Jizhou Bai , Jing Li , Zixiang Zhou , Hui Dang , Ya Zhang , Chuhan Wang , Yijie Sun
{"title":"土壤保持服务的实际供给限制了它们的利用:从生态系统服务流的角度","authors":"Jizhou Bai , Jing Li , Zixiang Zhou , Hui Dang , Ya Zhang , Chuhan Wang , Yijie Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil conservation services (SCS) represent a vital subset of ecosystem regulating services, playing a critical role in mitigating regional land degradation and reducing flood disaster risks, a subject that has garnered considerable scholarly attention. Nevertheless, a significant mismatch persists between SCS supply and demand, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of how SCS flows operate from supply areas to demand areas. Despite its importance, research on the dynamics of SCS flows remains underdeveloped, limiting its ability to provide robust support for informed and nuanced decision-making in sustainable ecosystem management. To address this research gap, this study conducted an investigation in the Jinghe River Basin (JRB), utilizing SWAT and GIS technologies to reproduce the spatiotemporal patterns of SCS. Additionally, this study quantitatively assessed and mapped the sediment reduction service flow volumes and pathways at four different spatial scales, aiming to elucidate the spatial transfer mechanisms of SCS flow within the JRB. Finally, based on the supply–demand-flow-use (SDFU) framework, this study quantifies the actual use of SCS flow by calculating its actual supply and potential demand, with a focus on analyzing the limitations to its actual use. The findings of this research yield several critical insights: (1) The spatial distribution patterns of high and low values in SCS supply and demand within the JRB exhibited significant congruence, while both components manifested a consistent temporal trajectory characterized by rapid initial escalation followed by subsequent stabilization. (2) The transport of SCS, facilitated by sediments in the water column, undergoes spatial displacement through slopes, rivers, and subbasins within the watershed network, with the flow volume of sediment reduction services reaching its nadir in 2000, increasing significantly in 2010, and slightly declining in 2020. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the actual use of SCS followed a similar trend to SCS flow, with the demand satisfaction rate steadily increasing (0.22, 0.34, 0.77), indicating that while the actual supply of SCS is meeting more demand, it still fails to fully satisfy the actual use. In summary, the attempt of this study not only enriches the research field of ecosystem service flow but also promises to provide theoretical guidance for the scientific management of land resources and sustainable regional development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113420"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual supply of soil conservation services limits their use: From an ecosystem service flow perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jizhou Bai , Jing Li , Zixiang Zhou , Hui Dang , Ya Zhang , Chuhan Wang , Yijie Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil conservation services (SCS) represent a vital subset of ecosystem regulating services, playing a critical role in mitigating regional land degradation and reducing flood disaster risks, a subject that has garnered considerable scholarly attention. Nevertheless, a significant mismatch persists between SCS supply and demand, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of how SCS flows operate from supply areas to demand areas. Despite its importance, research on the dynamics of SCS flows remains underdeveloped, limiting its ability to provide robust support for informed and nuanced decision-making in sustainable ecosystem management. To address this research gap, this study conducted an investigation in the Jinghe River Basin (JRB), utilizing SWAT and GIS technologies to reproduce the spatiotemporal patterns of SCS. Additionally, this study quantitatively assessed and mapped the sediment reduction service flow volumes and pathways at four different spatial scales, aiming to elucidate the spatial transfer mechanisms of SCS flow within the JRB. Finally, based on the supply–demand-flow-use (SDFU) framework, this study quantifies the actual use of SCS flow by calculating its actual supply and potential demand, with a focus on analyzing the limitations to its actual use. The findings of this research yield several critical insights: (1) The spatial distribution patterns of high and low values in SCS supply and demand within the JRB exhibited significant congruence, while both components manifested a consistent temporal trajectory characterized by rapid initial escalation followed by subsequent stabilization. (2) The transport of SCS, facilitated by sediments in the water column, undergoes spatial displacement through slopes, rivers, and subbasins within the watershed network, with the flow volume of sediment reduction services reaching its nadir in 2000, increasing significantly in 2010, and slightly declining in 2020. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the actual use of SCS followed a similar trend to SCS flow, with the demand satisfaction rate steadily increasing (0.22, 0.34, 0.77), indicating that while the actual supply of SCS is meeting more demand, it still fails to fully satisfy the actual use. In summary, the attempt of this study not only enriches the research field of ecosystem service flow but also promises to provide theoretical guidance for the scientific management of land resources and sustainable regional development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Actual supply of soil conservation services limits their use: From an ecosystem service flow perspective
Soil conservation services (SCS) represent a vital subset of ecosystem regulating services, playing a critical role in mitigating regional land degradation and reducing flood disaster risks, a subject that has garnered considerable scholarly attention. Nevertheless, a significant mismatch persists between SCS supply and demand, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of how SCS flows operate from supply areas to demand areas. Despite its importance, research on the dynamics of SCS flows remains underdeveloped, limiting its ability to provide robust support for informed and nuanced decision-making in sustainable ecosystem management. To address this research gap, this study conducted an investigation in the Jinghe River Basin (JRB), utilizing SWAT and GIS technologies to reproduce the spatiotemporal patterns of SCS. Additionally, this study quantitatively assessed and mapped the sediment reduction service flow volumes and pathways at four different spatial scales, aiming to elucidate the spatial transfer mechanisms of SCS flow within the JRB. Finally, based on the supply–demand-flow-use (SDFU) framework, this study quantifies the actual use of SCS flow by calculating its actual supply and potential demand, with a focus on analyzing the limitations to its actual use. The findings of this research yield several critical insights: (1) The spatial distribution patterns of high and low values in SCS supply and demand within the JRB exhibited significant congruence, while both components manifested a consistent temporal trajectory characterized by rapid initial escalation followed by subsequent stabilization. (2) The transport of SCS, facilitated by sediments in the water column, undergoes spatial displacement through slopes, rivers, and subbasins within the watershed network, with the flow volume of sediment reduction services reaching its nadir in 2000, increasing significantly in 2010, and slightly declining in 2020. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the actual use of SCS followed a similar trend to SCS flow, with the demand satisfaction rate steadily increasing (0.22, 0.34, 0.77), indicating that while the actual supply of SCS is meeting more demand, it still fails to fully satisfy the actual use. In summary, the attempt of this study not only enriches the research field of ecosystem service flow but also promises to provide theoretical guidance for the scientific management of land resources and sustainable regional development.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.