{"title":"垄沟覆膜加生物炭提高了半干旱区玉米产量,减少了氮素损失,但增加了土壤水分消耗","authors":"Zhaoyang Li, Liangqi Ren, Hao Pan, Yanbo Ji, Nanhai Zhang, Medelbek Meruyert, Ansabayeva Assiyae, Weijun Zhang, Enke Liu, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Ruixia Ding, Zhikuan Jia, Yuhao Wang, Zihan Liu, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07386-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>Ridge-furrow film mulching (RFFM) and biochar addition are both effective soil management practices for improving crop yields in dry farming regions. However, they may have different impacts on soil moisture status and nitrogen budget.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A two-years experiment was conducted on soil water and nitrogen status, maize productivity, and nitrogen utilization through four treatments: FN, flat planting without biochar; FB, flat planting with 9.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar; RN, RFFM without biochar; RB, RFFM with 9.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In the 0–60 cm soil layer, RFFM reduced soil nitrogen storage and increased soil water storage (SWS), while biochar addition was the opposite. A significant interaction was observed between the two measures regarding the reduction of SWS in deep soil (60–200 cm), with the RB significantly increasing the soil desiccation index during the filling stage. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the decrease of SWS in deep soil did not adversely affect crop production, instead, it significantly increased maize productivity and utilization efficiency, while reducing nitrogen loss (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among them, the RB with the lowest SWS in the deep layer demonstrated the best overall performance, which increased maize yield by 27.2% and nitrogen use efficiency by 21.0%, and reduced NH<sub>3</sub> cmissions by 20.6% and mineral nitrogen residue by 46.9%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>RB is an effective field management strategy to promote soil nitrogen retention and improve nitrogen utilization of maize. However, it is important to remain vigilant about the potential impacts of decreased soil water on future agricultural productivity under this practice.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ridge-furrow film mulching combined with biochar addition enhances maize productivity and reduces nitrogen loss, but increases soil moisture consumption in semi-arid areas\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoyang Li, Liangqi Ren, Hao Pan, Yanbo Ji, Nanhai Zhang, Medelbek Meruyert, Ansabayeva Assiyae, Weijun Zhang, Enke Liu, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Ruixia Ding, Zhikuan Jia, Yuhao Wang, Zihan Liu, Peng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-025-07386-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims</h3><p>Ridge-furrow film mulching (RFFM) and biochar addition are both effective soil management practices for improving crop yields in dry farming regions. However, they may have different impacts on soil moisture status and nitrogen budget.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A two-years experiment was conducted on soil water and nitrogen status, maize productivity, and nitrogen utilization through four treatments: FN, flat planting without biochar; FB, flat planting with 9.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar; RN, RFFM without biochar; RB, RFFM with 9.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>In the 0–60 cm soil layer, RFFM reduced soil nitrogen storage and increased soil water storage (SWS), while biochar addition was the opposite. A significant interaction was observed between the two measures regarding the reduction of SWS in deep soil (60–200 cm), with the RB significantly increasing the soil desiccation index during the filling stage. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the decrease of SWS in deep soil did not adversely affect crop production, instead, it significantly increased maize productivity and utilization efficiency, while reducing nitrogen loss (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among them, the RB with the lowest SWS in the deep layer demonstrated the best overall performance, which increased maize yield by 27.2% and nitrogen use efficiency by 21.0%, and reduced NH<sub>3</sub> cmissions by 20.6% and mineral nitrogen residue by 46.9%.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>RB is an effective field management strategy to promote soil nitrogen retention and improve nitrogen utilization of maize. However, it is important to remain vigilant about the potential impacts of decreased soil water on future agricultural productivity under this practice.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07386-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07386-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的垄沟膜覆盖和添加生物炭都是旱作地区提高作物产量的有效土壤管理措施。然而,它们对土壤水分状况和氮收支的影响可能不同。方法通过4种处理,即不加生物炭平植;FB,平整种植,9.0 t ha - 1生物炭;无生物炭的RFFM;RFFM含9.0 t ha - 1生物炭。结果在0 ~ 60 cm土层,RFFM降低了土壤氮储量,增加了土壤水储量,而添加生物炭则相反。两种措施在降低深层土壤(60 ~ 200 cm) SWS方面存在显著的交互作用,灌浆期RB显著提高了土壤干燥指数。Pearson相关分析表明,深层土壤SWS的降低并未对作物生产产生不利影响,反而显著提高了玉米产量和利用效率,减少了氮素损失(P < 0.05)。其中,深层SWS最低的RB综合性能最好,玉米产量提高27.2%,氮素利用效率提高21.0%,NH3排放降低20.6%,矿质氮残留降低46.9%。结论srb是促进玉米土壤氮素保持和提高氮素利用率的有效田间管理策略。然而,重要的是要对这种做法下土壤水分减少对未来农业生产力的潜在影响保持警惕。
Ridge-furrow film mulching combined with biochar addition enhances maize productivity and reduces nitrogen loss, but increases soil moisture consumption in semi-arid areas
Aims
Ridge-furrow film mulching (RFFM) and biochar addition are both effective soil management practices for improving crop yields in dry farming regions. However, they may have different impacts on soil moisture status and nitrogen budget.
Methods
A two-years experiment was conducted on soil water and nitrogen status, maize productivity, and nitrogen utilization through four treatments: FN, flat planting without biochar; FB, flat planting with 9.0 t ha−1 biochar; RN, RFFM without biochar; RB, RFFM with 9.0 t ha−1 biochar.
Results
In the 0–60 cm soil layer, RFFM reduced soil nitrogen storage and increased soil water storage (SWS), while biochar addition was the opposite. A significant interaction was observed between the two measures regarding the reduction of SWS in deep soil (60–200 cm), with the RB significantly increasing the soil desiccation index during the filling stage. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the decrease of SWS in deep soil did not adversely affect crop production, instead, it significantly increased maize productivity and utilization efficiency, while reducing nitrogen loss (P < 0.05). Among them, the RB with the lowest SWS in the deep layer demonstrated the best overall performance, which increased maize yield by 27.2% and nitrogen use efficiency by 21.0%, and reduced NH3 cmissions by 20.6% and mineral nitrogen residue by 46.9%.
Conclusions
RB is an effective field management strategy to promote soil nitrogen retention and improve nitrogen utilization of maize. However, it is important to remain vigilant about the potential impacts of decreased soil water on future agricultural productivity under this practice.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.