对改善痴呆症患者生活质量的药物和非药物干预措施的疗效进行系统回顾

Dominic Luxton, Naomi Thorpe, Emily Crane, Molly Warne, Olivia Cornwall, Daniel El-Dalil, Joshua Matthews, Anto P. Rajkumar
{"title":"对改善痴呆症患者生活质量的药物和非药物干预措施的疗效进行系统回顾","authors":"Dominic Luxton, Naomi Thorpe, Emily Crane, Molly Warne, Olivia Cornwall, Daniel El-Dalil, Joshua Matthews, Anto P. Rajkumar","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>People with dementia (PwD) and their carers often consider maintaining good quality of life (QoL) more important than improvements in cognition or other symptoms of dementia. There is a clinical need for identifying interventions that can improve QoL of PwD. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians, patients and policy makers to make informed decisions regarding QoL in dementia.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To conduct the first comprehensive systematic review of all studies that investigated efficacy of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for improving QoL of PwD.</p><span>Method</span><p>Our review team identified eligible studies by comprehensively searching nine databases. We completed quality assessment, extracted relevant data and performed GRADE assessment of eligible studies. We conducted meta-analyses when three or more studies investigated an intervention for improving QoL of PwD.</p><span>Results</span><p>We screened 14 389 abstracts and included 324 eligible studies. Our meta-analysis confirmed level 1 evidence supporting the use of group cognitive stimulation therapy for improving QoL (standardised mean difference 0.25; <span>P</span> = 0.003) of PwD. Our narrative data synthesis revealed level 2 evidence supporting 42 non-pharmacological interventions, including those based on cognitive rehabilitation, reminiscence, occupational therapy, robots, exercise or music therapy. Current evidence supporting the use of any pharmacological intervention for improving QoL in dementia is limited.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Current evidence highlights the importance of non-pharmacological interventions and multidisciplinary care for supporting QoL of PwD. QoL should be prioritised when agreeing care plans. Further research focusing on QoL outcomes and investigating combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving quality of life of people with dementia\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Luxton, Naomi Thorpe, Emily Crane, Molly Warne, Olivia Cornwall, Daniel El-Dalil, Joshua Matthews, Anto P. Rajkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2025.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Background</span><p>People with dementia (PwD) and their carers often consider maintaining good quality of life (QoL) more important than improvements in cognition or other symptoms of dementia. There is a clinical need for identifying interventions that can improve QoL of PwD. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians, patients and policy makers to make informed decisions regarding QoL in dementia.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To conduct the first comprehensive systematic review of all studies that investigated efficacy of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for improving QoL of PwD.</p><span>Method</span><p>Our review team identified eligible studies by comprehensively searching nine databases. We completed quality assessment, extracted relevant data and performed GRADE assessment of eligible studies. We conducted meta-analyses when three or more studies investigated an intervention for improving QoL of PwD.</p><span>Results</span><p>We screened 14 389 abstracts and included 324 eligible studies. Our meta-analysis confirmed level 1 evidence supporting the use of group cognitive stimulation therapy for improving QoL (standardised mean difference 0.25; <span>P</span> = 0.003) of PwD. Our narrative data synthesis revealed level 2 evidence supporting 42 non-pharmacological interventions, including those based on cognitive rehabilitation, reminiscence, occupational therapy, robots, exercise or music therapy. Current evidence supporting the use of any pharmacological intervention for improving QoL in dementia is limited.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Current evidence highlights the importance of non-pharmacological interventions and multidisciplinary care for supporting QoL of PwD. QoL should be prioritised when agreeing care plans. Further research focusing on QoL outcomes and investigating combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景痴呆症患者(PwD)及其护理人员通常认为保持良好的生活质量(QoL)比改善认知或其他痴呆症症状更重要。临床需要确定可以改善PwD生活质量的干预措施。目前还没有基于证据的指南来帮助临床医生、患者和政策制定者就痴呆症患者的生活质量做出明智的决定。目的对所有探讨药物或非药物干预对改善PwD生活质量的疗效的研究进行首次全面的系统评价。方法我们的评审小组通过对9个数据库进行综合检索,筛选出符合条件的研究。我们完成质量评价,提取相关数据,并对符合条件的研究进行GRADE评价。当三个或更多的研究调查了改善PwD生活质量的干预措施时,我们进行了荟萃分析。结果我们筛选了14 389篇摘要,纳入了324项符合条件的研究。我们的荟萃分析证实了一级证据支持使用群体认知刺激疗法改善生活质量(标准化平均差0.25;P = 0.003)。我们的叙事数据综合显示了支持42种非药物干预措施的2级证据,包括基于认知康复、回忆、职业治疗、机器人、运动或音乐治疗的干预措施。目前支持使用任何药物干预来改善痴呆患者生活质量的证据有限。结论目前的证据表明,非药物干预和多学科护理对支持PwD的生活质量具有重要意义。在商定护理计划时应优先考虑生活质量。迫切需要进一步研究关注生活质量的结果,并研究药物和非药物联合干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving quality of life of people with dementia
Background

People with dementia (PwD) and their carers often consider maintaining good quality of life (QoL) more important than improvements in cognition or other symptoms of dementia. There is a clinical need for identifying interventions that can improve QoL of PwD. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians, patients and policy makers to make informed decisions regarding QoL in dementia.

Aims

To conduct the first comprehensive systematic review of all studies that investigated efficacy of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for improving QoL of PwD.

Method

Our review team identified eligible studies by comprehensively searching nine databases. We completed quality assessment, extracted relevant data and performed GRADE assessment of eligible studies. We conducted meta-analyses when three or more studies investigated an intervention for improving QoL of PwD.

Results

We screened 14 389 abstracts and included 324 eligible studies. Our meta-analysis confirmed level 1 evidence supporting the use of group cognitive stimulation therapy for improving QoL (standardised mean difference 0.25; P = 0.003) of PwD. Our narrative data synthesis revealed level 2 evidence supporting 42 non-pharmacological interventions, including those based on cognitive rehabilitation, reminiscence, occupational therapy, robots, exercise or music therapy. Current evidence supporting the use of any pharmacological intervention for improving QoL in dementia is limited.

Conclusions

Current evidence highlights the importance of non-pharmacological interventions and multidisciplinary care for supporting QoL of PwD. QoL should be prioritised when agreeing care plans. Further research focusing on QoL outcomes and investigating combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信