{"title":"颧-眶-上颌复合骨折内固定后的生物力学评价。","authors":"Yan Li, Wei-Hao Zhou, Yu-Ran Ding, Ping He, Chen-Cheng Mo, Xiang-Dong Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop effective treatment strategies for zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex (ZOMC) fractures using finite element analysis (FEA) and investigate the mechanical properties and stress distribution of different internal fixators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-dimensional (3D) model was created from CT images of a patient with a unilateral ZOMC fracture, and the preinjury craniofacial structure was reconstructed. A cylindrical impactor was used to simulate facial impact. Biomechanical analysis was performed to assess the stability of internal fixation of the fracture lines at the frontal process of the zygomatic bone (FPZB), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and upper and lower parts of the zygomaticomaxillary suture (ZMS). The impact of different fixation methods on the anterior-inferior wall of the maxillary sinus (AIWMS) was also assessed in this study. A 120 N load was used to simulate physiological muscle force, and the maximum von Mises stress and maximum displacement for the fracture ends were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress distribution on the impact model was similar to that on the patient's fracture lines, with all internal fixation devices experiencing maximum stress below the yield stress. The model exhibiting the largest displacement of the zygomatic body, IOR, and FPZB had not undergone internal fixation of the FPZB. The greatest maximum displacement value was recorded for the maxilla, at the non-fixed lower ZMS. The maximum displacement value was lower for 2 fixators placed at the AIWMS than for a single fixator placed at the fracture midline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of 2 internal fixators along the zygomaticomaxillary (NMB) and nasomaxillary buttresses (NMB) provides greater stability than the placement of a single device does. Moreover, stabilizing the fracture lines in the FPZB is essential, as doing so reduces the extent of displacement of free fracture ends by counteracting the masseter muscle force.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Evaluation of Zygomatic-Orbital-Maxillary Complex Fractures Following Internal Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li, Wei-Hao Zhou, Yu-Ran Ding, Ping He, Chen-Cheng Mo, Xiang-Dong Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop effective treatment strategies for zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex (ZOMC) fractures using finite element analysis (FEA) and investigate the mechanical properties and stress distribution of different internal fixators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-dimensional (3D) model was created from CT images of a patient with a unilateral ZOMC fracture, and the preinjury craniofacial structure was reconstructed. A cylindrical impactor was used to simulate facial impact. Biomechanical analysis was performed to assess the stability of internal fixation of the fracture lines at the frontal process of the zygomatic bone (FPZB), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and upper and lower parts of the zygomaticomaxillary suture (ZMS). The impact of different fixation methods on the anterior-inferior wall of the maxillary sinus (AIWMS) was also assessed in this study. A 120 N load was used to simulate physiological muscle force, and the maximum von Mises stress and maximum displacement for the fracture ends were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress distribution on the impact model was similar to that on the patient's fracture lines, with all internal fixation devices experiencing maximum stress below the yield stress. The model exhibiting the largest displacement of the zygomatic body, IOR, and FPZB had not undergone internal fixation of the FPZB. The greatest maximum displacement value was recorded for the maxilla, at the non-fixed lower ZMS. The maximum displacement value was lower for 2 fixators placed at the AIWMS than for a single fixator placed at the fracture midline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of 2 internal fixators along the zygomaticomaxillary (NMB) and nasomaxillary buttresses (NMB) provides greater stability than the placement of a single device does. Moreover, stabilizing the fracture lines in the FPZB is essential, as doing so reduces the extent of displacement of free fracture ends by counteracting the masseter muscle force.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical Evaluation of Zygomatic-Orbital-Maxillary Complex Fractures Following Internal Fixation.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop effective treatment strategies for zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex (ZOMC) fractures using finite element analysis (FEA) and investigate the mechanical properties and stress distribution of different internal fixators.
Methods: A three-dimensional (3D) model was created from CT images of a patient with a unilateral ZOMC fracture, and the preinjury craniofacial structure was reconstructed. A cylindrical impactor was used to simulate facial impact. Biomechanical analysis was performed to assess the stability of internal fixation of the fracture lines at the frontal process of the zygomatic bone (FPZB), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and upper and lower parts of the zygomaticomaxillary suture (ZMS). The impact of different fixation methods on the anterior-inferior wall of the maxillary sinus (AIWMS) was also assessed in this study. A 120 N load was used to simulate physiological muscle force, and the maximum von Mises stress and maximum displacement for the fracture ends were assessed.
Results: The stress distribution on the impact model was similar to that on the patient's fracture lines, with all internal fixation devices experiencing maximum stress below the yield stress. The model exhibiting the largest displacement of the zygomatic body, IOR, and FPZB had not undergone internal fixation of the FPZB. The greatest maximum displacement value was recorded for the maxilla, at the non-fixed lower ZMS. The maximum displacement value was lower for 2 fixators placed at the AIWMS than for a single fixator placed at the fracture midline.
Conclusions: The placement of 2 internal fixators along the zygomaticomaxillary (NMB) and nasomaxillary buttresses (NMB) provides greater stability than the placement of a single device does. Moreover, stabilizing the fracture lines in the FPZB is essential, as doing so reduces the extent of displacement of free fracture ends by counteracting the masseter muscle force.
期刊介绍：
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
