服务”的空间聚类特征;健康的生态系统和提供多种服务的生态系统不一定具有承载能力,因此需要综合评价生态环境、生态环境和生态环境。基于“卫生服务风险”框架的ECC评价与EEQI显著相关(相关系数= 0.694-0.770,p <;0.05),说明评价结果可靠,准确反映了TRB内ECC的实际状态。三峡库区的整体生态承载力最小,低、中承载力区域占总面积的76.83%以上。2000 - 2020年,三峡库区ECC条件逐步改善,各时期承载力增加面积平均约占总面积的16.79%。这种改善在山区最为明显。多个因素的共同作用比单个因素的独立作用更显著地影响ECC。值得注意的是,土地利用强度和景观因素对ECC状态的影响越来越大。该研究不仅为三峡库区的生态保护、恢复和区域可持续发展提供了有价值的参考,也为其他干旱内陆河流域的生态环境保护评价提供了有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A health-service-risk framework for evaluating ecological carrying capacity in arid inland river basins: A case study of the Tarim River Basin
Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) serves as a crucial indicator for evaluating the potential of regional ecosystems and informing sustainable development strategies. However, existing research on arid inland river basins often lacks a comprehensive and integrated assessment framework. Therefore, this study proposes a novel ECC evaluation framework based on ecosystem sustainability, incorporating ecosystem health (EH), ecosystem service (ES), and ecological risk (ER). Using the Tarim River Basin (TRB) as a case study, the ecological environmental quality index (EEQI) was introduced to validate the reliability of the assessment results, while spatial correlation analysis was employed to confirm the necessity of the framework. The independent and joint effects of the drivers on ECC were analyzed using the optimal-parameter Geodetector model. The results showed that spatial clustering characteristics such as “low carrying-high health” and “low carrying-high service” exist in the TRB. Healthy ecosystems and those providing multiple services are not necessarily capable of carrying, highlighting the need for a comprehensive evaluation of ECC that combines EH, ES, and ER. The ECC evaluation, based on the “health-service-risk” framework, was significantly correlated with the EEQI (correlation coefficient = 0.694–0.770, p < 0.05), indicating that the evaluation results were reliable and accurately reflected the actual status of ECC in the TRB. The overall ECC of the TRB is minimal, with regions of low and medium carrying capacity constituting over 76.83 % of the total area. The ECC condition of the TRB gradually improved from 2000 to 2020, with areas of increased carrying capacity averaging about 16.79 % of the total area in each period. The improvements were most evident in mountainous regions. The joint effects of several factors significantly affect ECC more than the independent effects of individual components. Notably, land use intensity and landscape factors increasingly influence ECC status. This study not only provides a valuable reference for the ecological conservation, restoration, and sustainable regional development of the TRB, but also offers a robust framework for ECC assessment in other arid inland river basins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信