8至11岁儿童的寄养照顾者和教师福利包:STrAWB可行性随机对照试验。

Nikki Luke, Robin Banerjee, Valerie Dunn, Nick Douglas, Áine Kelly, Helen Trivedi, Annette Bauer, Andrew Cook, Nick Midgley, Matt Woolgar
{"title":"8至11岁儿童的寄养照顾者和教师福利包:STrAWB可行性随机对照试验。","authors":"Nikki Luke, Robin Banerjee, Valerie Dunn, Nick Douglas, Áine Kelly, Helen Trivedi, Annette Bauer, Andrew Cook, Nick Midgley, Matt Woolgar","doi":"10.3310/NGXR5244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children in care are at elevated risk of mental health issues and poorer well-being, and social care and health services are under pressure to meet their needs. The Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being programme is a recent approach to training and assessment designed to bring together foster carers and designated teachers to identify and meet the well-being needs of primary school-aged children in care, across the home and school contexts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This feasibility randomised controlled trial addressed key questions concerning the acceptability of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention (including training, assessments, clinical review and feedback) and the feasibility of the research design for a larger randomised controlled trial (including recruitment, randomisation and outcome measures).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a two-arm randomised controlled trial (Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention vs. control group), with two points of data collection (baseline and 12-month follow-up) for our primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study focused on looked-after children from four local authorities in southern England. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, both the research and intervention activities were undertaken online with participants.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Looked-after children aged 8-11 years were recruited from the participating local authorities, along with their foster/kinship carers and designated teachers. Carers for all children in the authorities meeting inclusion criteria were initially invited to participate. The original target sample size was 70 children, with 35 receiving the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and 35 in the control group. However, only 21 looked-after children were successfully recruited and randomised.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being is an integrated approach that combines training on mental health, well-being and resilience for foster carers and designated teachers; a multi-informant assessment package; review of assessments by mental health experts; and feedback to enable key adults to respond to identified needs and strengths. COVID-19 adaptations enabled all key elements to be delivered remotely.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Two multi-informant primary outcome measures were included as possible candidates for a larger randomised controlled trial: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Paediatric Quality of Life Scale. A further multi-informant secondary outcome measure was also included: the Behavioural and Emotional Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was not demonstrated, as recruitment was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and further attrition occurred over the extended project duration. For the small number who completed the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being package, key elements of the intervention were acceptable to participants. In addition, beyond issues with recruitment and retention, key aspects of the randomised controlled trial design, including randomisation, were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>It is impossible to distinguish precisely between impacts of COVID-19 and broader challenges with securing the capacity and stability needed to deliver and evaluate the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key elements of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and randomised controlled trial process were acceptable, but the overall randomised controlled trial research design was not feasible in this study. The project was heavily compromised by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on foster carers, schools, local services and children.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Potential strategies are suggested to address challenges with evaluating integrated training and assessment approaches aimed at key adults supporting looked-after children.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR127799.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well-being package for foster carers and teachers of looked-after children aged 8 to 11 years: the STrAWB feasibility RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Nikki Luke, Robin Banerjee, Valerie Dunn, Nick Douglas, Áine Kelly, Helen Trivedi, Annette Bauer, Andrew Cook, Nick Midgley, Matt Woolgar\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/NGXR5244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children in care are at elevated risk of mental health issues and poorer well-being, and social care and health services are under pressure to meet their needs. The Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being programme is a recent approach to training and assessment designed to bring together foster carers and designated teachers to identify and meet the well-being needs of primary school-aged children in care, across the home and school contexts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This feasibility randomised controlled trial addressed key questions concerning the acceptability of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention (including training, assessments, clinical review and feedback) and the feasibility of the research design for a larger randomised controlled trial (including recruitment, randomisation and outcome measures).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a two-arm randomised controlled trial (Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention vs. control group), with two points of data collection (baseline and 12-month follow-up) for our primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study focused on looked-after children from four local authorities in southern England. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, both the research and intervention activities were undertaken online with participants.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Looked-after children aged 8-11 years were recruited from the participating local authorities, along with their foster/kinship carers and designated teachers. Carers for all children in the authorities meeting inclusion criteria were initially invited to participate. The original target sample size was 70 children, with 35 receiving the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and 35 in the control group. However, only 21 looked-after children were successfully recruited and randomised.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being is an integrated approach that combines training on mental health, well-being and resilience for foster carers and designated teachers; a multi-informant assessment package; review of assessments by mental health experts; and feedback to enable key adults to respond to identified needs and strengths. COVID-19 adaptations enabled all key elements to be delivered remotely.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Two multi-informant primary outcome measures were included as possible candidates for a larger randomised controlled trial: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Paediatric Quality of Life Scale. A further multi-informant secondary outcome measure was also included: the Behavioural and Emotional Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was not demonstrated, as recruitment was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and further attrition occurred over the extended project duration. For the small number who completed the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being package, key elements of the intervention were acceptable to participants. In addition, beyond issues with recruitment and retention, key aspects of the randomised controlled trial design, including randomisation, were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>It is impossible to distinguish precisely between impacts of COVID-19 and broader challenges with securing the capacity and stability needed to deliver and evaluate the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key elements of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and randomised controlled trial process were acceptable, but the overall randomised controlled trial research design was not feasible in this study. The project was heavily compromised by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on foster carers, schools, local services and children.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Potential strategies are suggested to address challenges with evaluating integrated training and assessment approaches aimed at key adults supporting looked-after children.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR127799.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health research (Southampton, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health research (Southampton, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/NGXR5244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/NGXR5244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受照料的儿童出现精神健康问题的风险较高,福祉较差,社会照料和卫生服务面临着满足其需求的压力。福利共享培训和评估计划是最近的一种培训和评估方法,旨在将寄养照顾者和指定教师聚集在一起,以确定和满足在家庭和学校环境中照顾的小学学龄儿童的福利需求。目的:本可行性随机对照试验解决了有关福祉干预共享培训和评估(包括培训、评估、临床审查和反馈)的可接受性以及更大规模随机对照试验研究设计的可行性(包括招募、随机化和结果测量)的关键问题。设计:这是一项两组随机对照试验(幸福感干预的共享培训和评估与对照组),我们的主要和次要结果有两个数据收集点(基线和12个月随访)。环境:这项研究的重点是来自英格兰南部四个地方政府的受照顾儿童。在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,研究和干预活动都是与参与者在线进行的。参与者:从参与的地方当局招募了8-11岁的被照顾儿童,以及他们的寄养/亲属照顾者和指定教师。当局中符合纳入标准的所有儿童的照料者最初被邀请参加。最初的目标样本量为70名儿童,其中35名接受幸福干预的共享培训和评估,35名作为对照组。然而,只有21名被照顾的儿童被成功招募并随机分配。干预措施:福祉共享培训和评估是一种综合方法,将对寄养照顾者和指定教师进行心理健康、福祉和复原力方面的培训结合起来;多信息提供者一揽子评估;审查心理健康专家的评估;以及反馈,使关键的成年人能够对确定的需求和优势做出反应。COVID-19适应使所有关键要素得以远程交付。主要结果测量:两个多信息的主要结果测量被纳入一个更大的随机对照试验的可能候选:优势和困难问卷和儿科生活质量量表。进一步的多信息来源次要结果测量也包括:行为和情绪评定量表。结果:由于招聘受到COVID-19大流行的严重影响,并且随着项目持续时间的延长,出现了进一步的人员流失,因此没有证明可行性。对于少数完成福利共享培训和评估一揽子计划的人来说,干预措施的关键要素对参与者来说是可以接受的。此外,除了招募和保留问题外,随机对照试验设计的关键方面,包括随机化,都是可以接受的。局限性:在确保提供和评估福祉共享培训和评估干预措施所需的能力和稳定性方面,不可能准确区分COVID-19的影响和更广泛的挑战。结论:幸福感共享培训与评估干预和随机对照试验过程的关键要素是可以接受的,但总体随机对照试验研究设计在本研究中是不可行的。2019冠状病毒病大流行对寄养照料者、学校、地方服务机构和儿童的影响严重影响了该项目。未来的工作:建议潜在的战略,以应对挑战,评估综合培训和评估方法,针对关键成人支持照看儿童。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR127799。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Well-being package for foster carers and teachers of looked-after children aged 8 to 11 years: the STrAWB feasibility RCT.

