分析对数正态数据:非数学实用指南。

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacological Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100049
Harvey J Motulsky, Trajen Head, Paul B S Clarke
{"title":"分析对数正态数据:非数学实用指南。","authors":"Harvey J Motulsky, Trajen Head, Paul B S Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lognormal distributions are pervasive in pharmacology and elsewhere in biomedical science, arising naturally when biological effects multiply rather than add. Despite their ubiquity in pharmacological parameters (eg, EC50, IC50, Kd, and Km), lognormal distributions are often overlooked or misunderstood, leading to flawed data analysis. This largely nonmathematical review explains why lognormal distributions are common, how to recognize them, and how to analyze them appropriately. We show that many measured variables are lognormal. So are many derived parameters, particularly those defined as ratios of lognormal variables. Through examples and simulations accessible to working scientists, we demonstrate how misidentifying lognormal distributions as normal leads to reduced statistical power, unnecessarily large sample sizes, false identification of outliers, and inappropriate reporting of effects as differences rather than ratios. We challenge the common practice of using normality tests to decide how to analyze data, showing that many data sets pass both normality and lognormality tests, especially with small sample sizes. Instead, we advocate for assuming lognormality based on the nature of the variable. This review provides practical guidance on recognizing and presenting lognormal data, and comparing data sets sampled from lognormal distributions. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, we recommend the lognormal Welch's t test or nonparametric Brunner-Munzel test for comparing 2 unpaired groups, the lognormal ratio paired t test for paired comparisons, and lognormal ANOVA for ≥3 groups. By recognizing and properly handling lognormal distributions, pharmacologists can design more efficient experiments, obtain more reliable statistical inferences, and communicate their results more effectively. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Lognormal distributions are common in pharmacology and many scientific fields, but they are often misunderstood or overlooked. This review provides a detailed guide to recognizing and analyzing lognormal data, aiming to help pharmacologists perform more appropriate and more powerful statistical analyses, draw more meaningful conclusions from their data, and communicate their results more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":"77 3","pages":"100049"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing lognormal data: A nonmathematical practical guide.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey J Motulsky, Trajen Head, Paul B S Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lognormal distributions are pervasive in pharmacology and elsewhere in biomedical science, arising naturally when biological effects multiply rather than add. Despite their ubiquity in pharmacological parameters (eg, EC50, IC50, Kd, and Km), lognormal distributions are often overlooked or misunderstood, leading to flawed data analysis. This largely nonmathematical review explains why lognormal distributions are common, how to recognize them, and how to analyze them appropriately. We show that many measured variables are lognormal. So are many derived parameters, particularly those defined as ratios of lognormal variables. Through examples and simulations accessible to working scientists, we demonstrate how misidentifying lognormal distributions as normal leads to reduced statistical power, unnecessarily large sample sizes, false identification of outliers, and inappropriate reporting of effects as differences rather than ratios. We challenge the common practice of using normality tests to decide how to analyze data, showing that many data sets pass both normality and lognormality tests, especially with small sample sizes. Instead, we advocate for assuming lognormality based on the nature of the variable. This review provides practical guidance on recognizing and presenting lognormal data, and comparing data sets sampled from lognormal distributions. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, we recommend the lognormal Welch's t test or nonparametric Brunner-Munzel test for comparing 2 unpaired groups, the lognormal ratio paired t test for paired comparisons, and lognormal ANOVA for ≥3 groups. By recognizing and properly handling lognormal distributions, pharmacologists can design more efficient experiments, obtain more reliable statistical inferences, and communicate their results more effectively. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Lognormal distributions are common in pharmacology and many scientific fields, but they are often misunderstood or overlooked. This review provides a detailed guide to recognizing and analyzing lognormal data, aiming to help pharmacologists perform more appropriate and more powerful statistical analyses, draw more meaningful conclusions from their data, and communicate their results more effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"100049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100049\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对数正态分布在药理学和生物医学科学的其他领域普遍存在,当生物效应增加而不是增加时自然产生。尽管对数正态分布在药理学参数(如EC50、IC50、Kd和Km)中普遍存在,但对数正态分布经常被忽视或误解,导致数据分析有缺陷。这篇主要是非数学性质的评论解释了为什么对数正态分布很常见,如何识别它们,以及如何适当地分析它们。我们证明了许多测量变量是对数正态的。许多衍生参数也是如此,特别是那些定义为对数正态变量之比的参数。通过工作科学家可以使用的示例和模拟,我们展示了将对数正态分布错误地识别为正态分布如何导致统计能力降低,不必要的大样本量,异常值的错误识别以及不恰当地将影响报告为差异而不是比率。我们挑战了使用正态性测试来决定如何分析数据的常见做法,表明许多数据集同时通过正态性和对数正态性测试,特别是在小样本量的情况下。相反,我们主张基于变量的性质假设对数正态性。这篇综述提供了识别和呈现对数正态数据的实用指导,并比较从对数正态分布中采样的数据集。基于蒙特卡罗模拟,我们建议对2个未配对组的比较采用对数正态Welch’st检验或非参数Brunner-Munzel检验,对成对比较采用对数正态比配对t检验,对≥3个组采用对数正态方差分析。通过识别和正确处理对数正态分布,药理学家可以设计更有效的实验,获得更可靠的统计推断,并更有效地交流他们的结果。意义声明:对数正态分布在药理学和许多科学领域中很常见,但它们经常被误解或忽视。本文对对数正态数据的识别和分析提供了详细的指导,旨在帮助药理学家进行更合适和更有力的统计分析,从他们的数据中得出更有意义的结论,并更有效地交流他们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing lognormal data: A nonmathematical practical guide.

Lognormal distributions are pervasive in pharmacology and elsewhere in biomedical science, arising naturally when biological effects multiply rather than add. Despite their ubiquity in pharmacological parameters (eg, EC50, IC50, Kd, and Km), lognormal distributions are often overlooked or misunderstood, leading to flawed data analysis. This largely nonmathematical review explains why lognormal distributions are common, how to recognize them, and how to analyze them appropriately. We show that many measured variables are lognormal. So are many derived parameters, particularly those defined as ratios of lognormal variables. Through examples and simulations accessible to working scientists, we demonstrate how misidentifying lognormal distributions as normal leads to reduced statistical power, unnecessarily large sample sizes, false identification of outliers, and inappropriate reporting of effects as differences rather than ratios. We challenge the common practice of using normality tests to decide how to analyze data, showing that many data sets pass both normality and lognormality tests, especially with small sample sizes. Instead, we advocate for assuming lognormality based on the nature of the variable. This review provides practical guidance on recognizing and presenting lognormal data, and comparing data sets sampled from lognormal distributions. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, we recommend the lognormal Welch's t test or nonparametric Brunner-Munzel test for comparing 2 unpaired groups, the lognormal ratio paired t test for paired comparisons, and lognormal ANOVA for ≥3 groups. By recognizing and properly handling lognormal distributions, pharmacologists can design more efficient experiments, obtain more reliable statistical inferences, and communicate their results more effectively. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Lognormal distributions are common in pharmacology and many scientific fields, but they are often misunderstood or overlooked. This review provides a detailed guide to recognizing and analyzing lognormal data, aiming to help pharmacologists perform more appropriate and more powerful statistical analyses, draw more meaningful conclusions from their data, and communicate their results more effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reviews
Pharmacological Reviews 医学-药学
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
0.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reviews is a highly popular and well-received journal that has a long and rich history of success. It was first published in 1949 and is currently published bimonthly online by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. The journal is indexed or abstracted by various databases, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews Database, Biosciences Information Service, Current Contents/Life Sciences, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Index Medicus, Index to Scientific Reviews, Medical Documentation Service, Reference Update, Research Alerts, Science Citation Index, and SciSearch. Pharmacological Reviews offers comprehensive reviews of new pharmacological fields and is able to stay up-to-date with published content. Overall, it is highly regarded by scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信