Background: Children in care are at elevated risk of mental health issues and poorer well-being, and social care and health services are under pressure to meet their needs. The Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being programme is a recent approach to training and assessment designed to bring together foster carers and designated teachers to identify and meet the well-being needs of primary school-aged children in care, across the home and school contexts.

Objectives: This feasibility randomised controlled trial addressed key questions concerning the acceptability of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention (including training, assessments, clinical review and feedback) and the feasibility of the research design for a larger randomised controlled trial (including recruitment, randomisation and outcome measures).

Design: This was a two-arm randomised controlled trial (Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention vs. control group), with two points of data collection (baseline and 12-month follow-up) for our primary and secondary outcomes.

Setting: The study focused on looked-after children from four local authorities in southern England. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, both the research and intervention activities were undertaken online with participants.

Participants: Looked-after children aged 8-11 years were recruited from the participating local authorities, along with their foster/kinship carers and designated teachers. Carers for all children in the authorities meeting inclusion criteria were initially invited to participate. The original target sample size was 70 children, with 35 receiving the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and 35 in the control group. However, only 21 looked-after children were successfully recruited and randomised.

Interventions: Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being is an integrated approach that combines training on mental health, well-being and resilience for foster carers and designated teachers; a multi-informant assessment package; review of assessments by mental health experts; and feedback to enable key adults to respond to identified needs and strengths. COVID-19 adaptations enabled all key elements to be delivered remotely.

Main outcome measures: Two multi-informant primary outcome measures were included as possible candidates for a larger randomised controlled trial: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Paediatric Quality of Life Scale. A further multi-informant secondary outcome measure was also included: the Behavioural and Emotional Rating Scale.

Results: Feasibility was not demonstrated, as recruitment was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and further attrition occurred over the extended project duration. For the small number who completed the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being package, key elements of the intervention were acceptable to participants. In addition, beyond issues with recruitment and retention, key aspects of the randomised controlled trial design, including randomisation, were acceptable.

Limitations: It is impossible to distinguish precisely between impacts of COVID-19 and broader challenges with securing the capacity and stability needed to deliver and evaluate the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention.

Conclusions: Key elements of the Shared Training and Assessment for Well-Being intervention and randomised controlled trial process were acceptable, but the overall randomised controlled trial research design was not feasible in this study. The project was heavily compromised by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on foster carers, schools, local services and children.

Future work: Potential strategies are suggested to address challenges with evaluating integrated training and assessment approaches aimed at key adults supporting looked-after children.

Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR127799.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信